Greenroc Mining Share Discussion Threads

[sicilian_kan] 28/7/2022 13:20

Agreed, and the rns said early August. I’m expecting next week.

[bobdown2] 28/7/2022 10:46

Next months rns should create some interest. Hoperully there will be something forward looking in it.

[bobdown2] 26/7/2022 13:50

News soon. A 249 hole drill result from last year. I get the impression that although the share offer was at 10p last year some may have got some cheaper. Once cleared these will fly.
Yea well. Rerate anyway.

[bobdown2] 07/7/2022 14:35

Check profile

[orcaattack] 07/7/2022 03:14

At TBS if you look at the average drill depth, and spatial area drilled, you understand why the resource is delayed.

I can't see how they'll have enough tons to start feasibility studies.

[sicilian_kan] 06/7/2022 09:09

Great to see GROC yet again meeting expectations. They were due to start the Year 2 baseline studies this summer and have done so.

[oapknob1] 06/7/2022 07:13

Summer/autumn field work programme due to commence at TBS Q3 2022 with the objective of fast-tracking TBS to mine development-- Environmental Impact Assessment ("EIA") consultants, BioApp Greenland, to commence second year environmental baseline studies, providing the foundation for the development of an EIA-- Social Impact Assessment ("SIA") workshops to begin, managed by SIA consultants NIRAS A/S ('NIRAS')

[ryanrhys] 04/7/2022 09:41

This share issued at 11 now 5.5.... What a terrible buy...

Just like Alba it's a scam and no one wants it their assets!?

[sicilian_kan] 03/7/2022 10:24

Yes, but luffness, what you miss out are the facts. Greenroc is already - this summer - doing year 2 of the environmental baseline studies for both Amitsoc and Thule Black Sands. See slide 23 here:

[luffness] 03/7/2022 09:16

Google Greenland Mineral Resource Authority Guidelines for Preparing an EIA

[oapknob1] 01/7/2022 22:48

Can you post a link where it states this please. Be interested to read it."EIA requires a minimum of 2 years baseline studies "

[luffness] 28/6/2022 07:47

What he doesn't say is that the EIA requires a minimum of 2 years baseline studies - so no chance of a licence application next year...As I have said for months 5-10 years to production if they ever get there....

[oapknob1] 27/6/2022 20:12

Thule sands significant resource upgrade expected imminently 1-2 months. Amitsoq EIS/SIA commencement winter 2022.

[sicilian_kan] 27/6/2022 15:41

Presentation uploaded today:

[luffness] 24/6/2022 20:57

But just a couple of years to wait for the EIA and SIA.....

[luffness] 24/6/2022 20:56

The permafrost situation is not the same - Alba as was then had to stop at 1m. JAY stopped because of the length of the drills

[sicilian_kan] 24/6/2022 18:26

luffness, the claim was not about permafrost. Your claim was that (paraphrased):

- JAY walked away from the GROC licence because of issues to do with permafrost and walruses / narwhal populations; and

- that these issues were not issues that JAY have [in their license next door].

Have a look at this document from the JAY environmental report (that led to environmental approvals for them next door at Dundas):



At page 4, "The Project is located in a region of permafrost which extends well below the current base of the proposed pits"

At page 5, "Shallow groundwater flow occurs in the active layer during summer months...The depth of the active layer varies spatially and temporarily...with an average of 1.1m"

At page 9, "The upper most layer of ground that seasonally thaws above the permafrost is called the active layer".

Conclusion: The level of permafrost at JAY's Dundas (who got their environmental permits) is identical to the level of permafrost at GROC next door. Yet for some reason, you seem to assert, unevidenced, that the permafrost situation is different at GROC is different to JAY and that JAY walked away for that reason. You provide no evidence of these assertions which on the face of it look factually wrong.

So, I ask you again, what evidence do you have in support of any of your claims?

[luffness] 24/6/2022 17:58

2018 mineral resource was limited to 1m depth because of permafrost just look at the rns's from then....

[sicilian_kan] 24/6/2022 11:26

You've provided no evidence, just an assertion. Show me anything that backs up your claims. E.g. a link or an article proving what you have said.