Share Name Share Symbol Market Type Share ISIN Share Description
Brandshield Systems Plc LSE:BRSD London Ordinary Share GB00BM97CN29 ORD 1P
  Price Change % Change Share Price Shares Traded Last Trade
  0.00 0.0% 21.00 181,268 01:00:00
Bid Price Offer Price High Price Low Price Open Price
20.00 22.00 21.00 21.00 21.00
Industry Sector Turnover (m) Profit (m) EPS - Basic PE Ratio Market Cap (m)
General Financial -1.96 25
Last Trade Time Trade Type Trade Size Trade Price Currency
16:36:12 O 50,000 20.25 GBX

Brandshield Systems (BRSD) Latest News

More Brandshield Systems News
Brandshield Systems Investors    Brandshield Systems Takeover Rumours

Brandshield Systems (BRSD) Discussions and Chat

Brandshield Systems Forums and Chat

Date Time Title Posts
13/4/202118:33BRSD Brandshield - formerly TSI (Two Shields)683

Add a New Thread

Brandshield Systems (BRSD) Most Recent Trades

Trade Time Trade Price Trade Size Trade Value Trade Type
View all Brandshield Systems trades in real-time

Brandshield Systems (BRSD) Top Chat Posts

Brandshield Systems Daily Update: Brandshield Systems Plc is listed in the General Financial sector of the London Stock Exchange with ticker BRSD. The last closing price for Brandshield Systems was 21p.
Brandshield Systems Plc has a 4 week average price of 19.76p and a 12 week average price of 19.76p.
The 1 year high share price is 33.74p while the 1 year low share price is currently 0.07p.
There are currently 117,950,921 shares in issue and the average daily traded volume is 524,919 shares. The market capitalisation of Brandshield Systems Plc is £24,769,693.41.
sphere25: Reb_Ban and Heatseek77, You have brought up an interesting topic, which I will post on for the benefit of those who appreciate my posts. Buys and sells are not invariably wrong. That would suggest that the ADVFN system is grossly flawed and market participants are not able to form reliable conclusions when looking at the trade data or indeed make trading decisions on the back of that data - rendering the subscription cost rather meaningless too. This is not the case with numerous examples of shares being posted recently whereby the deciphering of trades and the mechanics of how they influence a share price have been shown to provide fruitful opportunities (note that a firm grasp of the fundamentals is not a pre-requisite for short term traders if they can read the trade data and technicals well - hence why BRSD can also be stuck on a monitor and highlighted as an early stage viewing and potential trade at some point). All this has shown is that market participants can get reliably informed on the back of reading the ADVFN trade data, given some time and experience. Naturally, if you are long term orientated and looking e.g. 5-10 years out, it is of less relevance but I have known many longer term shareholders who have taken up short term trading in some of the shares they are involved with. Furthermore, if you are concentrating on particular shares and watching them more closely (rather than being diluted across many as per us short term trading folk), there is an argument to say that you can read the price moves, notice irregular orders on the book and get a much better feel for trading a particular share - particularly smaller caps where there is far less frenzied activity. So where can ADVFN trade data mislead on buys and sells? BRSD is a good example whereby the spread was 23-24p on Friday afternoon, but because there have been sellers in size in the market, shares were being offered well under the market offer price of 24p e.g. on there was a 3000 buy trade at 23.42p and two buy trades of 1247 and 23158 at 23.41p. This can be checked by doing a simple request for shares of around market size in a share dealing account where the dealing price on RSP will reflect the amounts quoted. ADVFN will log a trade in green if it is at the mid-point price of 23.5p. If it is above the mid-point price, it will be shown in blue as a buy, and conversely if it is below the mid-point price it will be shown in red as a sell. This is where one of the issues can arise with ADVFN when large sellers (this can also apply to fast moving shares on a brief intraday basis depending on market maker antics as per FUM on Friday where there were small time periods where buys were being logged as sells) are working in the market. These large sellers are putting downward pressure on the price and offering shares below the mid price, which means ADVFN will log them as sells. Now if enough volume comes in to clear (or begin to clear) these sellers, the whole dynamic can change and trades could then be above the mid-point price i.e. being logged in blue with possibly less pressure on the price. A big volume clear out or overhang clearance in one fair swoop can change the price dynamic drastically, and result in very few or no shares being available at even the full offer price, and the price then being bid up and moving more substantially by breaking negative or sideway trends. The only way I could see a firm review based conclusion of ADVFN trade data being invariably wrong (or even majority wrong) is if someone mainly has shares on the monitor that have these types of big sellers at work and then perhaps they are focusing more on the trades being logged as sells. If we took a basket of market maker only shares (particularly in their more dormant state outside of news where they sit without substantial movement for the majority of time periods) and observed the trade data, the ADVFN system would acknowledge the majority correctly with normal sized trades showing the correct side of the mid-point prices and being logged correctly as per the way market makers sit on bid and offer prices and how they offer shares in the market. This brings us nicely on to larger trades, though far less frequent than the smaller trades, but can be more difficult to decipher and more prone to being logged with less accuracy by ADVFN. The larger trades (sometimes a small multiple above normal market size offered by market makers or some of the larger ones we have seen in BRSD e.g. the 200k) are often delayed so when they are reported they are logged relative to the bid and offer price in the market at the point of logging the trade on ADVFN. As the price could have already moved, it can cause confusion on what the trade actually was and what it means for how a trader should react. This is something that comes with time but even more experienced folk can still struggle with. If you press "Go" on Level 2, any such trades will be realigned back to the time at which they were logged, whereby a more accurate representation of whether they were buys or sells can be seen (note that pressing "Go" post 8am will however refresh the intraday chart to only include the current day's price movement and not the previous day too - many trade off the two day charts on Level 2). If some of these trades fall right to the bottom or the price is completely out of kilter with current day prices (or even the previous day), it will be delayed and usually from a day or two before. ADVFN won't log this volume on the current date, and if it hasn't been logged on the day it happened (sometimes it can be the other side of the trade exchange or just delayed) it won't add to that day's volume either so there could be some significant volume missing on ADVFN from time to time. Corrections aren't accounted for correctly on ADVFN either so a 1.049m print being corrected with another 1.049m print (the deletion) and reapplication of the correct 1.094m will all add up on ADVFN to incorrectly skew the volume. All the shares move differently and the mechanics can vary, but when looking at BRSD, I can see the news has resulted in more interest and some buyers in size have come in to pick some larger blocks of shares up. However, seen as there are larger sellers still willing to sell in the market (the news isn't validation enough to change their perception of the valuation here) they are happy to meet that new demand for shares. The overall effect on the price is therefore minimal at presence with a slight down tick this morning as those larger aforementioned sellers work in the market, but the overall price being range bound at 20-25p. Ultimately it is a form of stalemate which could change with further bullish news or we could see further large demand come in for shares (which is part of the reason I am watching) that could cause a tipping point in the demand-supply dynamic that allows a clearing of these larger sellers holding the price back from breaking that key resistance at 25p. This is an observation based on the trade data and price mechanics currently at work here. It is one example where the principles can be applied to many others for the purposes of shorter term trading. Care still has to be taken to be vigilant as it does not guarantee the share will provide a trading opportunity, because the sellers can still rule the roost, and prices can even make new lows if large demand gets exhausted and sellers then keep working to push the price down where less resistance is offered, hence the need for stops and cutting positions and taking any small losses quickly if an error of judgement is made. Naturally there are SetsMM shares and various shares that all have different liquidity and participation which can slightly alter the way trade exchanges are logged and perceived. There is more to be said here, but it has become abit of seminar already so leave it there for now. Hope it helps All imo DYOR
echoridge: no they weren't. You're just wrong. Spreadex has no banking or advisory functions. They are basically just a stock broker. We will never 'see the back of them' as obviously their presence is simply because they have a customer or customers with a shareholding - probably through a spread bet. Now that client may be david lenigas, who the heck knows, but spreadex has no active role here whatsoever. Please educate yourself and then move on. There are important times ahead for Brandshield and people would like to discuss it here especially as the share price starts to make up its underperformance gap as this stubborn seller is cleared.
echoridge: Aiden - pray-fully for the last time, no one lied to anyone. The RTO was indeed an quicker way to IPO Brandshield, and the exchange ratio could have been a bit more generous to TSI legacy shareholders, but the RTO was a massive result for everyone in TSI as we now have a share in a fully-listed company focused on a rapidly growing niche within a massively growing sector. An IPO would have taken far longer, cost more money and TSI shareholders - as i have explained a number of times now - would have continued to own a shares in an investment vehicle with a scattered portfolio of minority investments and the TSI share price would have continued to labour under a big discount to the NAV of those holdings. Now, with Brandshield fully listed, management can and is focused on monetising their best of breed offering in a market sector that is forecast to grow from $8B to $13B, where BRSD is experiencing growth rates over 4x that overall growth.
echoridge: Whether it is or it isn't, it matters not a lick. Nothing matters for Brandshield and its share price now and for the very foreseeable future, except the business of protecting the products and brands, and shutting down the phishing attacks, fake websites and trolling that would otherwise undermine them, of as many companies - 77 and growing - as humanly possible. The more I look, the more I'm convinced that the company TSI shareholders have been reversed-merged with, is an undervalued gem. The business model is supremely scaleable and they're just embarking on a sales and marketing-led growth drive into a market with, as yet, few pure competitors. NOTHING. ELSE. MATTERS.
echoridge: I'm still poking around trying to confirm it, but I do think Friday's relatively heavy volume was probably the end of a very pesky seller and the price closing on the high probably confirmed it. I will have some thoughts on prospects and valuation tomorrow afternoon, but the share price looks primed for a long overdue move without any new news.
echoridge: because it isn't. margin on brandshield has gone up for non-professional traders bc its an illiquid name that IG gets charged very high rates by their own lenders to finance. BRSD went up along with a whole bunch of other names as of today. Any impact will now be largely finished as this was flagged and in the meantime, it appears to me that a large, long-term seller may finally be done (i.e.., 400k just traded on the bid, and the share price has gone UP). This is a powerful buy signal....more soon
aidenabettin: ?Our latest webinar starts on Tuesday 26 January at 18:00. We are joined by guest speakers from Orosur Mining, Savannah Resources, Rainbow Rare Earths and Goldplat. Register here.Less Ads, More Data, More Tools Register for FREE   Share PricesTwo Shields Investments Plc Share PriceTwo Shields Investments Plc Regulatory NewsBrandShield Update?Two Shields Investments Plc Regulatory News (TSI)?TSI SharePrice?TSI ShareNews?TSI ShareChat?TSI ShareTrades?TSILive RNSTSI Information There is currently no data for TSIBrandShield UpdateMon, 24th Aug 2020 07:00RNS Number : 8751WTwo Shields Investments PLC24 August 2020  Two Shields Investments plc("TSI", or the "Company")BrandShield UpdateTwo Shields Investments plc, the AIM quoted investment company with a strategy to build a high-quality portfolio of investments in fast growing and scalable digital and technology enabled businesses, is pleased to reproduce the following announcement issued by BrandShield, in which it currently has an 11.34% shareholding and a Convertible Loan Note subscription of $1.8m."BrandShield launching proof of concept in partnership with NTT DATA24 August 2020: BrandShield, a leading provider of cyber solutions from brand protection to online threat hunting, is pleased to announce its partnership with Trusted Global Innovator, NTT DATA. The two companies are performing a proof of concept on a new anti-phishing technology solution to help protect a leading Japanese financial organisation..BrandShield and NTT DATA are providing the organisation with a holistic online threat hunting solution, including proactive monitoring, detection of potential phishing websites, and identifying online impersonations. Furthermore, BrandShield will take down the online threats. The solution incorporates BrandShield's market-leading anti-phishing software and NTT DATA cyber security expertise. NTT DATA is a top 10 global business and IT services provider with more than 130,000 professionals in over 50 countries..Like many countries, Japan has experienced a steep rise in criminal cyber activity as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. Since the crisis began, BrandShield's online threat detection system has revealed a surge in fraudulent online activity, with key sectors being targeted including pharmaceuticals, medical supplies, banking, loan providers, entertainment, online gaming and logistics companies. Some of the biggest threats are cybercriminals who are trying to capitalise on fears around the disease, and in many cases using the identities of known companies or brands to trick worried consumers and employees. Attacks have included phishing sites, social phishing, fraudulent e-commerce sites, and fake medicine
echoridge: kaos - seriously? that's what you call research? You have no idea the service enhancements BRSD's new offering provides bc the company gave no detail. You think its basic machine vision when they refer to it with the language they do? For what purpose? To energise the share price for a couple of days? Is that this management's m.o. ever, in the slightest??? And fwiw, I do have an engineering degree, but you don't need an advanced degree to recognise a muppet.
aidenabettin: JW 5 reasons to buy Bidstack.Then the Bidstack shareprice crashed.Not to be trusted imo and i cant believe yoav is using him. Has to be a motive behind using it to boost the share price or drop it ?.With BIDS he pumped it to sell in collaboration with BIDS knowing the company was about to be completely restructured and grow from 4p and not 40p.I think we are lookingvat a merger/SPAC set up with Weshop but at what price?.If JW is here it may well be closer to 20p than 40p.Lets see what he has to say today.#notrust
echoridge: Look, there's no real harm in your continuing to yammer on about legacy assets (though I will say again, that there is real harm potentially about your continuing to insist on utterly phoney ideas like Spreadex is absolutely anything other than a broker facilitating client trades and instead 'shows up' to try and manage the share price. Yikes...),and I guess reminding shareholders that they exist at all is in some way a service. However, keeping to the quaint notion that what we know to be true should always supersede what we may think is so or, clearly in your case, what we really really really WANT to be true, we KNOW that the RTO/cap raise were done at a TSI price that semi-severely valued TSIs other holdings outside its stake in Brandshield. Therefore, QED, John Taylor and the rest of TSI management accepted, as the price of getting Brandshield - where they had far from a controlling stake - to agree to reverse into TSI and become a listed company, was the downgrading of the value of everything else they owned, most particularly Weshop. Now that does not mean that those assets can't be re-valued in the future, and you are right to hope for that, but it does mean, for now and for the immediate future that matters, we can state with confidence where new management's focus is and will be.
Brandshield Systems share price data is direct from the London Stock Exchange
ADVFN Advertorial
Your Recent History
Register now to watch these stocks streaming on the ADVFN Monitor.

Monitor lets you view up to 110 of your favourite stocks at once and is completely free to use.

By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions

P: V: D:20210414 17:35:32