Hummingbird Resources Share Discussion Threads

[borderterrier1] 04/8/2019 20:03

NB. The info. I post is found on the Internet. I don't "make it up" or lie about any of it. Unfortunately, even though everything is factual, some investors do not appreciate it, hence the "negative post" scenario. Personally, I would always prefer to hear the truth about a co. I am invested in rather than hype from a paid mouthpiece(s). Once bitten, twice shy. I am still invested here. Hopefully, they will at last get their act together.

[new_buyer] 04/8/2019 17:38

That’s the point, I don’t believe a word you’ve ever posted here but you are desperate for some kind of acceptance and you’re desperation is hilarious.

[borderterrier1] 04/8/2019 17:18

NB. So why read my posts? I don't have any proof other than what you read on the Internet. Why not DYOR instead of taking my word for it?

[new_buyer] 04/8/2019 16:17

Over 1,000 posts, all on this board, all negative, conspiracy theories without any proof, looks like a duck, quacks like a duck, it’s a paid deramper oh and supposedly with a $1m share portfolio!! As if!!

[charlieeee] 04/8/2019 11:35

I had a chat to Bert Monro about Bunker Hill and the rational was perfectly sane: they want near term projects (like Yanfolila) to deliver near term returns and not blue skies exploration.

Time will tell. Yanfolila now is back on track and so the $2 million investment in Bunker Hill should be reexamined in the light of that strategic objective: the hysteria was, IMO, unjustified.

Why is anyone giving oxygen to a poster who is short or thick? Whilst I have no issue at all with differing points of view, I object strongly to attempted share price manipulation and that is what the persistence indicates.Apologies, if my post does not quite follow the thread: it is because BT has long been on filter and so I only see the counter arguments!

[borderterrier1] 04/8/2019 02:14

moneyfornothing1 My financial guy here in the US advised that in his opinion, the BH project was a non starter. Please let me go back and find who was involved in this in the next day or so and get back to you.

[moneyfornothing1] 03/8/2019 23:03

Bunker Hill was the $2m investment in the US, I think you are referring too, which I’ve not seen many positive posts on from what I’ve researched. Borderterrier you say there’s a link between the Betts family and the Bunker Hill project?

[new_buyer] 03/8/2019 22:32

Stop reversing!!

[borderterrier1] 03/8/2019 19:52

NB. No, I think you may have mis-interpreted. I think you will find I said Hum's broker was prosecuted by the FBI for pump and dump schemes. That is correct. The BH link was correct.

[new_buyer] 03/8/2019 18:50

That’s a change of tune borderterrier, you’ve been saying for months that HUM were part of the pump and dump scheme and when you’ve been told to provide proof you never have! You are certainly changing your tune, remember the Betts Bunker Hill “link”. For someone’s who’s never been wrong on this share you certainly are revising a lot of what you’ve said before!

[borderterrier1] 03/8/2019 16:58

andrewsr. And what you say here with the oil co. is exactly why I am doubtful because I got screwed by an oil co. many years ago and lost a lot of money. I did exhaustive research here but then "things" started to emerge. The run up to mine completion was well published with no shortage of takers. Then a decline ever since. For the link to the broker please type Beaufort securities, Hummingbird resources into your browser. Now, I'm not suggesting that there is any hanky panky here, in fact I e mailed Hum at the time. But fact that the broker was prosecuted by the FBI doesn't do the share price or investors any favours.

[...]

[andrewsr] 03/8/2019 16:14

Your quote, which we've all heard before, is applicable to just about any enterprise, probably more so to exploratory oil drill-holes, which are massively extrapolated, but particularly to any speculative venture. Independent compliance with JORC rules make it less likely these days with mining, but you're still going to get lean patches and rich veins some known, some not.
I can't recall seeing any house broker pump and dump reports - can you provide a link?

I remember Gulf Keystone made estimates of billions of barrels of oil on several of their licences and then ended up giving them back to the government with presumably nothing in them at all, although one licence did contain a lot of oil, which is producing today.
I think that's less likely with an independently verified JORC compliant gold resource.

Hum should be able to produce 130,000 oz per year at $800/oz (which they have done previously) for the next 3 years, which is a profit of $78m at $1400/oz. So, 60p should be easily achievable, if not a lot more. What happens after 3 years depends on proving up more resources, further discoveries and maybe Cora. Then there's Dugbe, which is now worth quite a lot at $1400/oz (NPV >>$200m), but totally discounted by the market.

[new_buyer] 03/8/2019 16:00

of Course no doubt that’s what you do! Just accept it’s easy to see you only post here.

[borderterrier1] 03/8/2019 13:01

NB. I understand that. But I would think that would be more difficult if the poster used multiple nicknames and locations.

[borderterrier1] 03/8/2019 12:59

andrewsr I think you will find that the share price began retreating immediately on mine completion. The fact that the Hum broker ( who gave a speculative buy rating on Hum with a TP of 60p I believe? ) was prosecuted by the FBI for pump and dump schemes obviously didn't help. The security breach didn't help. The pitwall, bridge, weather, BH etc. didn't help. Oh, I know it was all just "bad luck". But the hum team are supposed to be "highly experienced" miners in W Africa are they not? As for your other calculations/percentages etc. they would suggest exactly what I have said multiple times by quoting the 1900's prospectors saying:- "A gold mine is a hole in the ground with a liar at the top".

[andrewsr] 03/8/2019 09:59

When Hum haven't been on track, they've been de-railed by mostly unforeseen and unpredictable events. When any miner investigates a volume of rock, only about .001% is known (say 100mm drill-holes at 25m centres), the rest is interpolated or maybe extrapolated a bit. So the extent of artisanal workings could only be estimated. Similarly with the rock/soil instability issue, only so much is known about the ground. The weakness of the bridge to extreme flood conditions could hardly have been foreseen and not within their control. So at least they should now be wise to rock/soil face and bridge weaknesses. The rock/soil instability issue should be resolved now anyway by excavating in harder more stable ground.

[new_buyer] 03/8/2019 09:03

Borderterrier you are amusing nothing else and it’s not difficult to check any posters posting history here, surely even a man of your intelligence can work it out!!

[borderterrier1] 03/8/2019 00:39

new_buyer Naughty, naughty! Don't get mad at me just because everyone is selling on the good news again.

[borderterrier1] 03/8/2019 00:02

Moneyfornothing1 How did you check? Just curious.

[moneyfornothing1] 02/8/2019 23:51

Well it’s easy to check, I’ve checkef and you don’t and haven’t. If you have which post number?

[borderterrier1] 02/8/2019 22:48

moneyfornothing1 I do comment on other bb's. And not just about Hum.