We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cloudified Holdings Limited | LSE:CHL | London | Ordinary Share | VGG3338A1158 | ORD NPV (DI) |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.00 | 0.00% | 6.00 | 5.00 | 7.00 | 6.00 | 5.425 | 6.00 | 14,170 | 08:00:07 |
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Business Services, Nec | 4.57M | 1.49M | 0.2821 | 0.74 | 1.09M |
Date | Subject | Author | Discuss |
---|---|---|---|
22/8/2016 21:02 | Well probably because the stock is quasi-suspended until further news comes forth.Directors can't take a salary when theres nothing to do and in the hands of the litigators.They simply take share options in lieu of a salary, whatever the outcome. | wulber | |
22/8/2016 18:22 | Dont think they would have done that if they thought there was a remote chance they could end up with next to nothing ? | debbiegee | |
22/8/2016 18:04 | DQ is key - he should know better than anyone what is and has been going on. Therefore, why would he and (other directors) forego a justifiable salary for several years if he did not believe Churchill would win? | baxter99 | |
22/8/2016 17:55 | On that point, Indonesia made a statement in june 2015, saying chl was not being accused of fraud by ROI. then ROI brought the forgery charge against chl. It is my understanding that forgery is fraud, how on earth have ROI managed to clear chl of fraud yet then accused chl of forgery, Not unlike Alice in wonderland, curiouser and curiouser. | stephen1946 | |
22/8/2016 17:42 | May/jun/july 2015 the MM's must have taken a bath, the price went to 50p and the selling must have caught them cold, obviously mm's got left with plenty at top price, therefore no chances being taken this time around. | stephen1946 | |
22/8/2016 16:53 | September next week..... Tick Tock and all that. Within 5 weeks at most (and sooner unless less ICSID wait until the last minute) we should have the ICSID judgement on document authenticity. Should be a good read. Unless you are Isran Noor. ;-) FC | flyingc | |
22/8/2016 16:37 | Roi have twisted, lied, undermined the tribunal at every corner. After the forgery results we will have good feeling which way this one will definitely pan out. | neo26 | |
22/8/2016 16:32 | Another option available to chl is Estoppel, chl invested in good faith, no one knew about this world class reserve when chl purchased license. It was only when chl invested and found it everyone in roi started having fetishes. But I believe chl will "walk the authenticity phase". Chl licenses are logged in the east kutai registry. The issue are those ridlatama licenses (early ones). All will be a lot clearer, shortly. Must say DQ credibility will be on the line, but I think we will be alright. But we all have to remember if roi had strong case why default on the payment due? Why not force Mr Noor to attend? This is not the sort of behaviour from a defendant who has strong case. | neo26 | |
22/8/2016 16:31 | Pragmatist | tburns | |
22/8/2016 14:46 | Ross, so basically you are pessimistic regarding the claim, an optimistic pessimist? | stephen1946 | |
22/8/2016 13:13 | T traders will be calculating the days and exposure. No T traders today and have only noticed a small proportion in last few trading sessions. Would expect to see a much larger proportion by early next week unless we have a sudden change before then. | debbiegee | |
22/8/2016 13:06 | We have bank holiday coming, 8 trading days after today. Can start to move anytime now. | neo26 | |
22/8/2016 13:00 | Many juggling till the last minute ,Me thinks ! | debbiegee | |
22/8/2016 12:37 | Until I'm back in | cool hand kev | |
22/8/2016 12:36 | Just how long can the mm's keep this down? | stephen1946 | |
22/8/2016 11:13 | So its Dismissed or not Perhaps some details highlighted for going forward ? | debbiegee | |
22/8/2016 11:09 | deb ICSID have to make a decision, application is dismissed or not, very simple. Worse case, CHL will still have a case even with some shady business in the past by ridlatama, and i am confident they will get more than current mkt cap. Prabowo, Noor and his cronies are shivering in their boots. | neo26 | |
22/8/2016 11:05 | I think theoretically the result of the forgery dismissal could be black white or any shade of grey inbetween. Most of us I think expect a win but who knows there could be a little touch of grey to go with it ? | debbiegee | |
22/8/2016 10:57 | Sorry Debbie, I meant the forgery claim | tburns | |
22/8/2016 10:57 | trade 11,12 and 13 are buys. Guaranteed. :) | neo26 | |
22/8/2016 10:46 | We won the jusisdiction years ago,end of ! | debbiegee | |
22/8/2016 10:41 | Will the jurisdiction point be a straight yay or nay or can it come with possible caveats does anyone think? Just summising | tburns |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions