Brandshield Systems Share Discussion Threads

[kaos3] 10/1/2021 13:06

I do not claim to understand but

BRDS is growing fast, getting good clients, making good cash and has to run very fast to be the world leader by signed contracts ..... or else competitors will thrive and eventually beat BRSD it it looses
30 man is not enough . diluting them is not ok imho

why bother with "potential"

[aidenabettin] 10/1/2021 12:53

You obviously dont understand the Weshop concept.Do some research on Tencent.Brandshield providing protection against counterfeit goods,crypto payments and social media.Brandshield and Weshop will become one imo

[aidenabettin] 10/1/2021 12:36

I have no ego. I am an investor and these bb's are for members to give their opinions and not for the use of some city mafia to influence the decisions of others regarding investment by spreading fear and uncertainty. I post as i see it and a thumbs up/thumbs down facility is available for you to use to show you agree or disagree. When you talk about corruption and market manipulation/money laundering it is always going to draw attacks from those gaining the most from those practises. I just say it as i see it

[echoridge] 10/1/2021 12:28

I know you want it to be, but it isn't. As I said, most of it is a means for you to try and pump up your ego which, while probably harmless, is still pretty annoying. But when you mix it with shocking ignorance about how brokers operate or how an RTO actually works, it can bend back towards the dangerous.

[aidenabettin] 10/1/2021 12:18

Well dont comment if you dont know the full history as its 100% relevant here.Time you did some research

[echoridge] 10/1/2021 11:53

I could care less about your particular mix of 'fact' and speculation. All I care about is raising the conversation on this board to feature relevant, value-creating information (like the price discovery imputed in the RTO) and sometimes correct misperceptions or outright nonsense that private shareholders like yourself seem to cling to like what you think firms like Spreadex can or do get involved in (again: they are a broker that provides leverage to clients through spread bet style products. P.E.R.I.O.D. They don't 'show up' to 'manage share prices' or 'clean up messes'. That is all pure fantasy). One (very) common problem I find with guys like you is that you seem to think that your 'length of service', as it were, on some poxy company message board like this one, affords you a kind of status that someone like me needs to heed somehow, simply because you've been around for a while (or of course, the first derivative of that where guys like you love to rattle off historical tidbits from 'back in the day' as a way of basically showing off). No, I wasn't 'here' for the 'Matthew West mess' and you know what? I don't give a hoot about it. And you know why? Because it doesn't matter a lick. What does matter is that shareholders in TSI now own an operating Software as a Service business that is completely focused on what looks like an industry-leading, core competency in a space that is exploding in relevance with a business model that generates 80%+ gross margins and, I guess unfortunately for you, that is pretty much all that matters now and for the immediate future.

[aidenabettin] 10/1/2021 11:32

KKME. hTTps://www.kalaharikey.co.uk/key-staff/.Were you here when Chris Ells was being attacked by the usual gang because a new plan had been hatched. Makes me think of how James Draper is being treated at Bidstack.More connections at KKME than BT

[aidenabettin] 10/1/2021 11:26

Were you here for the Matthew West mess?.Thats when spreadex entered the scene to clean it up. Kodal being pumped but not the TSI assets next door. Everything in Botswana is a winner but not according to the TSI valuation. Possibly one of the largest ever Cobalt discoveries outside of DRC in Cameroon and TSI value it at $150k.Some of what i post is fact and some speculation but at the end of the day they are just 'PERSONAL' opinions as are my opinions to buy,sell or hold.No financial advice is intended DYOR

[echoridge] 10/1/2021 11:13

Look, there's no real harm in your continuing to yammer on about legacy assets (though I will say again, that there is real harm potentially about your continuing to insist on utterly phoney ideas like Spreadex is absolutely anything other than a broker facilitating client trades and instead 'shows up' to try and manage the share price. Yikes...),and I guess reminding shareholders that they exist at all is in some way a service. However, keeping to the quaint notion that what we know to be true should always supersede what we may think is so or, clearly in your case, what we really really really WANT to be true, we KNOW that the RTO/cap raise were done at a TSI price that semi-severely valued TSIs other holdings outside its stake in Brandshield. Therefore, QED, John Taylor and the rest of TSI management accepted, as the price of getting Brandshield - where they had far from a controlling stake - to agree to reverse into TSI and become a listed company, was the downgrading of the value of everything else they owned, most particularly Weshop. Now that does not mean that those assets can't be re-valued in the future, and you are right to hope for that, but it does mean, for now and for the immediate future that matters, we can state with confidence where new management's focus is and will be.

[aidenabettin] 10/1/2021 10:54

But we do have ex BNR/TSI men employed at KKME which may just turn out to be a massive discovery which TSI valued a $175k. Massive lithium and Cobalt discoveries almost written off. IGS Global discovery work and now a contract in Saudi with the Chinese as partners valued by TSI(30% holding) as zero.You dont write all that off without something coming back the other way.For me whats coming back is massive chinese investment through Weshop Singapore and all being protected by Brandshield

[echoridge] 10/1/2021 10:39

Yoav joined the board of Weshop because his biggest shareholder at the time asked him to, though the enthusiasm for synergies were clearly on the TSI side at the time. He now runs the combined, listed entity, and the original TSI executives have swapped any control in the running of the company for the hope of significant capital gains. In fact, the only remains of TSI anywhere in the extended management ranks is John Taylor who is a non-exec board member, while the rest of our small board is constituted by Brandshield technologists, led by our non-exec Chairman. And it is clear that Yoav's focus right now and into the future, is on the legacy Brandshield business, period. That isn't to say that Weshop will not continue to get some resources from the company, but the likelihood of its value growing sufficiently over say, the next 5 years, to figure in any such deal you're suggesting, is fanciful. For now, it is, as options traders like to say, a 'free call'.

[echoridge] 10/1/2021 10:17

A prediction that many already knew was coming (though they didn't happen to post about it) certainly does not improve your self-declared status as a prognosticator one jot, and even more certainly doesn't make any other statements you might make any less ridiculous. Spreadex are not 'here' for any reason other than the one I mentioned and the reason you mentioned - 'to control the price' - is profoundly ignorant. As to your main point, the new Brandshield is now a near-£30m company versus a denuded, imputed value for Weshop as I've explained. There is simply no mathematical basis for another 'RTO' or other related transaction involving Weshop, now or into the foreseeable future. As I hinted, the effective downgrade of the implied value for Weshop in the RTO was not a major focus for the market, but I imagine if he is a significant shareholder in Weshop, it's a pretty good theory why Lenigas might be a bit PO'd/disoriented at the moment.

[aidenabettin] 10/1/2021 10:03

I have no interest in David Lenigas other than that he is part of the colonial machine with a focus on natural resources. The natural resources built up by BNR and subsequently written down by TSI is all part of the swap deal. Was this the right time for Yoav to be joining the board of Weshop if its just a sideshow? Doesnt he have enough to be getting on with at Brandshield ?.More M&A activity on the way before end of Q1 imo. Spreadex have had it easy since the RTO so lets see what happens if we get an increase in buying.BRSD is a 100% no brainer imo

[aidenabettin] 10/1/2021 09:57

Well what i do know is that i was the only one claiming Brandshield would RTO with TSI and not do a stand alone IPO that was being promoted .Happy to be in the minority of 1 and will stick with my belief that Brandshield will merge /RTOwith Weshop.Spreadex are here to control the shareprice movements imo.Time will tell

[echoridge] 10/1/2021 09:55

And as I anticipate this 'argument' is going to continue, let me add that sighting Lenigas's name in order to try and bolster yours is not a great start. He is radioactive among sophisticated investors and institutions.

[aidenabettin] 10/1/2021 09:25

Have you looked at the Weshop shareholder list?.David Lenigas(when he was a shareholder of TSI/BNR) said the deal(Asset swap) is extremely complicated and i dont doubt it.That deal wasn't just for the Brandshield RTO.Why do you think Spreadex are here?.Lets see what the CEO has to say pre AGM. For me its a 100% merger/RTO between Brandshield and Weshop

[echoridge] 10/1/2021 09:09

Aiden - I'm afraid you're suffering a bit from Legacy Shareholder Syndrome. I appreciate the old TwoShields made a lot of noise about their investment in Weshop and the subsequent JV with Brandshield at the time, but the acceleration in demand for Brandshield's core product- as Yoav articulates well in the share-talk interview - in the Covid economy is, and will continue to be for the near-to-medium term in my view, occupying the lion's share of management mind-space and strategic direction. For good or ill, the value creation in this share for the foreseeable will be coming through the original Brandshield product suite, and not Weshop, and that's where investor's attention should remain laser-focused in my view. In addition, I'm not sure what you're referring to as a 'swap coming our way is investment through Weshop....', etc.

[aidenabettin] 09/1/2021 09:45

Getting it all done early as well(AGM).Sets it up nicely for the Weshop investment before end of Feb.We have swapped quite substantial assets in lithium,Cobalt,PGM's and REM's.The swap coming our way is investment through Weshop.The combination of Brandshield and Weshop may just become one of the stars of 2021.Long BRSD

[tommyknockers1] 09/1/2021 09:38

Yoav is calm and collected in delivering a solid message as to why Brandshield is ahead of the game.

Great interview.

Now onto the 2020 numbers and key will be the forecast for 2021.

[aidenabettin] 08/1/2021 17:12

hTTps://www.scamadviser.com/scam-reports/news-about-scamadviser/4011/scamfighter-of-the-year-2020

[aidenabettin] 08/1/2021 14:44

'Our technology is way ahead of the competitors'.#BUY

[the chairman elect] 08/1/2021 14:42

Canadian listed BITCOIN MINER & BLOCKCHAIN [MKT CAP sub £10m] which is up YET again - now over CAD$1.50 and absolutely flying as with many BITCOIN MINERS = namely TSXV:BITK