Share Name Share Symbol Market Type Share ISIN Share Description
Brandshield Systems Plc LSE:BRSD London Ordinary Share GB00BM97CN29 ORD 1P
  Price Change % Change Share Price Shares Traded Last Trade
  0.00 0.0% 8.75 18,250 08:00:09
Bid Price Offer Price High Price Low Price Open Price
8.50 9.00 8.75 8.52 8.75
Industry Sector Turnover (m) Profit (m) EPS - Basic PE Ratio Market Cap (m)
General Financial 2.59 -3.30 -0.08 12
Last Trade Time Trade Type Trade Size Trade Price Currency
10:25:28 O 4,514 8.50 GBX

Brandshield Systems (BRSD) Latest News

More Brandshield Systems News
Brandshield Systems Investors    Brandshield Systems Takeover Rumours

Brandshield Systems (BRSD) Discussions and Chat

Brandshield Systems Forums and Chat

Date Time Title Posts
18/6/202209:32BRSD Brandshield - formerly TSI (Two Shields)1,352

Add a New Thread

Brandshield Systems (BRSD) Most Recent Trades

No Trades
Trade Time Trade Price Trade Size Trade Value Trade Type
View all Brandshield Systems trades in real-time

Brandshield Systems (BRSD) Top Chat Posts

Brandshield Systems Daily Update: Brandshield Systems Plc is listed in the General Financial sector of the London Stock Exchange with ticker BRSD. The last closing price for Brandshield Systems was 8.75p.
Brandshield Systems Plc has a 4 week average price of 8.25p and a 12 week average price of 8.25p.
The 1 year high share price is 20.50p while the 1 year low share price is currently 8.25p.
There are currently 141,165,207 shares in issue and the average daily traded volume is 25,568 shares. The market capitalisation of Brandshield Systems Plc is £12,351,955.61.
pegasus59: hTTps:// BrandShield Systems plc (AIM: BRSD), a leading provider of cybersecurity solutions from brand protection to online threat hunting, in fast-growing markets including cybersecurity, e-commerce and technology-enabled businesses, announces it has entered into an agreement with Leumi Bank to provide a revolving MRR (Monthly Recurring Revenue) credit line facility of up to 8 million NIS (c. $2.5 million) (the New Debt Facility).
aidenabettin: Been away so long I had forgot about the PR dealBrandShield Taps Silicon Valley Firm VSC as Agency of Record for Global PR and Communications hTTps://
aidenabettin: Dilution after share issueNo selling has been done with this stockShare price movement has been down to spreadex alone
echoridge: Brandshield's business has not developed as quickly or profitably as hoped and that, combined with a massive re-rating of tech and software companies worldwide, have crushed the share price. Incompetence maybe, over-promising and under-delivering for sure, but failure (to date) is not the equivalent of corruption, no matter how angry it all makes you. Insisting it does makes your views suspect and yes, borderline conspiracy theories
pegasus59: Because if you look at it logically Brandshield under normal circumstances would be described as being in a death spiral RTO 20p Raise 14p Raise 8p That's either a company struggling to raise cash with no confidence from the investment sector or its simply share price manipulation to give UHNWI's control of a company that if the truth were known would be valued at >$1 Same old corrupt story taking place in Broad daylight When you highlight it your a conspiracy theorist I highlighted the problem with PPE Medpro when it was announced initially and who was involved How did that conspiracy play out?
pegasus59: Total control of issued stock More unnamed contracts or other news ie USA-IT to lift the the share price or more manipulation for a 4p raise Tackling illicit trade and insider contracts with PPE Medpro in the headlines and Weshop moving to BVI It's not rocket science to work it out
pegasus59: Mates rates Look who is buying Soon will be zero free float Share price manipulation at its best.
kemche: echoridge - 13 Sep 2021 - 07:46:30 - 1076 of 1282 BRSD Brandshield - formerly TSI (Two Shields) - BRSD what does spreadex have to do with anything? answer: absolutely nothing except in your twisted, 1975 mind. Market will like the growth and the obvious path to profitability if Q4 growth is as management is suggesting and the share price should push on from here.
pretax2: If you listen to YK's interview (Feb 22nd) at 3.30 mins he suggests that high growth companies like Brandshield are often valued at 15-20x Annual Recurring Revenue (ARR). hxxps:// Current ARR = £2.36m Current Shares in issue = 117.95m Current Market cap = £26.24m gives us a share price of 22p ARR x15 = Market cap = £35.4m gives us a share price of 30p ARR x20 = Market cap = £47.2m gives us a share price of 40p But if a 50% undervaluation isn't enough; the company grew ARR by 71% last year and only recently started to aggressively market Brandshield products. Therefore future growth could be exponential. They have no intention of doing further significant fundraising apparently, so with 117m shares in issue, it won't take much buying for the shareprice to shift. Roll on forthcoming results DYOR
sphere25: Reb_Ban and Heatseek77, You have brought up an interesting topic, which I will post on for the benefit of those who appreciate my posts. Buys and sells are not invariably wrong. That would suggest that the ADVFN system is grossly flawed and market participants are not able to form reliable conclusions when looking at the trade data or indeed make trading decisions on the back of that data - rendering the subscription cost rather meaningless too. This is not the case with numerous examples of shares being posted recently whereby the deciphering of trades and the mechanics of how they influence a share price have been shown to provide fruitful opportunities (note that a firm grasp of the fundamentals is not a pre-requisite for short term traders if they can read the trade data and technicals well - hence why BRSD can also be stuck on a monitor and highlighted as an early stage viewing and potential trade at some point). All this has shown is that market participants can get reliably informed on the back of reading the ADVFN trade data, given some time and experience. Naturally, if you are long term orientated and looking e.g. 5-10 years out, it is of less relevance but I have known many longer term shareholders who have taken up short term trading in some of the shares they are involved with. Furthermore, if you are concentrating on particular shares and watching them more closely (rather than being diluted across many as per us short term trading folk), there is an argument to say that you can read the price moves, notice irregular orders on the book and get a much better feel for trading a particular share - particularly smaller caps where there is far less frenzied activity. So where can ADVFN trade data mislead on buys and sells? BRSD is a good example whereby the spread was 23-24p on Friday afternoon, but because there have been sellers in size in the market, shares were being offered well under the market offer price of 24p e.g. on there was a 3000 buy trade at 23.42p and two buy trades of 1247 and 23158 at 23.41p. This can be checked by doing a simple request for shares of around market size in a share dealing account where the dealing price on RSP will reflect the amounts quoted. ADVFN will log a trade in green if it is at the mid-point price of 23.5p. If it is above the mid-point price, it will be shown in blue as a buy, and conversely if it is below the mid-point price it will be shown in red as a sell. This is where one of the issues can arise with ADVFN when large sellers (this can also apply to fast moving shares on a brief intraday basis depending on market maker antics as per FUM on Friday where there were small time periods where buys were being logged as sells) are working in the market. These large sellers are putting downward pressure on the price and offering shares below the mid price, which means ADVFN will log them as sells. Now if enough volume comes in to clear (or begin to clear) these sellers, the whole dynamic can change and trades could then be above the mid-point price i.e. being logged in blue with possibly less pressure on the price. A big volume clear out or overhang clearance in one fair swoop can change the price dynamic drastically, and result in very few or no shares being available at even the full offer price, and the price then being bid up and moving more substantially by breaking negative or sideway trends. The only way I could see a firm review based conclusion of ADVFN trade data being invariably wrong (or even majority wrong) is if someone mainly has shares on the monitor that have these types of big sellers at work and then perhaps they are focusing more on the trades being logged as sells. If we took a basket of market maker only shares (particularly in their more dormant state outside of news where they sit without substantial movement for the majority of time periods) and observed the trade data, the ADVFN system would acknowledge the majority correctly with normal sized trades showing the correct side of the mid-point prices and being logged correctly as per the way market makers sit on bid and offer prices and how they offer shares in the market. This brings us nicely on to larger trades, though far less frequent than the smaller trades, but can be more difficult to decipher and more prone to being logged with less accuracy by ADVFN. The larger trades (sometimes a small multiple above normal market size offered by market makers or some of the larger ones we have seen in BRSD e.g. the 200k) are often delayed so when they are reported they are logged relative to the bid and offer price in the market at the point of logging the trade on ADVFN. As the price could have already moved, it can cause confusion on what the trade actually was and what it means for how a trader should react. This is something that comes with time but even more experienced folk can still struggle with. If you press "Go" on Level 2, any such trades will be realigned back to the time at which they were logged, whereby a more accurate representation of whether they were buys or sells can be seen (note that pressing "Go" post 8am will however refresh the intraday chart to only include the current day's price movement and not the previous day too - many trade off the two day charts on Level 2). If some of these trades fall right to the bottom or the price is completely out of kilter with current day prices (or even the previous day), it will be delayed and usually from a day or two before. ADVFN won't log this volume on the current date, and if it hasn't been logged on the day it happened (sometimes it can be the other side of the trade exchange or just delayed) it won't add to that day's volume either so there could be some significant volume missing on ADVFN from time to time. Corrections aren't accounted for correctly on ADVFN either so a 1.049m print being corrected with another 1.049m print (the deletion) and reapplication of the correct 1.094m will all add up on ADVFN to incorrectly skew the volume. All the shares move differently and the mechanics can vary, but when looking at BRSD, I can see the news has resulted in more interest and some buyers in size have come in to pick some larger blocks of shares up. However, seen as there are larger sellers still willing to sell in the market (the news isn't validation enough to change their perception of the valuation here) they are happy to meet that new demand for shares. The overall effect on the price is therefore minimal at presence with a slight down tick this morning as those larger aforementioned sellers work in the market, but the overall price being range bound at 20-25p. Ultimately it is a form of stalemate which could change with further bullish news or we could see further large demand come in for shares (which is part of the reason I am watching) that could cause a tipping point in the demand-supply dynamic that allows a clearing of these larger sellers holding the price back from breaking that key resistance at 25p. This is an observation based on the trade data and price mechanics currently at work here. It is one example where the principles can be applied to many others for the purposes of shorter term trading. Care still has to be taken to be vigilant as it does not guarantee the share will provide a trading opportunity, because the sellers can still rule the roost, and prices can even make new lows if large demand gets exhausted and sellers then keep working to push the price down where less resistance is offered, hence the need for stops and cutting positions and taking any small losses quickly if an error of judgement is made. Naturally there are SetsMM shares and various shares that all have different liquidity and participation which can slightly alter the way trade exchanges are logged and perceived. There is more to be said here, but it has become abit of seminar already so leave it there for now. Hope it helps All imo DYOR
Brandshield Systems share price data is direct from the London Stock Exchange
ADVFN Advertorial
Your Recent History
Register now to watch these stocks streaming on the ADVFN Monitor.

Monitor lets you view up to 110 of your favourite stocks at once and is completely free to use.

By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions

P: V: D:20220627 02:34:11