Cloudified Share Discussion Threads

[neo26] 25/3/2019 11:17

Using Noor statement which they themselves struck out.Unbelievable...

[jamesss1] 25/3/2019 11:02

I don't see the point in ICSID if the standard of ruling is so poor.I havent even read it but know I will be blushing with embarrassment for ICSID and their squirming just to appease their buddies back at the office.

[wulber] 25/3/2019 10:08

TBH James, can't be bothered reading it and probably just infuriate me more.It is what it is, a fudge to protect their own.Now fingers crossed that CC/CHL/Pala join forces to take this away from ICSID, with stay of costs and funding and punish ROI!

[jnbrw] 25/3/2019 10:06

That article pulls back the cosy covers and show what a shambolic, corrupt and incestuos bed the arbiters are all lying in.

Totally unacceptable and unfit for purpose in the 21st century.

[jamesss1] 25/3/2019 09:51

Has anyone read the excuses that ICSID have issued to our anullment application?I read about 5 pages and lost interest straight away...may try a bit later for what it's worth.
P.s I'm only able to write posts on certain members replies as Andy still has me blocked.

. ..good work ;)

[jamie414] 25/3/2019 02:26

Deffo in for pound Wulber lol

[jamie414] 25/3/2019 02:23

confiscation of what?! we LOST we took it to annulment and LOST! you are the punter who is holding onto the betting slip of a beechers brook faller with the neck and head decapitated however hoping it will get up on it's merry feet and win the race lolabsolute CUCKOOConfiscation orders hahaha

[jamie414] 25/3/2019 02:16

I'll even include some fadge pics lol

[jamie414] 25/3/2019 02:10

Well offer to buy then? mine are not a lot however pm me and I'll sell at 2p

[jamie414] 25/3/2019 02:07

it's [e-mail]

[judijudi] 24/3/2019 21:13

Ta Ra then
Shut the door on your way out, there’s a good lad

[nico115] 24/3/2019 18:30

No Judi Was going to save us But your continual disrespect and rudeness means (after days of serious deliberation) that I have thrown in the white towel I won't be saving this companyI've now written off my investment Gutted but we are now 0p with no way back ..sorry

[wulber] 24/3/2019 17:42

Its enforceable, so confiscation of overseas assets for resale or direct deduction from world bank funding to ROI. Many ways to collect.

[wulber] 24/3/2019 17:40

I would have said that if this was a fair level playing field case and we'd lost then the large investors would walk away.As we have been royally screwed over (pardon the pun) and we were completely stitched up like a kipper by ICSID, l think Pala et al must be thinking, same scenario, same case but different legal jurisdiction, we would win.If the prize is simply the original $70mn investment back then that surely must be worth $1,000,000 funding to get back 35 times your investment at a 50% haircut, providing stay of cost.I really don't know of course, but my gut says in for a penny in for a pound!

[bigman786] 24/3/2019 17:35

If we did go through a non ICISD court, how do we claim property / cash from ROI if we were to win

[judijudi] 24/3/2019 17:23

Nico will save us. Again
:)
:)

[neo26] 24/3/2019 15:47

Jack Nice article Jack, there appears to be options but its all about the funding at the moment and whether the large investors have an appetite to continue.

[jack1236] 24/3/2019 08:27

As a side note Fraport gets quoted in the Annulment; the President of the Ad Hoc Committee was a arbitrator in the Fraport case.

[jack1236] 24/3/2019 08:05

The following document will help unravel the 'maze' created by the AD Hoc Committee -

[nico115] 23/3/2019 23:27

I would happily sell my shares for 2p!!!

[nico115] 23/3/2019 23:26

Bore off judiIt's over here

[abeygale] 23/3/2019 21:41

I expect not many would want to sell their shares for 2p if they could during this suspension. As they be too paranoid of another chance happening here.

[neo26] 23/3/2019 20:43

500k from large investors, definately doable, how much of pala money do they have left.