ADVFN Logo ADVFN

We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.

Trending Now

Toplists

It looks like you aren't logged in.
Click the button below to log in and view your recent history.

Hot Features

Registration Strip Icon for discussion Register to chat with like-minded investors on our interactive forums.

HUM Hummingbird Resources Plc

8.75
-0.25 (-2.78%)
26 Jul 2024 - Closed
Delayed by 15 minutes
Share Name Share Symbol Market Type Share ISIN Share Description
Hummingbird Resources Plc LSE:HUM London Ordinary Share GB00B60BWY28 ORD 1P
  Price Change % Change Share Price Bid Price Offer Price High Price Low Price Open Price Shares Traded Last Trade
  -0.25 -2.78% 8.75 8.50 9.00 9.05 8.75 9.00 581,347 15:19:17
Industry Sector Turnover Profit EPS - Basic PE Ratio Market Cap
Gold Ores 150.52M -34.28M -0.0569 -1.54 54.17M
Hummingbird Resources Plc is listed in the Gold Ores sector of the London Stock Exchange with ticker HUM. The last closing price for Hummingbird Resources was 9p. Over the last year, Hummingbird Resources shares have traded in a share price range of 4.10p to 14.00p.

Hummingbird Resources currently has 601,918,700 shares in issue. The market capitalisation of Hummingbird Resources is £54.17 million. Hummingbird Resources has a price to earnings ratio (PE ratio) of -1.54.

Hummingbird Resources Share Discussion Threads

Showing 7926 to 7948 of 28375 messages
Chat Pages: Latest  319  318  317  316  315  314  313  312  311  310  309  308  Older
DateSubjectAuthorDiscuss
30/8/2019
08:53
Well yesterday was the first time Hum closed above my break even point. I think I will have a beer this weekend. I'm one of the lucky ones who managed to buy more when it was cheap so I expect many more still need low/mid thirties before they wipe the sweat from their brow. I truly hope this keeps motoring towards the mid 30s for everyone to be back on dry land and to pay off all the anxiety counselling sessions we needed when our money went all "Houdini"!
referee1
30/8/2019
02:07
And it is an annual event. New Buyer, that means it happens every year. Strange how the "experienced team" didn't figure that out last year, isn't it? The Hippos did.
borderterrier1
29/8/2019
16:30
It's called the rainy season
andrewsr
29/8/2019
16:22
heavy rain over there now, looking at 2 week forecast plenty to come
avsome1968
29/8/2019
14:51
I wonder if that 4.3m earlier was the end of a disposal
bishan bedi
29/8/2019
13:41
Nice moves
qs99
29/8/2019
12:34
Great comments from Fsj and GB on the LSE bb re. their meeting with Bert Monroe. Bert says everything is Honky Dory with this, nothing to worry about. What did you expect him to say? And BTW Frank, the other stock pick that you mentioned. Don't forget I was the one that mentioned Anglo Asian Mining as my gold pick on here over a year ago, remember? I believe you said I was an idiot at that time?
borderterrier1
27/8/2019
10:36
phew good to see bookwormrobert says "it's not worth spending any more time on this particular miner" which no doubt means he will be back in a month or so to deramp again.
new_buyer
27/8/2019
09:21
Sleveen ... clueless on your understanding of corporate accounts . The cash flow being generated now by POG is hugely significant . How can you not see this is self financing and all debt can be cleared relatively quickly . Oh ... I see .. you don’t understand accounts 🤡
kennyp52
26/8/2019
21:26
Bookwormrobert/tigerbythetail pops up with his bimonthly “terrible management” and “a placing is inevitable”. When you flounced off the LSE HUM board months ago during a hissy fit (seems you have form for that) most hoped you’d gone for good but like a bad smell you linger around where no one wants to read your drivel! Borderterrier posts more interestingly than you (did I really just type that? Off for a lie down)!!!
new_buyer
26/8/2019
13:38
No comments on the "Hummingbird swings to a LOSS" news? What did you expect?
borderterrier1
25/8/2019
14:27
No point in going over the "details" again on here. This was going S immediately after the mine was completed "on time and on budget." In other words, before the security breach, pitwall collapse and bridge wash out. As other have said on here, it would appear that the share price was held back periodically to allow strategic buying at reduced prices. I wonder why? Please read my post on here no. 7098 . Like you, I invest to make money and since I invested here, despite DMOR way back in 2015, up to now this has not delivered. I hope it will.
borderterrier1
25/8/2019
07:55
Thanks for the detailed response borderterrier1 .
kennyp52
23/8/2019
18:39
kennyp52. As you say you are new to this board. Perhaps you should have taken the time to read some of the comments from others from 2 1/2 years ago, not just mine. At that time, many investors were as positive as you are. But here we are still waiting for the share price to move N.
borderterrier1
23/8/2019
18:13
Taking the results apart then at least they are generating cash and making significant finance repayments ( both loan and lease ) - see the cash flow statement . Don’t know how much their planned CAPEX is moving forward but they say they still have an undrawn 10m facility . So cash isn’t the issue . Big depreciation reserve is hammering the P&L figures but this doesn’t really bother me if they are near the end of mine development costs . £4m extra inventory will be valued at cost so with POG having been $1400 to $1500 since then some held back profit up the sleeve there , good management IMO . I’m lucky to have bought in recently on this so no historical loss but I see this moving up quite nicely after the H2 results . Good luck all .
kennyp52
23/8/2019
17:37
I do. As I have repeatedly said, I MADE A MISTAKE by investing here. But I accept that fact instead of talking this up like others do year after year. Would you rather I post continual positive posts here like some others do? The power of suggestion doesn't work.
borderterrier1
23/8/2019
14:33
I agree. But after this share price being 39p before "mine completion on time and on budget" in July 2016 to where it is today, no one in their right mind could call this a "shrewd investment" could they? Me included.

The share price was 26p three years ago in August 2016 when this was just a hole in the ground (with a liar at the top?) so it could take another two years from today to get back to the dizzy heights of 39p. For a total 4 1/2-5 year investment things are not improving. But of course, it isn't the Ceo or Bod faults is it? But who would you put the blame on? Bad luck, rainy season? And all the time the "management" enjoy their large salaries and share options.

borderterrier1
23/8/2019
14:10
It's not good news, it's not bad news. One couldn't even call it news per se.
redtrend
23/8/2019
13:26
Once again, "good news" produces a negative result on the share price Wake up guys. After almost three years now this is going nowhere. Complete dog.
borderterrier1
23/8/2019
13:21
Lol if the news was that good why are we down, management cant be trusted been so many let downs over the years, hope they can turn a leaf and produce the goods next 12 month we shall see.
Just a small holding here just in the blue, fingers crossed gold keeps strong also.

avsome1968
23/8/2019
10:31
Redtrend, might be prudent for them to do a refinance anyway and provide some headroom to take out more debt if needed. Doesn't mean they have to draw it all.

An increased LOM, updated R&R and the proven production should unlock financing at much better terms than what they got so far.

casual47
23/8/2019
10:26
Casual - if they hit guidance I don't think they'll even need to use the $10m undrawn facility for working capital. Having said that in the short-term they may dip into it, as Trade Payables is quite elevated at present to work through all the Capex. Funnily enough it's the exact same facility bookworm adamantly stated didn't exist.

On refinancing, I don't think any will be needed for Yanfolila alone (again, if they hit guidance). Have no qualms though if they take additional financing out for Cora acquisitions, other M&A or Dugbe.

redtrend
23/8/2019
10:19
Oh dear the usual suspects show up who don't have a clue about accounts or simply intentionally making misleading and false statements. Perhaps ignorance is a defence. As Andrew states liabilities like "lease liabilities" are covered by AISC - it's simply new reporting requirements required by "IFRS 16", on how the books are presented. For HUM it's effectively an upfront snapshot of working capital/ trade payables.


Bookworm you honestly have no shame. When Goldibucks recently sold out of JLP (appears to be the only accountant who posted on that thread), you turned on your usual melodrama about losing respect for him and why he was still posting. Low and behold, here you are.

Most don't need geography lessons here, but Mali is an incredibly large country. The north is dangerous, central area has regional problems, but is full of UN troops and some inter-regional fighting has given way to cease fires and tentative peace treaties. The south where Bamako and Yanfolila are safe in comparison with no such fighting or security issues.

If some were a bit more nuanced with potential negatives, you could raise the issue of potential changes in VAT law in Mali. Such law if enacted though will take time, be fought by the bigger miners and in a gold bull, if HUM get their house in order meeting guidance, it doesn't change the fact HUM is significantly undervalued.

redtrend
Chat Pages: Latest  319  318  317  316  315  314  313  312  311  310  309  308  Older

Your Recent History

Delayed Upgrade Clock