Connemara Share Discussion Threads

[currypasty] 06/6/2013 17:48

such as ? there are only a dozen names, and they only had a handful of shares.

I see my participation is hidden in with a broker.

[hvs] 06/6/2013 15:50

CAPITULATION.

Enjoy !!!!!

[hvs] 05/6/2013 14:45

Long may the capitulation last.

IT WAS ALL A BIG CITY MADE CON.

ITS KNOWS BEST,

LIke appointing FURSE to The B OF E

[sallad3] 05/6/2013 14:26

Interesting names on the lists of those who took part in the placing for anyone who is interested. www.cro.ie

[hvs] 03/6/2013 09:16

The BIG CON is coming home to roost.

[pvb] 18/5/2013 16:15

'ello, 'ello! Is this the official homoboy "It's the weekend, I'm stoned - WTF" thread?

Only asking, like...

[caveat_emptor] 18/5/2013 11:33

It really does make you want to ask why Connemara's legal team
did not petition to have it's costs guaranteed before the Court
Case started?

Surely the Court itself must have had reservations about
the plaintiff's ability to pay and it's history in this regard?

[goulding1215] 18/5/2013 09:58

He won't pay any costs as it is down to Trampus. He will just close down Trampus.

[up just a little bit] 18/5/2013 07:29

#23 failed.

Who will pay his costs. He is bust.

[goulding1215] 18/5/2013 06:58

These excerpts from the courts summing up reveal Hardy's lack of any credibility. However, he is so vain glorious he cannot admit that he was ill-advised to even contemplate such an action doomed to failure from the start. He even goes so far as to claim justification in his action. Weird or what:-



Some of my preferred quotes from the judgement:

Paragraph 46: "...questions about the Petitioner's credibility and concerns about his purpose in presenting the petition are certainly raised."

Paragraph 49: "...the Petitioner's assertion that...it is highly unlikely that the Company will be able to raise significant funds through a share issue in the near future. Apart from its speculative nature, that contention would seem to be at variance with the Petitioner's own activity after 28th June, 2012 in enlarging its shareholding....At this point in time the Company does not need to raise funding to discharge its debts as they fall due."

And my personal favourite:

Paragraph 19: "....Notwithstanding that, taking an overview of the position adopted by the Petitioner, it has to be said that it is so fundamentally riddled with inconsistencies and clear contradictions, that a question inevitably arises as to the Petitioner's true intention."

I for one am very interested in what you have to say sallad. Aimho.

[up just a little bit] 16/5/2013 11:04

Going to show that in your late accounts are we?

[up just a little bit] 16/5/2013 11:03

sallad,

How much money do you owe if costs?

Seen as you lost .

[emilio] 16/5/2013 08:51

salladplotschn 18

loooosssaaa

[sallad3] 16/5/2013 08:24

Up Yours

Whatever sum is finally agreed and paid is added to the carrying value of the investment - bit like adding directors salaries to mine development costs.

[up just a little bit] 16/5/2013 01:41

How much costs are you going to have to pay.


When the award went against you all the vile avatars appeared en masse.




FACT


Game set and matched eh!!!!

[up just a little bit] 16/5/2013 01:39

Sallad,
Dozens of posts as sallad




Sallad2



Sallad 3




mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm.


LOl



Bust again.

[sallad3] 15/5/2013 23:57

Ruthie

4 posts since 2000? and all on this thread. Hmmm

[mike111d] 15/5/2013 12:20

As I was saying sallad, you do appear to have been hoisted by your own petard.

Tick, tock, tick, tock.