Berkeley Energia Share Discussion Threads

[wiseacre] 15/9/2015 16:58

Has no one noticed. This must be the best performing resources stock in the firmament

[piedro] 10/12/2014 10:11

100,000 signatures .... from a population of how many?

[giddi] 10/12/2014 08:52

hxxp://www.eldiario.es/meseta/firmas-contras-uranio-provincia-Salamanca_6_333226699.html

[piedro] 18/10/2013 08:51

Annual Report 2013

[mally6] 08/10/2013 11:31

THOSE THAT GRABBED GOT SMASHED

[corbine] 08/10/2013 11:26

yup-smash n grab- gta v comes to mind :-)

[ukmassy] 08/10/2013 11:14

Moved down quite quickly too!

[corbine] 08/10/2013 10:53

15.9 gone- moved quite quickly :-)

[bam bam rubble] 26/9/2013 11:28

The uranium price in the last month was $34-35 while over the last twenty years the price averaged around $33/lb.
On that basis a suitable base case would be $35-40 whereas in today's pre-feasibility study BKY have used $65/lb?
The absence of NPV/IRR figures suggest they were bad even at that high price. At today's price surely non-viable.

[devonlad] 19/2/2013 08:35

Had a nibble here, breaking out of nearly two years resistance and a nice gap in that chart coming up and the aussies buying, only a small punt though!

[langostino] 28/9/2012 13:45

google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=auto&tl=en&u=http%3A%2F%2Fsociedad.elpais.com%2Fsociedad%2F2012%2F09%2F27%2Factualidad%2F1348770783_445754.html

of interest to bky holders

better link:

[n3tleylucas] 06/7/2012 10:26

ASX Price and Volume Query
Please find below a copy of Berkeley Resources Ltd's response to a price movement query from the Australian Securities Exchange:


6 July 2012

Ms Fiona Murphy
ASX Compliance Pty Limited
Level 8, Exchange Plaza
2 The Esplanade
PERTH WA 6000

By email: [e-mail]


Dear Fiona

Response to Price and Volume Query

In response to your correspondence dated 5 July 2012 regarding a change in the Company's share price and in the volume of trading in the securities, the Company's response is as follows:

1. The Company is in ongoing discussions with all stakeholders in relation to the previously announced dispute with the aim of achieving an amicable solution. The outcome of those discussions and timing of any agreement by the stakeholders is uncertain.

2. The Company is not in a position to make an announcement with respect to the ongoing discussions.

The Company is not aware of any other information that has not been announced which, if known, could be an explanation for recent trading in the securities of the Company.

3. The Company has no explanation as to why there has been an increase in the price and volume of trading in the securities of the Company.

4. The Company confirms that it is in compliance with the listing rules, in particular, Listing Rule 3.1.


Yours faithfully





CLINT MCGHIE
Company Secretary

[langostino] 29/5/2012 15:55

I have seen upstart outsiders taking the connected locals to court before and they seldom win. I know this is in neutral Paris and don't know the finer points here but the price will drift down as we all get bored and find more exciting prospects. I have been in and out of BKY a couple of times and never made any headway although I like the story. I hold APF also and am suffering buyer's remorse there although, again, I like the investment case. Just difficult days, I suppose

[piedro] 29/5/2012 11:06

langostino,

Enusa are certainly being more forceful in their arguments but I wonder
how much is just politics.
Notably, Berkeley has been changing their management; either there
really is something wrong with the project or they didn't understand
the 'Latin' mentality - IMHO

As it is very quiet on this bb - I mostly publish BKY happenings on over
at APY, the principal shareholder (15%) + royalties - cf: #370 / 383 / 389-390

[langostino] 29/5/2012 09:48

But Enusa sound pretty sure of themselves too. They should deal

[piedro] 02/4/2012 08:19

2 April 2012
Berkeley Initiates International Arbitration against Enusa for an amount exceeding US$200 million
....
.... Berkeley Managing Director, Brendan James stated "Delays on the joint venture project have been disappointing, and could not be allowed to continue indefinitely. Arbitration is not the preferred outcome for Berkeley, or for the region of Ciudad Rodrigo, but one we are forced to undertake to defend our rights, and to achieve a resolution. It is important to note that this action will not distract the management team from delivering upon Berkeley's 100%-owned Salamanca I project. Being completely independent of the Joint Venture Project, the Salamanca I project remains on-schedule, and we expect to initiate construction in 2013".


... at last !!

[piedro] 07/3/2012 10:47

Uranium industry warms up after Fukushima
A year since Japan's Fukushima nuclear disaster, uranium explorers and producers are starting to regain confidence in the industry's long-term outlook.
Author: By Julie Gordon
Posted: Wednesday , 07 Mar 2012

[piedro] 01/3/2012 19:17

La plataforma pro-minas de uranio pedirá el martes al presidente de ENUSA la reapertura
La Plataforma pro apertura de la Mina de Uranio de Saelices el Chico-Ciudad Rodrigo ya está en marcha. Los promotores de la misma (es decir, Miguel Cid Cebrián, exalcalde de Miróbriga, y las 14 asociaciones vecinales integradas en Fevesa), presentaron en la mañana del sábado en rueda de prensa el planteamiento inicial de este nuevo organismo. ....


... a pro-mine group pleading the reopening ..

[piedro] 01/3/2012 16:15

La reapertura de la mina de uranio de Salamanca será decisión del Gobierno
07-02-2012
La mina de uranio de Salamanca, ubicada en la localidad de Saelices El Chico y en la que los trabajos de extracción finalizaron en 2000, se reabrirá en función de un estudio de viabilidad que efectúa ENUSA, aunque en última instancia la decisión será del Gobierno de España.
Ésta es una de las conclusiones obtenidas tras la reunión celebrada hoy en Madrid entre los miembros de la Plataforma Promina de Ciudad Rodrigo (Salamanca) y los responsables de ENUSA, entre los que se encontraba el presidente, José Luis González.
Según un comunicado de la plataforma, emitido tras la reunión, a ENUSA se le ha trasladado que "la reanudación de la explotación de la mina sería importantísima" para remediar los problemas de despoblación, desempleo y envejecimiento que existe en esta zona del oeste de Salamanca.
La plataforma ha informado de que el próximo 23 de febrero ENUSA responderá al estudio de viabilidad presentado por Berkeley, empresa de capital australiano que ha adquirido por valor de cinco millones de euros los activos de ENUSA en Saelices El Chico y La Alameda de Gardón.
Aún así, el comunicado reza que ENUSA ha dejado claro que la última decisión, en relación a la reapertura de la mina, será de los responsables del Gobierno y, más concretamente, de los ministerios de Hacienda, Economía e Industria.
En caso de que se aprobara la reapertura de la mina, Berkeley y ENUSA constituirían una sociedad de explotación, donde la primera tendría el 90" del capital y la empresa estatal el 10%.
Las minas de uranio de Saelices El Chico fueron explotadas entre 1975 y el año 2000.
La provincia de Salamanca es la que mayor concentración de mineral de uranio tiene en España.
De momento, ENUSA no se ha pronunciado al respecto ya que han recordado que, sobre esta cuestión, existe un pacto de confidencialidad con Berkeley.


Basically, it says ...
The final decision is with the Spanish Government
The exploitation of the mine would be v.important in resolving the problem of unemployment and depopulation of the region.
On the 23 Febuary, ENUSA would respond to the factibility study presented by Berkeley.
To the date ENUSA has not made a pronouncement as they have a confidentiallity pact.

[peterbill] 17/2/2012 10:38

Any views or expectations on this ...


Update on the Berkeley-Enusa JV Uranium Project ...

... Berkeley has extended the deadline to 29 February 2012, following the recent change in government in Spain.

Also, Berkeley and Enusa have jointly agreed to extend the deadline for Enusa to inform Berkeley of its conclusions on the Feasibility Study, to no later than 23 February 2012. This review is in consideration of the Mining Domain Conceptual Basic Engineering Report (CBER) delivered by Berkeley on 10 November 2011.

...Once the agreed formalities and conditions have been fulfilled, both companies will proceed to finalise the agreements and form NEWCO.

The incorporation of NEWCO triggers the payment of €20M to Enusa within 30 days of formation...

PB

[piedro] 30/12/2011 10:00

Another Director resigns
Only been on the board since October 2010

[ferdy1] 13/12/2011 14:48

News this week?

[monis] 11/11/2011 11:15

buy at 26.2p