Connemara Share Discussion Threads

[caveat_emptor] 11/5/2013 17:24

Trading the stock sub judice is probably something the
guys in London would look at, but have you ever heard
of a compliance investigation into an exploration stock
on the ISEQ...don't make me laugh!!!

[richgit] 11/5/2013 16:30

Such a baseless court case would normally only be enacted by someone
that would consider the costs as a cheap arbitrage to buying a falling stock
price that such a nonsense may create.

Arguably the best example of that is the one of Excalibur vs GKP where the
court costs are in the £Millions,yet those financing it are possibly making
a multiple of that from expertly manipulating GKP`s stock price,where they
will possibly come out of it with a position they simply cannot lose from,
and most certainly beyond the court costs.

I don`t quite know what Mark`s game plan is here,though maybe all the nonsense
and some not realising this was so obviously a one decison situation,may
have sold Con stock,yet like most on Aim it would possibly have fallen anyway.

[caveat_emptor] 11/5/2013 12:45

Foul mouthed pillock!!!!

[the diddymen] 11/5/2013 11:49

share_sprat, how do you think that CON should dig itself out of the hole it is in?

[the diddymen] 11/5/2013 11:47

What a complete load of bollix.

Hardy was trying to look after his interests. It will have no impact on CON because Hardy will no doubt have to pay the costs.

So where does that leave Trampus... pari passu with every other mug that has invested in a Clontarf company. I suspect that Hardy is highly embarrassed that he finds himself in the same boat as other CON investors.

What are CON investors doing about it. Nothing because there is nothing they can do internally or externally because they do not have a BoD with sufficient gravitas to get them out of the hole they have been led into. What a stunning victory!

[share_shark] 10/5/2013 19:42

sallad3

What are your views on the judge and her summing up ?.

[goulding1215] 10/5/2013 19:35

Bollix R2 D2.


Sour grapes then lickspittle R2 D2? The case was so weak, that it wasn't newsworthy of an rns as proved by the judge's summing up. A damning verdict on Hardy and you.

[mike111d] 10/5/2013 19:32

Just back from a few days in the Cotswolds and so only seeing this news now. Well not a holder here but this is excellent news and all very much as expected. I hope for your sake that you have relevant insurance cover sallad, well actually in truth I would rather that you did not.

So what do we know, sallad has confirmed that he does not have the interests of any 162 group company shareholder at heart just his own; that ADVFN have seen fit to ban his prior avatars for making unsubstantiated and inappropriate claims and finally that the judge presiding over this case has just decided to kick his claim against CON into touch. This all points to a total lack of credibility IMO.

[caveat_emptor] 10/5/2013 19:22

You do sound so like lettusshead!!!!

May be in Alter Ego terms...
Sallad3 is Hardy the Chartered Accountant
and
R2D2 is the intrepid lawyer.

Eh?

[up just a little bit] 10/5/2013 18:06

Loser lettuce AGAIN.

[caveat_emptor] 10/5/2013 17:36

And so do thousands of AIM listed companies
over the last 20 years.
Watch out for RNS's from your favourite
speculative share at 16.31pm every Friday.

What's yer point?

Caveat Emptor!!!

[r 2 d 2] 10/5/2013 17:12

Where was the RNS that stated there ever was a High Court case for winding up the company ?

It proves yet again, Clontarf Road companies like to issue good news pronto via RNS.... but bad news is not... that's tucked away in the results.

That could be the case for CLON ?

[caveat_emptor] 10/5/2013 16:38

How many days did the Court sit?
Ouch!!!
I read it (upside down) and it seemd to me
that the petition failed on every test...so why
should the company be held liable for all or
any part of their costs...?

[goulding1215] 10/5/2013 16:34

Well, you asked for it lettucehead. What was your point?

Connemara Mining plc ("Connemara" or the "Company")

High Court Ruling

The High Court in Dublin today dismissed the application by Trampus Ltd to wind up the Company. Connemara has applied for costs. This application will be heard next week.

Trampus is not and never has been a creditor of Connemara.

#23 bites the dust. Could cost you a packet.

[caveat_emptor] 10/5/2013 16:27

And how much did that little exercise cost lettucehead?

[ruthie] 10/5/2013 16:17

Quote from judgement:

"The petition is dismissed and that is the end of the matter."

[currypasty] 10/5/2013 15:14

50k buy, all must be well

[sallad3] 10/5/2013 14:59

The judgment is available as a pdf at:

www.box.com/s/p1fujtewx8xafyx2wi3t

[sallad3] 09/5/2013 19:44

Might be news tomorrow

IN COURT 3
MISS JUSTICE LAFFOY
....................
AT 2.00 O'CLOCK
2013 30 COS CONNEMARA MINING CO PLC -V- COMPANIES ACT 1963 TO 2012 1400

[up just a little bit] 07/5/2013 15:49

Sallad I have 25K I would like to invest mid term in the mining sector . How would it fair in your company over a five year period?
Can you show me what I may expect from your track record?

[sallad3] 06/5/2013 22:20

We should all worry about the email the audit partner from Deloittes sent me over the weekend!

Mary Laffoy is well known for "taking her time".