ADVFN Logo ADVFN

We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.

Trending Now

Toplists

It looks like you aren't logged in.
Click the button below to log in and view your recent history.

Hot Features

Registration Strip Icon for monitor Customisable watchlists with full streaming quotes from leading exchanges, such as LSE, NASDAQ, NYSE, AMEX, Bovespa, BIT and more.

CSH Civitas Social Housing Plc

79.80
0.00 (0.00%)
Last Updated: 01:00:00
Delayed by 15 minutes
Share Name Share Symbol Market Type Share ISIN Share Description
Civitas Social Housing Plc LSE:CSH London Ordinary Share GB00BD8HBD32 ORD 1P
  Price Change % Change Share Price Bid Price Offer Price High Price Low Price Open Price Shares Traded Last Trade
  0.00 0.00% 79.80 79.70 80.20 - 0.00 01:00:00
Industry Sector Turnover Profit EPS - Basic PE Ratio Market Cap
0 0 N/A 0

Civitas Social Housing Share Discussion Threads

Showing 32076 to 32099 of 32300 messages
Chat Pages: 1292  1291  1290  1289  1288  1287  1286  1285  1284  1283  1282  1281  Older
DateSubjectAuthorDiscuss
20/1/2023
13:24
Capex can only come from reduced rents/extra rent frees - as at least some of HOMEs tenants are demanding
williamcooper104
20/1/2023
13:23
Yep - SOHO is clearly at risk - I've no crystal ball but if there's a major reset in values then likely covenants are breached Lenders are being hyper aggressive on covenants; and why not even if values half they can often get out at par and there's plenty of PE money circulating to "help" borrowers who don't have the equity to cure an LTV breach So the risk is either expensive mezz/loan to own or distressed rights issue Before anyone mentions the homeless - you've probably stayed at some point in a hotel in administration and not noticed - all of this can happen without any impact on tenancy
williamcooper104
20/1/2023
13:18
@pmuysgrove123 - correct me if I'm wrong (my expertise is mainly HOME), but have CSH actually built anything? Or bought anything newly built? HOME haven't - an SPV buys up some HMOs, flogs them to another SPV, which sells them on to HOME. Many are ready-tenanted.
spectoacc
20/1/2023
13:13
@williamcooper104

Do your comments at #547 extend to SOHO too (gearing c.38%)?

dlp6666
20/1/2023
12:59
WC

CSH

Similar, perhaps their assets are better run, but they won’t escape lease restructuring, and they don’t look like they have the balance sheet for it, so distressed rights issue or worse

Can you please explain? The issue is tenants can't afford the inflation indexation but simply remedied by negotiation. Would this be a default of a debt obligation?

If not, why will CSH need a rescue RI? LTV is 33% and plenty of headroom?

ghhghh
20/1/2023
12:41
Having been an RSL developer I can assure you that not all have been "bandits". As an example; the cost of a 60 flat scheme would be about £8 million (and before anyone gets their calculators out and says that it as a lot for 60 flats don't forget that in a SSL scheme each flat requires a further 40% of floor space for communal areas). The only way to get that to stack up against 25 years of rent (which is in itself capped) is to get further capital either from central Government or charities. The regulators are well aware of all of these figures and will not wish to stop any further developments to allow vulnerable people to live in their own homes rather than in expensive institutions or, even worse, hospital.
pmusgrove123
20/1/2023
12:08
The developers have been making out like bandits, and this has heavily inflated asset prices and rents (assuming the REITs aren't telling porkies about their rental income). The regulator won't want that situation to continue. Whether they have the clout to do anything about it, I don't know. I'm just wondering whether the Home situation will be what breaks the dam.
lucydesouza
20/1/2023
11:09
Why do you think the CSH leases will be restructured? The Regulator will not wish to increase the cost of capital in this market. They would wish RSLs to keep developing and to do that they will need capital.
pmusgrove123
20/1/2023
11:09
Yeah, I think I agree.
lucydesouza
20/1/2023
11:03
@Wc104 - where does the CapEx cash come from? SPVs will be empty.
spectoacc
20/1/2023
10:54
HOME Rents get cut, leases restructured, capex gets spent on the homes, management and BoD changes, huge asset write downs taken, life goes on Risk to that thesis - management/BoD - they keep digging, refuse to recognise reality, more concerned about own liability CSH Similar, perhaps their assets are better run, but they won't escape lease restructuring, and they don't look like they have the balance sheet for it, so distressed rights issue or worse
williamcooper104
20/1/2023
10:48
Couple of questions (and I genuinely don't mean these to be loaded):

1. What do you guys think will happen to Home?
2. Do you think the outcome will impact CSH?

lucydesouza
19/1/2023
15:10
Yep. Seem like nice guys, huh!?
lucydesouza
19/1/2023
13:26
Just googled Topland

Just look at the legal case they were in!

They say on their website they are in social housing in the uk and Ireland

hybrasil
19/1/2023
13:24
Yes. Topland flipped a lot of properties into CSH. They also loaned money to First Priority, which leased the properties back from CSH. First Priority ran into problems. That's all a few years ago now - I'm simply using them as an example of wealthy, controversial offshore investors who have profited handsomely from all this.
lucydesouza
19/1/2023
12:35
Topland group is that who you are referring to LucyDeSouza who own hallmark hotels and many other properties.
wskill
19/1/2023
10:51
William

I think its even worse than that

hybrasil
18/1/2023
16:54
And push out the valuation yields to something more like a HMO That way you show to government that there's not excessive profits But to do that you have to admit that current shareholders have been totally mugged
williamcooper104
18/1/2023
16:52
Yep Far better sensible private sector led reforms are put in place with key stake holders - eg agreeing sensible rental levels, rent terms (actually given SPV/charity covenants it's actually in the landlords interest to have shorter not longer leases) Lest labour government comes in in a few years and just imposes something very onerous
williamcooper104
18/1/2023
16:47
The sector needs reform. It's swimming with scum bags. The regulator needs bolstered and given proper powers. Not going to happen in this parliament, but maybe the bond holders will get worried and do something if the bad press continues.
lucydesouza
18/1/2023
16:38
That's the critical thing A full kitchen sink and management changes and might be tempted But brazening it out and it's a sell The last RNS attempting to blame rent collection problems on short sellers suggests the latter alas Hopefully some major shareholding's can batter the BoD
williamcooper104
18/1/2023
16:05
Depends what you mean by historic. The Herleva and CPI Care transactions were in the year to March '22. In other words, they were some of the most recent acquisitions made by CSH.
lucydesouza
18/1/2023
15:16
@Wc - good point, any more levered and they'd definitely be toast. Feels 50:50 from here, and intrigued to know if BDO/KF/the board will kitchen sink it, or if they'll genuinely keep trying to brazen it out. Either looks terminal for management.
spectoacc
18/1/2023
15:14
HOME, in a competitive market, seems to be winning on worst, most obviously incompetent, management But their balance sheet is worth something; the short report got the timing right in that it was just before results, but wrong in that it was also shortly after HOME had raised equity rather than after it had spent and levered it
williamcooper104
Chat Pages: 1292  1291  1290  1289  1288  1287  1286  1285  1284  1283  1282  1281  Older

Your Recent History

Delayed Upgrade Clock