Connemara Share Discussion Threads

[up just a little bit] 15/5/2013 12:11

#23 and bust.

[ruthie] 15/5/2013 12:04

The High Court have awarded full costs against Hardy

[up just a little bit] 15/5/2013 10:03

One should not be surprised by a fool with a track record.

[ruthie] 15/5/2013 09:59

Some of my preferred quotes from the judgement:

Paragraph 46: "...questions about the Petitioner's credibility and concerns about his purpose in presenting the petition are certainly raised."

Paragraph 49: "...the Petitioner's assertion that...it is highly unlikely that the Company will be able to raise significant funds through a share issue in the near future. Apart from its speculative nature, that contention would seem to be at variance with the Petitioner's own activity after 28th June, 2012 in enlarging its shareholding....At this point in time the Company does not need to raise funding to discharge its debts as they fall due."

And my personal favourite:

Paragraph 19: "....Notwithstanding that, taking an overview of the position adopted by the Petitioner, it has to be said that it is so fundamentally riddled with inconsistencies and clear contradictions, that a question inevitably arises as to the Petitioner's true intention."

I for one am very interested in what you have to say sallad.

[homeboy35] 14/5/2013 14:03

Nope. Just thought I would post relevant stuff here again after forgetting about it for the last year.

[traderabc] 14/5/2013 13:44

Homeboy, strange I can see 117 of 132 then the next post is 132 of 132.
15 posts have disappeared, can you see them?

[mike111d] 14/5/2013 12:16

Well sallad, as I was saying could it be that you are going to me embarrassed Re CLON just as you have been here? Tick, tock, tick, tock.

[currypasty] 14/5/2013 09:20

can someone cut and paste the sum up?

[up just a little bit] 14/5/2013 08:58

And as for what the judge said....
Oh yes



YOU LOST.

[up just a little bit] 14/5/2013 08:57

There is a rotation coming sallad, if you can understand that.

[homeboy35] 14/5/2013 07:36

Syria: The Next Domino to Fall? Is a Major US-NATO Military Intervention Looming?

Israeli intelligence announced last month that they had evidence of the Syrian government using chemical weapons. An independent UN investigation however could not substantiate these claims.

To the contrary, Commission member Carla Del Ponte announced that chemical weapons more likely were used by the rebel groups.

Adding to the tensions was the recent airstrikes by Israel against Syrian targets, claiming the lives of 300 soldiers according to some estimates.

Legitimate concerns have been raised about human rights violations in Syria.

However, history has proven that geo-strategy, control of resources, and military positioning are higher priorities for the major powers.

[mike111d] 13/5/2013 21:45

No just having a little fun at your expense.

So when might the Trampus accounts finally get filled then, or am I being a little presumptuous in assuming that they will get filled.

It looks to me like you may end up being hoisted by your own petard.

[sallad3] 13/5/2013 21:38

Up Yours

Always knew you couldn't read.... the paras are there for all to see.

Is your computer so old it doesn't offer a rotate facility or are you just too stupid... or both?

3d

Are you so simple? What did the judge say?

[mike111d] 13/5/2013 20:34

So then sallad, what's the damage?

[share_shark] 13/5/2013 17:12

Ruthie.

Would be so kind as to provide a link which we can open ?.

TIA

[ruthie] 13/5/2013 16:44

www.box.com/s/p1fujtewx8xafyx2wi3t

Read with interest, especially the last 3 lines of paragraph 19, the last 3 lines of paragraph 46, and paragraph 49.

[up just a little bit] 13/5/2013 10:39

What is the situation after CON receive costs but potentially Trampus is declared insolvent and company #23 bites the dust?

[share_shark] 13/5/2013 07:23

21 Reasons to buy physical gold. Mining Maven latest.

[mclellan] 12/5/2013 20:28

Interesting point, Mike111D

[caveat_emptor] 12/5/2013 14:14

Not so, if we are to believe the Sunday Times......

[mike111d] 12/5/2013 12:15

So where might this leave Trampus and the late filing of their accounts, which I recall where delayed pending the outcome of this hearing. Perhaps it would be prudent for Trampus to await confirmation of any costs to be awarded against them.

[harrissen] 12/5/2013 06:36

Sunday 12 May 2013



Connemara Mining plc, whose executive chairman is Mr Teeling, insisted the company was solvent and able to pay its debts.

It had opposed a winding-up petition brought by UK mining finance company Trampus Ltd, which is the largest single shareholder in Connemara at 6.32 pc. Mr Teeling and another director, James Finn, who both also opposed the winding up as creditors, own 7.78pc between them.

Trampus argued it should be wound up because it was insolvent and that it would be just and equitable to do so.

The company and the directors said no grounds had been demonstrated for winding up on a just and equitable basis and it was able to pay its debts when they fall due.