We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Tools
Register for Free to get streaming real-time quotes, interactive charts, live options flow, and more.
| Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brandshield Systems Plc | LSE:BRSD | London | Ordinary Share | GB00BM97CN29 | ORD 1P |
| Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.00 | 0.0% | 3.58 | 0.00 | 00:00:00 |
| Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.50 | 4.00 | ||||
| Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| - |
| Last Trade Time | Trade Type | Trade Size | Trade Price | Currency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | O | 0 | 3.58 | GBX |
| Date | Time | Source | Headline |
|---|---|---|---|
| 23/10/2023 | 06:00 | UKREG | AIM Cancellation - BrandShield Systems plc |
| 19/10/2023 | 14:13 | UKREG | Brandshield Systems PLC TR-1: notification of major holdings |
| 18/10/2023 | 16:45 | UKREG | FTSE Russell Brandshield Systems |
| 13/10/2023 | 17:19 | ALNC |  TRADING UPDATES: Brandshield shareholders approve AIM delisting |
| 13/10/2023 | 11:51 | UKREG | Brandshield Systems PLC Result of General Meeting |
| 06/10/2023 | 06:00 | UKREG | Brandshield Systems PLC Result of Open Offer |
| 05/10/2023 | 06:00 | UKREG | Brandshield Systems PLC TR-1: Notification of major holdings |
| 02/10/2023 | 17:40 | ALNC | EARNINGS AND TRADING: EDX Medical reports loss; Brandshield CFO leaves |
| 02/10/2023 | 15:56 | UKREG | Brandshield Systems PLC TR-1: Notification of major holdings |
| 02/10/2023 | 14:57 | UKREG | Brandshield Systems PLC Board Change |
Brandshield Systems (BRSD) Share Charts1 Year Brandshield Systems Chart |
|
1 Month Brandshield Systems Chart |
Intraday Brandshield Systems Chart |
| Date | Time | Title | Posts |
|---|---|---|---|
| 30/11/2023 | 17:56 | BRSD Brandshield - formerly TSI (Two Shields) | 1,563 |
| Trade Time | Trade Price | Trade Size | Trade Value | Trade Type |
|---|
| Top Posts |
|---|
Posted at 20/9/2023 12:34 by kemche kemche - 10 May 2022 - 15:11:11 - 1282 of 1551 BRSD Brandshield - formerly TSI (Two Shields) - BRSDechoridge - 13 Sep 2021 - 07:46:30 - 1076 of 1282 BRSD Brandshield - formerly TSI (Two Shields) - BRSD what does spreadex have to do with anything? answer: absolutely nothing except in your twisted, 1975 mind. Market will like the growth and the obvious path to profitability if Q4 growth is as management is suggesting and the share price should push on from here. |
Posted at 20/9/2023 08:33 by the shuffle man They are screwing small private investors, the large share holders are funding the company and taking it private (delisted) with no regard for the minority shareholders. |
Posted at 25/8/2023 07:58 by kaos3 Rogen i am still very bulish.about the co. Which is different being bullish abou share price in the short term. Money was and is expected to be raised. To a rational man. Because sufficient cash flow is to be expected next year hopefully.Regarding personal attack - now twice - thank you for your personality introduction. To me and to the whole world. I was extremely exited then because i did the research and chat gpt is a partner which brsd kept silent about. I am still excited because they are rapidly employing meaning growth and neèd to finance that growth. I expect you to add nothing about brsd and am interested about further insights abot.myself. You must be popular. I find you as such. |
Posted at 03/7/2023 09:28 by kaos3 an example of the aquisition reserveThe fair value of the shares in Epic Group Limited has been determined from the admission price of Learning Technologies Group plc shares on re-admission to trading on AIM for 9 pence per share. The value of the consideration shares was £22,950,000. The fair value of the notional number of equity instruments that the legal subsidiary would have had to have issued to the legal parent to give the owners of the legal parent the same percentage ownership in the combined entity is 7.41 per cent of the market value of the shares after issues, being £1,836,000. The difference between the notional consideration paid by Learning Technologies Group plc for Epic Group Limited and the Learning Technologies Group plc net assets acquired of £728,000 has been charged to the Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income as a deemed cost of listing amounting to £1,108,000 with a corresponding entry to the reverse acquisition reserve. |
Posted at 25/5/2023 07:09 by kaos3 to me my alpine wind does the job - thinking about it. for all of them - young and old. i have no indoor plants. urban knowledge probably. fancy one.on brsd - today we will see if the price will be controlled. meaning they need controlled price for the usual things and plans like new equity issued, options and all the AIM lithany |
Posted at 24/5/2023 15:09 by kaos3 maurice ....it is not a pump ... they are free to sell we shop shares valued at cca 5-7 mil they are making cca 6 mil revenue with biggest and most sofisticated brands from finances, pharmacy, crypto, consumer, textile world cose brsd as their way to protecting their brand. such revenue gets valued like x 5 and they got chat gpt as a customer out of sooo many digital protection companies and by selling we shop shares they do not need fresh capital to power growth. this is just simply hugely undervalued.... and of systemic importance like miri has no competitors due to the IP, signed contracts, finished trials and developed marketplace and measuring system. hence II just gave more money to miri ... meaning they will not only survive - but thrive. they were given sign of approval. it will just take time |
Posted at 24/5/2023 14:46 by kaos3 after substracting we shop invstment of cca 7 mio atm .... we get brsd business for 3 mil - worth cca 50 mil if valuation metrics of some competitorsall appr or ... we will not need to issue shares any more as you wish |
Posted at 24/5/2023 13:46 by kaos3 now i did my last buy - now i ll telltype in chat gpt and brsd together from all the cyber cos brsd was chosen by the best ... this will fly it is going on for weeks |
Posted at 31/10/2022 10:21 by truffle Is this a serious business?In spite of a positive sounding interim report a month or so ago the share price keeps dropping. In the past two years the share price has fallen from around 30p to 7p! Hard to fathom what's really going on here |
Posted at 22/3/2021 10:24 by sphere25 Reb_Ban and Heatseek77,You have brought up an interesting topic, which I will post on for the benefit of those who appreciate my posts. Buys and sells are not invariably wrong. That would suggest that the ADVFN system is grossly flawed and market participants are not able to form reliable conclusions when looking at the trade data or indeed make trading decisions on the back of that data - rendering the subscription cost rather meaningless too. This is not the case with numerous examples of shares being posted recently whereby the deciphering of trades and the mechanics of how they influence a share price have been shown to provide fruitful opportunities (note that a firm grasp of the fundamentals is not a pre-requisite for short term traders if they can read the trade data and technicals well - hence why BRSD can also be stuck on a monitor and highlighted as an early stage viewing and potential trade at some point). All this has shown is that market participants can get reliably informed on the back of reading the ADVFN trade data, given some time and experience. Naturally, if you are long term orientated and looking e.g. 5-10 years out, it is of less relevance but I have known many longer term shareholders who have taken up short term trading in some of the shares they are involved with. Furthermore, if you are concentrating on particular shares and watching them more closely (rather than being diluted across many as per us short term trading folk), there is an argument to say that you can read the price moves, notice irregular orders on the book and get a much better feel for trading a particular share - particularly smaller caps where there is far less frenzied activity. So where can ADVFN trade data mislead on buys and sells? BRSD is a good example whereby the spread was 23-24p on Friday afternoon, but because there have been sellers in size in the market, shares were being offered well under the market offer price of 24p e.g. on there was a 3000 buy trade at 23.42p and two buy trades of 1247 and 23158 at 23.41p. This can be checked by doing a simple request for shares of around market size in a share dealing account where the dealing price on RSP will reflect the amounts quoted. ADVFN will log a trade in green if it is at the mid-point price of 23.5p. If it is above the mid-point price, it will be shown in blue as a buy, and conversely if it is below the mid-point price it will be shown in red as a sell. This is where one of the issues can arise with ADVFN when large sellers (this can also apply to fast moving shares on a brief intraday basis depending on market maker antics as per FUM on Friday where there were small time periods where buys were being logged as sells) are working in the market. These large sellers are putting downward pressure on the price and offering shares below the mid price, which means ADVFN will log them as sells. Now if enough volume comes in to clear (or begin to clear) these sellers, the whole dynamic can change and trades could then be above the mid-point price i.e. being logged in blue with possibly less pressure on the price. A big volume clear out or overhang clearance in one fair swoop can change the price dynamic drastically, and result in very few or no shares being available at even the full offer price, and the price then being bid up and moving more substantially by breaking negative or sideway trends. The only way I could see a firm review based conclusion of ADVFN trade data being invariably wrong (or even majority wrong) is if someone mainly has shares on the monitor that have these types of big sellers at work and then perhaps they are focusing more on the trades being logged as sells. If we took a basket of market maker only shares (particularly in their more dormant state outside of news where they sit without substantial movement for the majority of time periods) and observed the trade data, the ADVFN system would acknowledge the majority correctly with normal sized trades showing the correct side of the mid-point prices and being logged correctly as per the way market makers sit on bid and offer prices and how they offer shares in the market. This brings us nicely on to larger trades, though far less frequent than the smaller trades, but can be more difficult to decipher and more prone to being logged with less accuracy by ADVFN. The larger trades (sometimes a small multiple above normal market size offered by market makers or some of the larger ones we have seen in BRSD e.g. the 200k) are often delayed so when they are reported they are logged relative to the bid and offer price in the market at the point of logging the trade on ADVFN. As the price could have already moved, it can cause confusion on what the trade actually was and what it means for how a trader should react. This is something that comes with time but even more experienced folk can still struggle with. If you press "Go" on Level 2, any such trades will be realigned back to the time at which they were logged, whereby a more accurate representation of whether they were buys or sells can be seen (note that pressing "Go" post 8am will however refresh the intraday chart to only include the current day's price movement and not the previous day too - many trade off the two day charts on Level 2). If some of these trades fall right to the bottom or the price is completely out of kilter with current day prices (or even the previous day), it will be delayed and usually from a day or two before. ADVFN won't log this volume on the current date, and if it hasn't been logged on the day it happened (sometimes it can be the other side of the trade exchange or just delayed) it won't add to that day's volume either so there could be some significant volume missing on ADVFN from time to time. Corrections aren't accounted for correctly on ADVFN either so a 1.049m print being corrected with another 1.049m print (the deletion) and reapplication of the correct 1.094m will all add up on ADVFN to incorrectly skew the volume. All the shares move differently and the mechanics can vary, but when looking at BRSD, I can see the news has resulted in more interest and some buyers in size have come in to pick some larger blocks of shares up. However, seen as there are larger sellers still willing to sell in the market (the news isn't validation enough to change their perception of the valuation here) they are happy to meet that new demand for shares. The overall effect on the price is therefore minimal at presence with a slight down tick this morning as those larger aforementioned sellers work in the market, but the overall price being range bound at 20-25p. Ultimately it is a form of stalemate which could change with further bullish news or we could see further large demand come in for shares (which is part of the reason I am watching) that could cause a tipping point in the demand-supply dynamic that allows a clearing of these larger sellers holding the price back from breaking that key resistance at 25p. This is an observation based on the trade data and price mechanics currently at work here. It is one example where the principles can be applied to many others for the purposes of shorter term trading. Care still has to be taken to be vigilant as it does not guarantee the share will provide a trading opportunity, because the sellers can still rule the roost, and prices can even make new lows if large demand gets exhausted and sellers then keep working to push the price down where less resistance is offered, hence the need for stops and cutting positions and taking any small losses quickly if an error of judgement is made. Naturally there are SetsMM shares and various shares that all have different liquidity and participation which can slightly alter the way trade exchanges are logged and perceived. There is more to be said here, but it has become abit of seminar already so leave it there for now. Hope it helps All imo DYOR |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
|
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com |
| ADVFN UK Investors Hub ADVFN Italy ADVFN Australia ADVFN Brazil |
| ADVFN Canada ADVFN Germany ADVFN Japan ADVFN Mexico |
| ADVFN France ADVFN US ADVFN Korea |
