ADVFN Logo ADVFN

We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.

Trending Now

Toplists

It looks like you aren't logged in.
Click the button below to log in and view your recent history.

Hot Features

Registration Strip Icon for discussion Register to chat with like-minded investors on our interactive forums.

CLLN Carillion Plc

14.20
0.00 (0.00%)
17 May 2024 - Closed
Delayed by 15 minutes
Share Name Share Symbol Market Type Share ISIN Share Description
Carillion Plc LSE:CLLN London Ordinary Share GB0007365546 ORD 50P
  Price Change % Change Share Price Bid Price Offer Price High Price Low Price Open Price Shares Traded Last Trade
  0.00 0.00% 14.20 - 0.00 01:00:00
Industry Sector Turnover Profit EPS - Basic PE Ratio Market Cap
0 0 N/A 0

Carillion Share Discussion Threads

Showing 10726 to 10749 of 12450 messages
Chat Pages: Latest  438  437  436  435  434  433  432  431  430  429  428  427  Older
DateSubjectAuthorDiscuss
27/11/2017
10:20
Due a big recovery biw
kirk 6
27/11/2017
09:01
Not wasting my time excell, I find this scenario interesting. And if I stop 1 person (as stated when this was £1.80 too) buying this rubbish that is a bonus.
wallywoo
27/11/2017
08:19
Keep posting wally and wasting your time. Like I am wasting mine lol.
Will not make a deal of difference if no one posted on here.

excell1
27/11/2017
08:16
excel, lol. I remember you posting the exact same post when this was 55p. And you are posting that people who are short are dishonest!!

It is not our fault that this company is a dogs dinner. The only reason this won't have a rights issue is because the current share price means it can't raise enough cash to solve any problems. Money flowing out, unable to sell the assets they intended. It looks very much like administration coming to me.

wallywoo
26/11/2017
23:18
I suspect that the company may go bust before the new CEO comes on board. The accounts of the previous years could not have been correct if there are massive write offs this year. Write offs and provisions are made as and when considered necessary after careful and regular reviews. The earlier years' accounts may well have been overstating profit massively, with profits from new contracts covering the loss making ones and stringing it out from year to year, presenting a falsely profitable business.

All is revealed when the music stops because not only is there no cash there are few or no profitable new contracts covering sufficiently the losses of the existing ones, hence the chicken has come home to roost.

Assessing and taking attributable profit from a long term contract is one of the most important work that a technically competent accountant has to deal with, and by adopting a prudent approach.


It is possible that further nasty things have not yet been uncovered. Such events would accelerate the rate of destruction. Government cannot put pressure on banks and other lenders to be lenient on the company. Witness the financial scandal and near collapse of Lloyds Bank taking over HBOS.

Meanwhile many suppliers are unhappy with the new payment terms. They must be all feeling nervous. New customers will think twice giving business to the company. It is suffering from all fronts. If an investigation by a regulatory authority were to take place on potential irregularities it will be the last straw.

kingston78
26/11/2017
22:13
I hope for for your own sake dealy you are right. I'm still holding my position but not loosing any sleep as I knew this is a big gamble. If it gets to 50p in 3 months I will buy you a drink down the local Wetherspoons during happy hour and we can have a good laugh with Sheila the slag.
balbains324
26/11/2017
21:16
Sparky, even if you are right...the shareholders of the banks didn't do great out of that one.
pyueck
26/11/2017
20:43
The banks have to be very careful if it was not for the government the whole UK financial markets would have collapsed.With CLLN so embedded in U.K. Government project I expect some serious pressure will be applied to the lenders.
sparky333
26/11/2017
19:58
With so many negative posts here,why do those that are short or work for those that are short post so frequently ? If you are so convinced that the company is
broken then why waste your valuable time trying to persuade others.Let the company go to the wall on it's own. Perhaps though you are not as convinced as your arguments suggest. It would appear that the banks are willing to extend the time until April next year when the new CEO takes over and covenants will not be broken in 2017.

excell1
26/11/2017
19:43
Dealy so are you expecting there not to be a fundraise and just an extension of the debt facility and waver of covenants! Do you really think that ? Would like it to be so with a risky long punt now.
kirk 6
26/11/2017
18:58
Last 2 posts have not provided counter arguments to my points. Just re-iterating baseless hysteria
dealy
26/11/2017
17:53
It's quite interesting reading some of the posts above. There appears to be a massive sense of denial on those that still own shares in this company. It's obvious that the company is in dire straights. I think their likely demise could be the major news story between Christmas and New Year given the collateral damage in the public sector.
topvest
26/11/2017
17:24
It's bust.

1p target.

sux_2bu
26/11/2017
17:24
If you are such a believer in book value than short amazon which trades at 24 times book value.Another metric worth considering is Ev/ebitda. Ev here (net debt plus market cap) is currently about 1 billion and steady state Ebitda is about 300m. That gives a value of 3.3. Companies regularly sell for 6 times ebitda in mature industries
dealy
26/11/2017
17:12
The reported net assets of 729m at the end of 2016 and then took 1.2 billion in charges to arrive at negative net assets. That was not a cash charge. Going forward the company should be able to generate 200m per year in profits (no taxes). Those future profits have a value (at least 1 billion pounds ) and are not on the balance sheet. So be careful focusing on book value alone. Value is future profits
dealy
26/11/2017
16:43
Dealy even with your blinkers you can see that Clln are very much like Jarvis and tullow are not.
Save me looking up Tullow did they have NEGATIVE £400m assets prior to a rights issue?


Come clean how much are you down ? 70%?

fenners66
26/11/2017
14:12
No just for info and not really bullish just expecting a dead cat bounce to mid 20s. Should be next week
kirk 6
26/11/2017
13:26
@ kirk6 - You appear to be bullish of this share. In which case you do realise that article you posted is bearish don't you? Unless you're just posting it for info, in which case good show for posting an article that's contrary to your position.
calahan
26/11/2017
13:22
He recommends buying ncc at 30 times earnings after it has alreafy had a huge recovery. Lemming
dealy
26/11/2017
13:08
Either way nothing goes down in a straight line so expect a bounce Monday
kirk 6
26/11/2017
13:08
And these guys are never wrong , right?
dealy
26/11/2017
13:06
Lets repeat the target.



Broker Liberum certainly thinks so. 'Sell' it screams, slapping a price target of just 5p on the shares. UBS goes further, given a significant deterioration in cash collection.

"Our valuation was already in slight negative equity value today and with higher debt and lower earnings this would widen," it says. "We set our price target at 1p".

sux_2bu
26/11/2017
13:05
Broker Liberum certainly thinks so. 'Sell' it screams, slapping a price target of just 5p on the shares. UBS goes further, given a significant deterioration in cash collection.

"Our valuation was already in slight negative equity value today and with higher debt and lower earnings this would widen," it says. "We set our price target at 1p".

sux_2bu
26/11/2017
13:04
1p is the target of hedge funds
sux_2bu
Chat Pages: Latest  438  437  436  435  434  433  432  431  430  429  428  427  Older