Gulf Keystone Petroleum Share Discussion Threads

[nestoframpers] 22/10/2016 10:57

A living that will lead to them burning in Hell JB ;o)

[gkphero] 22/10/2016 10:43

Most of the bashers of GKP have obviously been employed by bent financial institutions.

It's a living I suppose.

[oil_investor] 22/10/2016 10:34

Mr Roper: thanks. He was recorded on an iPhone, not by myself. There are several copies in different locations, so there won't be any "vanishing acts".

[oil_investor] 22/10/2016 10:28

Nonsense from the purported "oil and gas analyst" joseki, I'm afraid.

He says "The non commerciality of Sheikh Adi is now accepted".

Where on earth does this claim come from? ERC gave substantial Contigent Resources figures for Sheikh Adi, for both oil and gas, and it is well-known in Iraq that the Sheikh Adi footwall produces oil via Shaikan because of the 6-mile Jurassic drainage radius.

He then makes a truly bizarre remark about John Stafford. Let's look at it:

"Stafford has always challenged his old employers for being too optimistic"

What on earth does this mean?

Does it mean that Stafford is no longer at GKP and that Joseki is saying that - while he was employed at GKP - he "always challenged" his colleagues? Regardless of the former, how on earth would joseki know the latter?

Or is he saying that Stafford challenged ERC - who were his previous employer - for being too optimistic? That makes no sense whatsoever, not least because he actually did the very opposite in two GKP videos!

Or does he think that Stafford worked for DGA and that Stafford "always challenged" what they said? What evidence is there for that statement? In any case, it was ERC for whom Stafford worked, not DGA.

[gkphero] 22/10/2016 10:23

Who works for Sothic?

[mr roper] 22/10/2016 10:20

good stuff, Bob. How did you manage to record him?

[gkphero] 22/10/2016 10:17

Word on the street is GKP will be sold before year end 2016.

I expect at least 10p per share.

[joseki] 22/10/2016 10:08

It's long been established that bad information has been suppressed. SH-6 was bad, Sheikh Adi didn't flow. Obvious. the irony is The Muppets are trying to make out that good information, a super recoverable greater Shaikan has been withheld. Whilst the Kirkuk big brother story has died, the non commerciality of BB SA AB is now accepted, and hence the OIP is what it is. The final card is their embellishment of recovery factor, of which they have no factual evidence. Just because Todd JG Ainsworth said something does that mean it's the truth? Who trusts what the old BoD said? Stafford has always challenged his old employers for being too optimistic, and that's why some deluded PIs have now turned on him after the Muppets Munch.

If anyone wishes to Munch with the Muppets, head over to the grassy pastures on Last Days where they supposedly now graze.

[oil_investor] 22/10/2016 10:01

Mr Roper: yes, the FCA are aware of the withholding of information by officers at GKP, and certain names are known to them in this context. This matter is ongoing and I am not allowed by the FCA to discuss any of it.

[mr roper] 22/10/2016 09:57

Bob, I assume you contacted the FCA about this, yes?

18. Tony Peart's recorded admission that information was being withheld from the shareholders

[joharris] 22/10/2016 09:39

Interesting

[1712notout] 22/10/2016 09:32

So as the potted history continues
Minds may wander to the investment

Volumes pitiful at less than0.4%

Huge buy
😀😙😗😃8538;😗ԅ35;😃

[dudishes] 22/10/2016 09:11

First time tick up for Wildrider7 (86), not far off the mark there young lady.

Sothic disclosure, forced or lost/is that your missing millions?

Forward selling into the market, has some way to go as yet!

Above 0.86p, handsome profit. The pi's cannot grasp/or will not, as even at 9p they are doomed.

[nicebut] 22/10/2016 08:57

Wildrider,

It was the other way round.

As far as we can tell so far- The only information kept from shareholders was news held back about poor testing results of SH-6- and the poor testing of SA-1.

So Shaiken and SA fields were attributed with massive OIP figures while the company sat on the poor testing results- IE that these wells didn`t actually flow ANY oil- They were affectively dusters...But shareholders would`t have got that impression at the time. Far from it.


WildRider721 Oct '16 - 23:45 - 524586 of 524588 3 1
nest,
don't think that concealing information (from shareholders)
in order to fit the most narrow view of Shaikan, and thereby its valuation
and the massive destruction of shareholder value is of any interest to neither Cutthecagain nor Lardner23

[oliver666] 22/10/2016 00:16

BT, The judge was incorreect.Whether or not rex filed in the US and UK, it matters not. Its based on Citizenship and company registration.Pittburgh PA.

WE will differ,and thats it, but the Judge in the UK had no jurisidiction on TKI V EXCAL niether british and both part of a legally bindy agreement, and the Judge was brought off by the KRG , you dont surpress 16 pages of documents

That was tried again bY HAWRMI,Talabani WZR and all were called untruthful decietful , Hatfield was described as unfit to run a company.. Now its amazaing how having lawyers who are upto the task got this info out, that WZR KRG did everything toi surpress.

Lard, You have uyour view, that fine, dont play the game show me the evidence, its everywhere, open eyes look and see.

Re Kozel, how come is was 100% clear in 2010 with placemnsts and EBT,s same as 2009.

If Al stanton the NOMAD says this Etamic deal is bad for shareholders, then duck me, everyone who is so dam clever closed there ears and it was that bad, the company he worked for kicked GKP into touch and who arrived Stranbd Hanson.

Consider this how come Sheikh Adi had no BIR, and was 80%, and look at the other blocks that had the same, all gobe back to the Hawrmis KRG

[wildrider7] 21/10/2016 23:45

nest,
don't think that concealing information (from shareholders)
in order to fit the most narrow view of Shaikan, and thereby its valuation
and the massive destruction of shareholder value is of any interest to neither Cutthecagain nor Lardner23

after all the restructure was calculated on the level of debt against the value of the asset. A CPR that undervalue the asset has been extremely damaging to shareholders that have seen themselves diluted to near oblivion

Cut wants us to run after Kozel, but it doesn't address the current situation, shortfalls, neither will it help shareholders to recoup some of their losses. at best it satisfy one needs for vengeance
and as for Lardner23, she's just playing the gallery, curtain twitching as ever

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

nestoframpers21 Oct '16 - 22:48 - 524579 of 524585 1 0
Is the contents of the Ryder Scott Fracture report market sensitive Lard ? I think that is likely to get GKP into hot water .

[biggerthus] 21/10/2016 23:31

oliver,
If I remember correctly, Rex & co filed in NY and then in London while ignoring usual protocol.
Based on that the original Justice decided that it was within her rights to choose London as the venue, as she viewed the dual filing as vexatious & overly aggressive.

She created a precedent there, and fair enough. GKP didn't file the case - it was Rex & Co, so they were the ones who chose where to file it. Not GKP, or the judiciary.

The judge who heard the case & ruled just did his job, as the jurisdiction had already been legally decided by another judge.

----
oliver66621 Oct '16 - 20:58 - 524563 of 524582 2 0
What was the court case re Excalibur about? If say they had won, whould they have had to contribute to all back costs and forward drilling costs. Was there a TEXAS Company Hawrmi knows well that were in that mix for 30% of GKP blocks?
The odd thing is GKP V Excalibur should have been in the courts in Bermuda, amnd TKI V Excalibur should have been in NYC.

The judge wo ruled on the cases did not have jurdidiction in either cases

[iamthemoog] 21/10/2016 23:30

Its a flight to Bermuda , a laywer to petition for the company to be put under admistration by the bermuda ...

.,...........................

Oliver, you are addressing the fleeced, and the rest know their money would buy diddly squat.

Todd sold the condo after the judge forbade it, these birds are impervious at the moment,
it just needs one piece of evidence,

"all I have to do is sign a piece of paper and it reverts back to me" TL fetter lane, uk

Explain to me why this was not mentioned on any board at the time.

[lardner23] 21/10/2016 22:53

Cut, you haven't responded to a single point I made. Has the bounce has gone out of your bungee? Do you still want to play silos?

There's not much point in banging my head against obstinate partisan brick walls. I offered to help but no one can build without materials. A pity.