Cic Gold Grp Share Discussion Threads

[lithological heterogeneities] 04/4/2018 16:41

Share a taxi ?

[papillon] 03/4/2018 20:46

macnai
Posts: 110
Observation
Opinion: No Opinion
Price: 0.00
Mongolia Mining 2018 Today 14:56 Mongolia Mining 2018 International Mining & Oil Expo will be held for the 8th consecutive year on 4-6 April 2018 at Buyant Ukhaa Sports Palace, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia.


>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Anyone going? LOL. LOL.

[papillon] 01/4/2018 21:59

dougiem36
Posts: 1,746
Off Topic
Opinion: No Opinion
Price: 0.00
CIC Fuels Today 19:02 This should be good for CIC Fuels


>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

"This should be good for CIC Fuels". WRONG! It will NOT. Why? Firstly CIC Fuels heavy oil/water emulsion fuel (if it still exists!) was being aimed at mineside generators, NOT as a fuel for shipping. Secondly have a look at the QFI share price since the worlds largest container shipping line, Maersk, ended it's trials with QFI. QFI's heavy oil/water emulsion was targetting shipping. As far as CIC Fuels goes this article is of no interest.

PS. CIC Fuels originally stated their product was an heavy oil/water emulsion, then they stated it wasn't! QFI's product is a stable water in oil emulsion that uses AzkoNobel emulsifying agents to achieve a stable emulsion. It is made in a large purpose built plant onshore and then taken on board the ship. It is NOT manufactured onboard the ship. Compare this with CIC Fuels supposed product. It is manufactured in machinery sited adjacent to where it is being used because it doesn't use stable emulsifying agents (like QFI) so it has an extremely short "shelf life". That might be okay for a mineside operation and maybe a small boat, but for a large super tanker, or container ship, the fuel manufacturing machinery would have to be situated on the tanker, or container ship and would take up such a large amount of space it would reduce the cargo capacity! Just not on!

[enfranglais] 31/3/2018 13:41

Perhaps being "stewpid`s" (followers of Stewpid), they have all given up using a brain & like Stewpid himself, have no education & therefore think nothing of desecrating the English language!!!!!!!!!!

[papillon] 31/3/2018 12:02

unvrkw
Posts: 6,630
Observation
Opinion: No Opinion
Price: 0.00
RE: Mr Average Today 10:44 I don't think we will ever know why it's taken so long, based on it actually coming together! Certainly not a low risk investment if you needed your cash.
I invested why about 37 so they should have placed a note that no wonder over 55 should invested based on dieting before it comes to pass.

It's as with many off the radar as you can't trade, is the risk, wait worth while we will see. If I got 200% back after ten years I'd be happy, no problem. It's either a ball of nothing or so good, so big and probably dodgy it takes this long??

Not sure we will ever know.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

"I invested why about 37 so they should have placed a note that no wonder over 55 should invested based on dieting before it comes to pass."

Does anyone know what language this poster is using? If they do perhaps they could translate it for those ignorant of the language. :-)

[papillon] 29/3/2018 13:45

bottomsup
Posts: 1,014
Off Topic
Opinion: No Opinion
Price: 0.00
Mr Average Today 12:37 Sense doesn£t have my details.

Seems as if everything is starting to come to fruition although 5 years later than expected.
As SS said just sit back and wait for the dividends to come in each year.
Let£s hope he can lists the mining companies.
It will be interesting to see if the auction house is still going to Ipo as no payment were in the accounts for both companies announce last year!!

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

LOL. LOL. Dream on Walter Mitty. Don't you worry about the historical facts (the very poor CICR & CICC share price performance since it first listed in 2005), bottomsup, you just continue to FANTASISE like always. How's BNN these days, by the way?

[papillon] 28/3/2018 23:10

bottomsup
Posts: 1,013
Off Topic
Opinion: No Opinion
Price: 0.00
Mr average Today 22:33 Was it you good self who attended the lunch with Stuart in London several years ago or was it Sense.
It only feels like yesterday SS was telling me about it.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

It was a breakfast meeting, bottomsup, at a flash London hotel. sense was evidently prsent as was elderly groupie, share_shark. It was around 4.5 years ago, in the autumn of 2013.

[papillon] 28/3/2018 22:37

A little puzzle for you to solve, enfranglais. Having read the latest posts on the lse CICC bb could you please list the following in order of gullibility: macnai, robdance57, Candybelle & bottomsup (GENISES). Only I'm having trouble putting them in any sort of order. All four are first class Walter Mitty fantasists. I think they should donate their brains to medical science; it would help researchers in the future to determine why some folks are so gullible!

They keep regurgitating old updates that lost all credibility years ago. Fantasy CV's and fantasy assets. Why doesn't robdance ask himself why, if the CV is accurate, CICC has been delisted for almost 4 years and CICG for 2.5 years? Why doesn't bottomsup ask himself why, if the assets listed are correct, CIC Gold listed as a cash shell and couldn't organise an RTO in the required time, leading to it being delisted? Why also was it stated by the company that CIC Fuels would also list as a cash shell, if it possessed such wonderful fuel technology?

[enfranglais] 28/3/2018 20:48

Interesting that the "stewpid`s" on the LSE `bored` are looking at Stewpid`s CV & previous RNS`s/website announcements!!!
Various people, including Canadian Reporters (now working for Bloomberg), have investigated his CV & found it to be both lacking in verifiable details & just plain LIES!!! We all know that a Stewpid RNS is only useful as a lesson in how not to write in English - interestingly Barsofgold`s English is either better or he takes the precaution of using a spell checker or a 10 year old child (the competence of whom, would put Stewpid to shame)!!!!!!!
As to the DRC permits - been there, done that, they are a load of bo££ocks, as is the fuel (all part of the link to the Japanese Con)!!!!!!!

[papillon] 27/3/2018 22:22

Yes, ih_158036, but that RNS was dated 31st July 2015. Now almost 3 years later and where is the divestment news promised in the "NEAR FUTURE", or doesn't sometime during almost 3 years mean the "near future"? Perhaps the near "future means" anything up to 5 years time in CICC's opinion? Or perhaps it means up to 10 years? To my mind in the "near future" means less than a year!

It's kicking the can down the road again, something that has happened all the time since when CICR/CICC first listed in Canada back in 2005.

PS. I would have thought that these gold mining/exploration assets would have been divested into CIC Gold when it listed on 23rd June 2015, but instead it listed as a "cash shell". Why?

[enfranglais] 27/3/2018 19:22

Further announcement will also be made in the near future on the divestments.

And where are those announcements & any income from them?

As "Stewpid" has private or offshore Companies in the same fields, why would he (as an ill gotten multi millionaire) not do the deal with his "bestie" Barsofgold & profit from the "greenfield" site in Mongolia? Perhaps those "sophisticated investors" who are lining up to give Stewpid money, will feel a bit like the Mongolian people & Australian Boy Scouts - Royally Rogered?!!!!!!!

[ih_158036] 27/3/2018 18:38

RNS from July 2015



"The Company's holds a number or mineral and energy assets rights by which it will divest these assets to various vendors whom are client companies in the near future. Further announcement will also be made in the near future on the divestments. This includes Jin Ce one of China's leading potential gold mineral assets located near Asia's leading producing gold mine owned by Eldorado Gold".

[enfranglais] 27/3/2018 18:14

Stewpid has always been into "smoke & mirrors", though with his weight problems & balding pate, he probably avoids the latter at home, unless clouded by the former!!! lol
What about the DRC mining permits, one of which was not even in the name given & were only exploration permits in the end - then we never heard of them again - did they go up in smoke like the payments from Canada & Japan?!! Doh!!!!!!!!!

[papillon] 27/3/2018 16:49

macnai
Posts: 107
Off Topic
Opinion: No Opinion
Price: 0.00
Re: Jin Ce Today 15:41 Geologist Report on Jin Ce
hxxp://www.cicgold.com/pdf/GUIZHOU%20JIN%20CE%20MINING%20CO_Report_V2.0.pdf

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

That link dates from December 2009. Again after a cursory perusal there is NO MENTION of CICC involvement!

Talk about clutching at straws!

[papillon] 27/3/2018 16:43

macnai
Posts: 107
Observation
Opinion: No Opinion
Price: 0.00
Jin Ce Today 15:34 Went looking for the Jin Ce gold property and I found this.....
hxxp://www.cicgold.com/pdf/Jin%20Ce%20Gold.pdf

95% owned by Perfect Ally a Cayman Island Co
Struart Bromley contact details at bottom of the page.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

macnai is still a true believer! Whare does it state that CICC, or CICG, have a stake in the Jin Ce exploration lease? NOWHERE! Sounds like it's 95% owned by a private company, Perfect Ally, controlled by Stuart Bromley. The link is undated so the lease could have already been sold by Perfect Ally for all we know.

[enfranglais] 27/3/2018 16:31

Even the "Stewpids" get it in the end, though years after the rest of us.
Never trust a crooked second hand car salesman - well, that`s what Stewie comes across as, whenever i have spoken to him!!!!!!!!!!

[papillon] 27/3/2018 13:58

An interesting sequence of posts on the lse CICC bb. Is the truth finally dawning on the shareholders locked into CICC for almost 4 years and CICG for around 2.5 years? After all the CICR share price performed very poorly whilst listed in Canada and then the CICR/CICC share price performed poorly whilst listed on AIM. Promised deals never materialised. The company was invariably short of cash. In fact the RNS dated 2/1/2014 showed that the company had just £36k of cash remaining and consequently had to enter into a "death spiral" financing facility with "Yorkville". The sale of stakes in CIC Gold and CIC Fuels, promised back in an RNS dated 21/5/2012 were never completed and CICC never received the promised injection of cash from these sales. All the promised deals over the years invariably never materialise and just turn out to be fantasies. CIC Gold, for example, ultimately listed on the LSE as a shell company despite CICR updates & RNS's, whilst listed in Canada & on AIM, detailing investments in gold mines and gold explorers.







macnai
Posts: 105
Off Topic
Opinion: No Opinion
Price: 0.00
RE: Chinese Gold Mine Thu 15:44 Stuart needs to concentrate on what he is good at.
He needs to get out this spring into the Mongolian desert and find us a Gold Mine.

sage
Posts: 57,791
Off Topic
Opinion: No Opinion
Price: 0.00
macnai Mon 17:12 what Stuart is good at is under debate.. :)

bottomsup
Posts: 1,008
Off Topic
Opinion: No Opinion
Price: 0.00
Communication Today 06:27 Lacks skills in communicating to its shareholders,specially on reply to emails.
Fabrication of deals that never materialise.
Expectations rarely achieved with deals at least 5 years away from fruition.

[the diddymen] 23/3/2018 19:32

Paps, Share Shark was not doing it for benevolence. There are many people who have been ruined by the likes of Share Shark and The Ven. (As the author of the sobriquet "the Ven" I always thought it nicely described her Venerable 'demeanor' with the venom of a fork tongued snake. Neither were pleasant characters.

TD

[papillon] 22/3/2018 13:21

The link I posted is for the accounts for the 3 year period ended 31st January 2018.

So accounts for years ending 31/1/2016, 31/1/2017, 31/1/2018.

That does leave the accounts for the years ending 31/1/2014 and 31/1//2015 are still not accessible, TD

[goulding1215] 22/3/2018 12:25

If you read the accounts accurately papillon, you always look at worst case scenario, you will see added values from the prospective listings and CICGold when it resists.

[the diddymen] 22/3/2018 10:05

Paps

I have seen the posting of the accounts, but the last accounts issued were the 2013/14 half years. This leaves a gap (which probably have been filed in Canada, but not circulated to shareholders.

It may be the Easter w/e before I have a chance to look!

TD

[papillon] 21/3/2018 23:20

CIC Capital Fund had 412,282,092 shares in issue. After a 10:1 consolidation it has 41,228,209 shares in issue. It has Net Current Assets (Total Current Assets - Total Current Liabilities) of just £1,814,367.

If this is to float successfully in Luxembourg there is going to have to be an awful lot of hope built into the share price on listing because if the share price just reflected the Net Current Assets on listing it would be equivalent to around 4.5p and be disaster for existing investors bearing in mind the original investors have had the number of shares they own in CIC Capital Fund reduced by a factor of 10. In other words it would be equivalent to around just 0.45p per share based on the pre consolidation shares in issue.