We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Evr Holdings Plc | LSE:EVRH | London | Ordinary Share | GB00BD2YHN21 | ORD GBP0.01 |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.00 | 0.00% | 4.75 | 4.70 | 4.80 | - | 0.00 | 01:00:00 |
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 0 | N/A | 0 |
Date | Subject | Author | Discuss |
---|---|---|---|
24/4/2018 08:31 | No - old music doesn't make anything. Your hardcore U2 fan doesn't want to watch every single gig ever, and repeat... | igbertsponk | |
24/4/2018 08:28 | Is there any point in 7,000 hours of 2014-onward content if the users want to view the events live ? | kreature | |
24/4/2018 08:28 | It was you that my comment was aimed at not Jak. You are clueless on EVRH. | ferrisc | |
24/4/2018 08:17 | Says in the 'notes' of the RNS, "EVR, a creator of virtual reality content" Really though? How would that creation look without the creative input of the band ? 'A helper in recording vr content, maybe. | kreature | |
24/4/2018 07:28 | Ferrisc rather than name calling why not explain why Jak is so wrong. If possible post links to support your arguments. Isn't that how good debate happens? | loglorry1 | |
23/4/2018 21:07 | If it cost NextVR 7 figures to stream one Coldplay concert how can EVRH afford any content? There cash will be gone in no time. | loglorry1 | |
23/4/2018 19:47 | Iirc it cost them 7 figures, was broadcast live and is no longer available as they don't have the rights. Your point? | ferrisc | |
23/4/2018 19:10 | A nice £150,000 buy dropped in after close. That's confidence. Clearly they don't read the wise sages casting their doubt on here lol | ferrisc | |
23/4/2018 17:04 | Another day of trying to push it down and any success? | trumpingtonsmythe | |
23/4/2018 16:26 | because they don't do music. | igbertsponk | |
23/4/2018 16:21 | About NextVR NextVR is the world’s best virtual reality platform for delivering live sports and music in VR to fans globally. Launched in 2009, the company has patented technology that delivers an unparalleled VR experience providing fans extraordinary access and profound immersion. NextVR has world-class partnerships with leaders in sports and entertainment including the NBA, NFL, FOX Sports, Live Nation, and the International Champions Cup. NextVR was founded by industry leaders with decades of experience in 3D stereoscopic imaging, compression technology and VR broadcasting. For more information, visit NextVR.com. Can anyone tell me why these guys aren't streaks ahead of EVRH? | loglorry1 | |
23/4/2018 16:10 | Who with? Presumably not global players? | ferrisc | |
23/4/2018 15:41 | Nothing inside about confirming a deal with Sony etc exists. Already public info. lol yes but then the institution has done no more due diligence than your or I. The OP made it sound that these institutional investors would have done a lot more research and therefore would be sure of what they were getting into. However the RNS of the various deals are not at all precise on the contractual terms. Without knowing them we can't really infer much value at all in these contracts. It's basically taking a punt. Nothing wrong with that but just name dropping Sony means very little. | loglorry1 | |
23/4/2018 15:35 | Nothing inside about confirming a deal with Sony etc exists. Already public info. | igbertsponk | |
23/4/2018 15:34 | Oh and btw they certainly raised plenty post IPO too I'd agree not much if anything from institutional investors however. Oh and here is a corker where they annonce deals with major high street retailers Needless to say non of this ever led to a single penny of sales. just saying.... | loglorry1 | |
23/4/2018 15:28 | CTAG never RNS’d deals iirc. There’s the difference You are joking! They RNS'd that they had a deal and gave numbers and IIRC raised of the back of that only for that deal to never materialise! Log | loglorry1 | |
23/4/2018 15:27 | Investors like Blueport and Schroders had the chance to do proper due diligence on the contracts with the music majors etc. Really? And how do they do that? Surely if these contracts are not in the public domain then one investor would be taken inside and would not be able to deal if they had material inside information? I think you are totally mistaken on this one. Institutions would need to be very careful not to be wall crossed on this sort of thing otherwise they would not be able to deal. If they did the reputational damage would be massive. | loglorry1 |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions