We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cloudtag | LSE:CTAG | London | Ordinary Share | KYG2215A1076 | ORD 0.1P (DI) |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.00 | 0.00% | 2.875 | - | 0.00 | 01:00:00 |
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 0 | N/A | 0 |
Date | Subject | Author | Discuss |
---|---|---|---|
21/5/2017 13:17 | Noddy No need for the childish rebukes, it only belittles you and your statue as CTAG information guru. I have already shown where you have lied, go back to the original posts. All the rest you are attempting since being caught out is bluster old chap. You will have to apologise for not adding a correction to your intention to mislead any readers here. Some of these have also picked up on your misleading and purposely inaccurate post in question. Do not rely on others to come to your defense here, you must by now be big enough and old enough to take responsibility for your own actions. I cannot believe I am sat here on a Sunday afternoon, correcting you again, have you no shame old chap. GB | goldbullion | |
21/5/2017 13:10 | bbmsionlypostafter Is your name Nod or Noddy? if not, then please mind your own business, as my posts are directed at the aforementioned. GB | goldbullion | |
21/5/2017 12:00 | Nod21 May '17 - 02:03 - 731 of 737 0 0 (premium) Andy, yes, it seem odd to hold the share register in Jersey when the company registrar is Computershare Investor Service (Cayman) Limited. Is it a mistake by Amit? ------- Nod21, No, it's just that Computershare Jersey also administers companies registered in the Cayman islands, and one or two other offshore jurisdictions. I guess it's not financially viable for a stand alone office for each area. | andy | |
21/5/2017 10:32 | GB, A potty training grandaddy sounds like the perfect task for you. | nod | |
21/5/2017 10:24 | GB, I haven't lied about anything. I have stated facts - lots of facts - which you simply ignore and tell your fanciful stories. Here's a fact... CTAG was delisted from AIM on 28 March 2017. Here we are, two months later and Cloudtag Inc still claims on its web site to be listed on AIM. Who is misleading who? "Cloudtag Inc. (CTAG: LON) is a London Stock Exchange AIM listed company bringing ..." 19th May 2017 CloudTag (CTAG:LN), the company that brings personal monitoring to the wellbeing, fitness and digital health markets, announces ... Is CTAG:LN listed somewhere? Financial sites say CTAG:LN is delisted but Cloudtag Inc indicates otherwise. | nod | |
21/5/2017 08:37 | gb, You seem far more interested in & incensed by (alleged) lies posted on this board than proven lies told by the Board of CTAG, lies that suckered in thousands of naive mugs & burnt £millions. Why's that? | bbmsionlypostafter | |
21/5/2017 08:17 | WShak your 726 post is a waste of time, not sure why you are regurgitating the same old subject, you are not our Noddy are you. My point is not about what is presented, it is not about CTAG or anything else for that matter. My point is about how Noddy blatantly told some lies on this site to make his post stand out. This is just about presentation of facts, which I think should be presented well if you are a self proclaimed guru on CTAG, like our Noddy seems to think so. He wrote something giving it as a fact, where it was an opinion. We do not want to mislead anyone do we Mr Shakoor, do we? I have asked him to correct it and give a apology, if he cannot or will not do that, then I will forever highlight his previous or even continuous lies and alteration of opinions to come across as facts. Jolly poor show from our guru Mr Noddy, reminds me a little of my two year old grandson George, when he goes into a strop, he will throw plenty of child fits, stamp around in anger and make up stories. He will never admit to being wrong, and will blame everyone in the house except himself. I am now trying to train him to be normal, and at the same time potty train him. I could offer these services to Noddy if he needs help. GB | goldbullion | |
21/5/2017 02:21 | WSHak, You wrote: "The reason that I think Second Chance were in on this is that they were happy to put their name to a fake $5.2m order, and gave some strange answers to those that asked them questions late last year. I'll leave it at that."You may be right but it doesn't seem logical.If Second Chance was part of a fraud why would they quit now? It would seem logical that they would continue and and receive whatever payments they received, including their work on the shows.On the other hand, if Second Chance has only recently discovered it was conned and there will be no product, then it would most certainly end the partnership. SC would not be alone in being duped - thousands of shareholders were. | nod | |
21/5/2017 02:11 | Amit is continuing to claim CTAG is AIM listed. He uses the EPIC in his most recent shareholder update and the About Us page begins with a statement that it is listed on AIM. A bit dodgy.http://www.clo | nod | |
21/5/2017 02:03 | Andy, yes, it seem odd to hold the share register in Jersey when the company registrar is Computershare Investor Service (Cayman) Limited. Is it a mistake by Amit?Amit Ben-Haim is the only Executive Director of Cloudtag Inc.He has given a reorganisation update, refers to CT Technology Services Ltd but does not actually declare that he has resigned as director of CT Technology Services, whose only director now is Massimo Ventimiglia.Amit says he wants to focus on Cloudtag Inc where he is the only Exec Director and probably the only employee. CTAG has recently appointed a non-Exec director but he will not be an employee, being non-Exec. | nod | |
20/5/2017 18:23 | This below is from the Worthington (WRN) LSE thread. Does anyone remember who it was that did a very similar table of how much shorters were going to lose on CTAG if it went to the absurd heights the rampers were predicting? Was it DavidGreece or Aberdeenman or someone else? Whoever it was he's back with a new ID. This is so much like CTAG shorters table that it's impossible it's a coincidence... giantsquid Posts: 595 Off Topic Opinion: Strong Buy Price: 87.00 If share price opened @........ Today 15:50 If share price opened @ 10p £1000 would buy 10,000 shares 10,000 shares X £5 share price = £50K 10,000 shares X £10 share price = £100K £10,000 would buy 100,000 shares 100,000 shares X £5 share price = £500,000 100,000 shares X £10 share price = £1 million If share price opened @ 25p £1000 would buy 4000 shares 4000 shares X £5 share price = £20,000 4000 shares X £10 share price = £40,000 £10,000 would buy 40,000 shares 40,000 shares X £5 share price = £200,000 40,000 shares X £10 share price = £400,000 If share price opened @ 50p £1000 would buy 2000 shares 2000 shares X £5 share price = £10,000 2000 shares X £10 share price = £20,000 £10,000 would buy 20,000 shares 20,000 shares X £5 share price = £100,000 20,000 shares X £10 share price = £200,000 If share price opened @ 75p £1000 would buy 1333 shares 1333 shares X £5 share price = £6665 1333 shares X £10 share price = £13,330 £10,000 would buy 13,333 shares 13,333 shares X £5 share price = £66,666 13,333 shares X £10 share price = £133,330 If share price opened @ £1 £1000 would buy 1000 shares 1000 shares X £5 share price = £5,000 1000 shares X £10 share price = £10,000 £10,000 would buy 10,000 shares 10,000 shares X £5 share price = £50,000 10,000 shares X £10 share price = £100,000 | bbmsionlypostafter | |
20/5/2017 13:50 | Don't know about any of you but I'm really looking forward to Aberdeenman's on site review of the Onitor from the Chinese CES. | bbmsionlypostafter | |
20/5/2017 12:49 | 19th May 2017 CloudTag (CTAG:LN), the company that brings personal monitoring to the wellbeing, fitness and digital health markets, announces that further to the de-listing from AIM, the Crest Depository Interests (CDIs) have been cancelled and the ISIN has now been disabled in CREST and no further trade movements can be settled. Former CDI holders will be transferred to the Company’s share register held in Jersey and share certificates will be issued to those shareholders and dispatched within five business days. Any questions regarding this process should be made to the Company’s registrar, Computershare Investor Service (Cayman) Limited. ------- Interesting, because when I contacted Computershare in Jersey, they told me they no longer acted for CTAG! | andy | |
20/5/2017 12:27 | GB,I think, to rely on anything that CTAG state (even in writing) being factual, is where you are going wrong. Evidence would suggest that they are as likely to lie and mislead about the state of affairs as they are to tell the truth.I agree that none of us can state with certainty what is going on, just as we cannot guarantee that, should a coin be flipped 10,000 times, it will at some point come up "heads".At some point, one has to make an educated guess, however. Given the number of red flags/lies emanating from CTAG, shareholders were always betting that "heads" was never going to show in the above example. It wasn't a great bet ... | wshak | |
20/5/2017 12:21 | Busy today? So there has been an update - probably Just before a fund raising.. | knigel | |
20/5/2017 12:17 | WShak Not really interested in his research or what he knows. I am interested in how he puts over his opinion to fact on several conclusions old chap. What I am saying in a round about way, is how he lies from time to time. Noddy can be the information guru of CTAG all he likes, but he must keep it real and show where he is opinionated or factual. Simple really, yesterdays case point was pretty conclusive. GB | goldbullion | |
20/5/2017 12:06 | GB,I think you are out of your depth arguing with Nod - he has probably carried out more research than anyone else here on CTAG.Nod, The reason that I think Second Chance were in on this is that they were happy to put their name to a fake $5.2m order, and gave some strange answers to those that asked them questions late last year. I'll leave it at that. | wshak | |
20/5/2017 11:23 | Multi million £££ .........CloudTag is pleased to announce that it has received delivery of Onitor Track devices from its Manufacturing facility in Malaysia. These products are being delivered to its UK distributors and the US distributor with whom the Company is currently engaged and will be circulated. CloudTag is also pleased to announce that David He, Chief Strategy and Data Officer will be representing CloudTag attending CES Shanghai on 7-9 June, during which meetings with potential partners will take place. | bbmsionlypostafter | |
20/5/2017 11:06 | Well old Noddy is one of those types who will not admit his errors, even in the face of compelling evidence. All that long post above to wriggle out of the one line I was referring to, what a waste of time old chap. All the others picked up on your error, as did Andy. One cannot be right all the time Noddy, and one must be prepared to eat humble pie when he gets it so wrong. So man up and step forward, and accept it like a man. I will say no more about your misrepresentation of facts after. GB | goldbullion | |
19/5/2017 21:36 | GB,You appear to be new to CTAG so perhaps are unaware that timely and full reporting has never been CTAG's strong point. Whether it be reporting the sale of shares by major shareholders or reporting company reorganisation, the facts take CTAG many months or years to announce. Economy of facts was probably one of the reasons CTAG were suspended and obliged to come clean with many facts on restoration of trading on 15 December 2016. It was not to last of course as not a single nomad in the U.K. would accept CTAG as a client. CTAG is no longer listed and is not obliged to announce important events (not that it kept within the AIM rules when listed).As your challenge to me relates to reorganisations and the departure of CTAG directors from CT Technology Services Ltd, here are more facts for you to digest.On 24 March 2016, Amit Ben-Haim and Anthony Reeves resigned as directors of Cloudtag Active Ltd and Massimo Ventimiglia was appointed the same day as Cloudtag Active's sole director. As discussed on advfn boards in March / April 2016, Massimo is employed to close Limited companies.This reorganisation was not announced by CTAG until its RNS dated 15 December 2016. It took CTAG more than 8 months to announce this reorganisation.Follo | nod | |
19/5/2017 13:30 | Goldbullion, You are correct, CTAG have not made such an announcement (yet!), but Massimo has a history of appearing just before these winding up events, so whilst it is speculation, it's based upon his track record. | andy | |
19/5/2017 13:27 | No, I guess not. | funkmasterp12 |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions