ADVFN Logo ADVFN

We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.

Trending Now

Toplists

It looks like you aren't logged in.
Click the button below to log in and view your recent history.

Hot Features

Registration Strip Icon for default Register for Free to get streaming real-time quotes, interactive charts, live options flow, and more.

CHL Cloudified Holdings Limited

4.00
0.00 (0.00%)
17 May 2024 - Closed
Delayed by 15 minutes
Share Name Share Symbol Market Type Share ISIN Share Description
Cloudified Holdings Limited LSE:CHL London Ordinary Share VGG3338A1158 ORD NPV (DI)
  Price Change % Change Share Price Bid Price Offer Price High Price Low Price Open Price Shares Traded Last Trade
  0.00 0.00% 4.00 3.00 5.00 4.00 3.45 4.00 21,261 08:00:23
Industry Sector Turnover Profit EPS - Basic PE Ratio Market Cap
Business Services, Nec 4.57M 1.49M 0.2821 0.74 1.09M
Cloudified Holdings Limited is listed in the Business Services sector of the London Stock Exchange with ticker CHL. The last closing price for Cloudified was 4p. Over the last year, Cloudified shares have traded in a share price range of 3.45p to 12.50p.

Cloudified currently has 5,264,212 shares in issue. The market capitalisation of Cloudified is £1.09 million. Cloudified has a price to earnings ratio (PE ratio) of 0.74.

Cloudified Share Discussion Threads

Showing 70126 to 70146 of 70750 messages
Chat Pages: Latest  2806  2805  2804  2803  2802  2801  2800  2799  2798  2797  2796  2795  Older
DateSubjectAuthorDiscuss
30/3/2019
16:21
ROI has never filed a 'defence' to CHL's claim.
jack1236
30/3/2019
16:19
jack

good point.

The tribunal should have said to roi deal with the forgery in your state and when thats done you can bring it here.

CHL brought the forestry case to icsid, they should have address that, the fact that roi didnt want to share the police files icsid should have left forgery till roi dealt with it in indonesia.

neo26
30/3/2019
16:07
neo26

It needs a complete analysis of the Award and Annulment; then post that on Twitter. Add page numbers for reference; embarrass the Tribunal and Ad Hoc Committee. We need to check with the 'boss' first.

jack1236
30/3/2019
16:06
come on guys get on twitter and call them out, its the only way.

lets make it difficult for all of them.

neo26
30/3/2019
15:54
Washington US judges wouldn't let him hide; especially with the snapps.
jack1236
30/3/2019
15:52
Which court? Maybe chl can sue noor.That 9m is holding us back...
neo26
30/3/2019
15:47
CHL / CC need to get Noor into a court of law; see if he runs, hides and resigns.
jack1236
30/3/2019
15:46
JackIts wasnt putra who got a private jet it was Noor.We were never given the chance to question noor this heavily favoured roi..Those questions u are asking would have asked him
neo26
30/3/2019
15:41
JackYou make good point, why didnt roi bring up the forgery in 2012 at icsid...
neo26
30/3/2019
15:40
Neo but still revoked the licenses because of 'forestry issues'. I'd like to know exactly how he found out; maybe Putra tried to get him to sign others and he went back and checked. Even so he had a duty to come forward and declare everything he knew.
jack1236
30/3/2019
15:39
Everyone get on Twitter... ;))
neo26
30/3/2019
15:31
JackHe said in march 2010 when he converted the licenses to exploitation licenses it was putra who was dealing with them he just signed.But in sept 2010 he found the licenses were dodgy.
neo26
30/3/2019
15:25
neo

That's even worse (I'm going by the Tempo article); so it was 4 years later that it was introduced into case. Does he say how he found out? He's 100% complicit.

jack1236
30/3/2019
15:16
JackIn his witness statement to icsid he stated, that in sept 2010 he found out the licenses and docs were fraudulent.
neo26
30/3/2019
14:32
If Noor knew in 2012 (Tempo article) that the licences were forged, how did he know?
Was he told by someone?

Was it the practice of the Regency as Ishak was away for months canvassing for elections?

Did he find out by himself, but decided to say nothing (until coal was found)?

Was he actually a willing participant in the fraud?

Did he privately auction the land after a resource was found?

Why weren't the licenses 'revoked' for fraud?

DQ not knowing the licences were signed by hand is a 'moot' point, as he was not dealing with the licenses at the time.

jack1236
30/3/2019
13:05
NickThe logbook was reviewed by both parties but rois excuse was that Putra gave photocopies to registrar and promised to give originals later, according to them he never did.How convenient they remember that but other issues they forgot because it happened such along time ago.Criminal what happened to chl...With regards to whistleblower, i think that person will value his life, no one in Indonesia will be stupid enough to go against the state.
neo26
30/3/2019
10:55
Can they get hold off the police files? If they can it will destroy narrative that ridlatama were the chief instigators and the award fails.
neo26
30/3/2019
10:50
'The apparent conflict between EU Law and Investment Arbitration has opened the door to the active interest of the stakeholders involved in this relationship. In particular, the European Commission has played different roles; while in some cases the Commission has been characterised as a friend of the court (amicus curiae) it has also adopted a more adversarial role as an investigating authority.

Under ICSID Rules (Rule 37), the Commission has frequently participated as a non-disputing party by submitting amicus curiae opinions.'

jack1236
30/3/2019
10:16
"Inner mafia" he calls them...Kaufmann, berg and our german arbitrator in annulment are part of the small elite mafia club....We had no chance....
neo26
30/3/2019
08:24
Jack,


Agreed, hence my question.

andy
30/3/2019
06:56
Andy, if the PCoA can't 'stay costs' then it just doesn't make sense; as costs is part of the case.
jack1236
Chat Pages: Latest  2806  2805  2804  2803  2802  2801  2800  2799  2798  2797  2796  2795  Older