BMR Mining Share Discussion Threads

[fireball xl5] 12/6/2015 17:45

Not quite a BMR Friday, but every little helps!

[qsmeily456] 12/6/2015 17:31

And whoosh LOLsss

[qsmeily456] 10/6/2015 16:20

Indeed in breakout last time this got close to 10p so be nice to see that tested LOLsss

[fireball xl5] 10/6/2015 09:05

Another 2.4 million in old money QS and spread has tightened. Looking a little healthier now.

[qsmeily456] 09/6/2015 18:38

Buy of 4 million in old shares. 4.5p is still less than AB. Confident purchase LOLsss

[qsmeily456] 09/6/2015 11:44

Good to hear balls.

If assets are more or less as MA acquired then whilst the books might have been adjusted the mine and airfield and ability to process are all going to mean 30p in a short space of time once they put the plant in place.

4p is 1p under water for AB so that's good enough for me LOLsss.

See you Soooooon hopefully?

[qsmeily456] 08/6/2015 10:03

I hear what you say obout posting BUT if you still have the same holding then arguably you have the same if not Greater interest in doing the same or a better job than you did when MA was Chairman LOLsss

[qsmeily456] 08/6/2015 09:44

Check out Dennis and the legal advisor balls.

AB I believe will increase shareholder value and produce.....but then what.....LOLsss

[fireball xl5] 08/6/2015 09:41

Digger, problem is nostrils are picking up an odious scent from the present incumbents, has he sniffed the new management line. Cut to the chase QS, what's the word on the street, are they cutting a deal or are they going to bulk out another RNS for their fodder.

[qsmeily456] 08/6/2015 09:36

AB seems an excellent front man who's clearly switched on. I personally believe although assets have been written down short term they are still in our ownership with the odd exception. The share price could consequently recover reasonably quickly to former levels. I for one am now slowly building a stake now the decks are cleared and MA is no longer able to act illegally extracting cash via family and back doors.

BMM sold a copper plant. I'd like to see the original purchase DD valuation and the disposal DD valuation. In fact I'll be pressing for exposure of all purchase DD paperwork and the same for any sales so if there is illegal acts I can take swift legal action. Just because agreements have been signed it does not prevent or stop legal action and collectively this would just be a few £'s if it was focused and targeted LOLsss

[fireball xl5] 08/6/2015 09:34

As Manuel would say "Que", "I know nothing Mr QS". You can think what you think or feel what you feel, means little to me and you will never know, unless you join Stav baby on a London outing. I am the holder of my own conscience and I am happy that I played no part in BMR, apart from that of an active stakeholder on the BB's. Your judgement was far sounder than mine and I shall remember that chasing rainbows gets one totally washed out. The only wrongdoing is one of belief in a cause or project and the foolhardiness of committing large sums of my cash to MA's sting.

[landersd] 08/6/2015 09:21

Smelly, whilst I take my hat off to you for your distrust in MA, your diplomacy needs a little refining.

There are many PI's showing substantial losses at the moment, the last thing they need/want is someone lourding it up !!

[qsmeily456] 07/6/2015 21:46

Balls

The evidence speaks volumes....

When MA was in charge you were a prolific poster, anything and everything metal related.

I constantly accused you of being hired help paid to post. Seems like I said MA was the pits at running a company and now you......everything seems to have been bang on LOLsss

[qsmeily456] 05/6/2015 14:58

Back to present BOD resolution levels not that impressive. Be nice to see 10p. If the new Chairman and CEO thinks 5p is a good price thats good enough for me LOLsss

[qsmeily456] 05/6/2015 08:28

Digger

You still hearing things......oh no just an echo LOLsss

[ivanivan1] 02/6/2015 23:35

So why are bid-ask spreads different when it comes to different stocks?As in any marketplace, one of the most influential factors on pricing is how plentiful or scarce are the number of buyers, sellers as well as the volume of shares being traded. If a stock is illiquid, that is, it is not traded very often - and therefore can't be sold to convert to cash easily and quickly – the bid-ask spread is likely to be wider. By contrast, narrow bid-ask spreads are generally observed in shares that trade in greater volume essentially reflecting the increased likelihood that there will be buyers and sellers available across the range of price levels.Volatility is another key determinant of the bid-ask spread. In more volatile stocks, bid-ask spreads tend to be wider reflecting the greater range of possible share price valuations.A further factor contributing to the range of a bid-ask spread is the degree of market transparency and information symmetry of company information for each individual stock. Stocks in larger companies which are generally perceived as offering greater transparency and symmetry of information (i.e. where market participants have close to equal knowledge), will generally have a tighter bid-ask spread as accurate share price valuations are more readily obtained and there is less disparity in valuations where buyers and sellers have access to the same information.In summary then, the size of the bid-ask spread of a stock will vary depending on several factors including the differing valuations ascribed by individual investors, the number of buyers and sellers and the volume of shares traded, stock price volatility and the degree to which information about a company's performance and prospects are available to all market participants. Based on these factors, the bid-ask spread is usually greater for small cap stocks whose shares may be tightly held and infrequently traded, for whom pricing volatility is also more pronounced and where the level of information transparency and symmetry is comparatively lowest.

[kwizza] 02/6/2015 15:54

So where to from here then ?

[fireball xl5] 02/6/2015 10:10

Eons mate LOL!

[landersd] 02/6/2015 09:46

Stab,QS,FB, seems a long time ago that we bought into the idea of noise cancelling software lol.

Digger

[qsmeily456] 01/6/2015 18:56

There we go consolidate and down it goes just as the BOD we're told. Much easier mentally to mark it down to 3p than 0.3 for MM's.

So all those who voted in support deserve what you voted for. Weak breeds weakness LOLsss