Batm Advanced Communicat... Share Discussion Threads

[echoridge] 29/6/2022 09:41

obviously, no one is ever going to confuse me with a kooba fan, but it would be really great if whoever it was that ticked his most recent post 'down' could make themselves known in order to explain what issue they could possibly have with his latest post. It was a perfectly fact-supported view that happened to be the tiniest bit bullish, or at least serves to remind shareholders that the balance of probability behind this interminable silence is not down to a material negative change in the operating businesses. Never took notice of this kind of nonsense before, and probably never will again, but I'm genuinely curious: show yourself and let's hear your reasoning.

[kooba] 29/6/2022 07:39

Think the consolation is that whatever is going on if there was for any reason a material negative on trading ..which would appear unlikely on their full year result update..then it would still have to be released to the market without delay. So one must presume that that update of positive trading remains intact. Tomorrow is the last day of the first half.So the official line is still"Looking ahead, we entered the new year with sustained momentum across the business and we remain on track to deliver significant growth for full year 2022, in line with market expectations. We have established solid foundations in core technologies that are now at an inflexion point of becoming market disrupters. We will continue to cultivate growth and development across our business as well as pursue opportunities to accelerate the realisation of the value of the IP within our different units through strategic transactions. We have an exciting future ahead of us and we look forward to reporting on our progress and delivering value for our shareholders. "The old..accelerate the realisation of the value of the IP within our different units through strategic transactions.May well be a key to the sheer lack of comms and buyback..can only hope so.

[fse] 28/6/2022 16:00

Well management and their advisers have really dropped the ball on this. They really do need to say something. The complete black out on any comment is hard to rationalise.

[gbenson1] 28/6/2022 14:52

Can't believe the mms are selling these shares at this low price with not much upward price action, they seem to be in a range 34-37p with the seller drip feeding, the company have got to issue a statement within regulation guidelines!! Come of Zvi get your finger out..

[car1pet] 28/6/2022 11:55

You are bang on right wizz. I've been critical of the management team for years. Hopefully this is the end game then Marom can do his thing.

[wizzkid211] 28/6/2022 11:14

CARPET You never did like the crew did you...

[car1pet] 28/6/2022 09:43

I just want 50/60p for my shares then the company can do whatever it wants. I don't want to go near this crew ever again

[kooba] 28/6/2022 09:15

https://twitter.com/batmltd/status/1541655139617996800?s=21&t=vESU8Nz2JxHzSiVKQuyxoQThe bio waste space is expanding rapidly..can only hope the company are getting orders then.There are regulatory essential things that need an rns..but there is rns reach for non essential information to the market to show traction in the markets they serve...and product development progress.BATM used to like banging even small news out.Now? Either the businesses are not progressing or the company just doesn't want to say anything. Quiet odd.

[car1pet] 28/6/2022 09:01

The 6 month trading update will be published in August. That should make for interesting reading!!!

[fse] 26/6/2022 22:30

>wizz. Exactly I had some seed cap start up plays over there. Spread is mean
Actually still have a couple like IMG still there. What would I know !

[wizzkid211] 26/6/2022 21:15

Just for the record i can remember buying and selling on the OTC from 1999 in uk companies such as GEO interactive media gp. BATM and others, the spread is wider than the uk. and the price is in USD. You just have to find the right broker.

[kooba] 26/6/2022 20:58

I get your point fella , it's just not a point.The guy ..I wasted time listening (at 6'30") is saying that when a share is deleted ( note deleted not delisted) on OTC it may be because it has 'been' taken over ..or because it can't meet requirements. Can be any reason...I imagine in the case of BATM just total lack of interest or volume.Key point is you are deleted after the corporate event completes that results in the OTC facility not being appropriate ..not before!You really think they would cancel an OTC facility as a precursor to a major corporate deal..all on the quiet like! Once again if the company has asked for the OTC facility in BATM to be deleted they should tell their shareholders and the reason...but many companies announce the facility as though it's a big thing then say nothing when it's deleted...it must be deemed no price sensitive ..if it is they are in breach of the rules I guess.I see this makes no difference to whatever is going on and reading more into it is wrong.

[fse] 26/6/2022 19:59

Kooba. You missed the point.
You seem to want to argue with everyone why don’t you look at the link I provided before talking out of your !

Added. I am referring to the implications of the removal from OTC. a helpful American chap explained what the reasons could be.

[kooba] 26/6/2022 18:33

Yep Simon Thomson's had a few shockers..I'm not sure he would be able to provide an update here as like shareholders there is nothing much to say ..they just halved. But he could reiterate his buy at 37p now though, show he's still following.He normally does updates when there's news ..so nothing there.

[kooba] 26/6/2022 18:28

FSE...if they had delisted from a recognised market they would have had to announce..its not a listing..it's a facility with a dealing code. Being listed there are regulatory requirements , on OTC there are none.So since its not even a requirement to inform the market of no longer having an OTC facility I'm not sure it's a major clue to any puzzle. The puzzle remains and is becoming increasingly annoying in the company's treatment of its shareholders.Gather nobody has heard back from the company or it's advisors?It would not hurt to put together a nothing response thanking shareholders for their enquiry and saying they will update the market as per their regulatory requirement in due course.In the meantime they leave shareholders stonewalled and puzzled.

[fse] 26/6/2022 18:03

FWIW I agree with ST coverage. BATM. should have had very strong support @80p on fundamentals and that’s ascribing little value to their IP. Their sum of the parts or break up valuations in the 170p range.
But we had a bad slide due to a series of unrelated events then the start of a major market correction.
Now we have a media blackout from the company and their brokers issuing none of their reports/updates

[resistance1] 26/6/2022 16:55

TASE up over 7% at one point before profit taking.

[echoridge] 26/6/2022 16:00

First off, no one at IC has been 'ramping' bvc. Secondly, the bear market in all of small cap UK this year has generally made even the legitimate financial tipsters like the ones at the IC look a bit foolish, so it shouldn't surprise anyone if many of them are keeping their heads down right now. A few more weeks like the last one however, and that probably won't last.

[car1pet] 26/6/2022 15:45

The guy on investor's chronicle who kept ramping the share has been quiet.

[car1pet] 26/6/2022 15:43

The guy on investor's chronicle who kept ramping the share has been quiet.

[fse] 26/6/2022 15:21

Kooba. Point is that it was listed on OTC. Under BATVF for many years. It’s inclusion does not amount to a handful of beans. It being suddenly dropped with no comment is an indicator that it was for a specific set of reasons. It’s a clue and coupled with the company media blackout would suggest a sale or acquisition being in pole position. Obviously we would like to hear from the company.

[wizzkid211] 26/6/2022 09:06

TASE catching up on London up almost 5% this am

[kooba] 25/6/2022 17:23

"Listing" is inappropriate terminology really..a listing would be on a recognised regulated exchange. OTC is just a facility really for situations that don't qualify for inter dealer transactions..but i don't really care as i think this might be a bit of a red herring. It was an historic facility that i presume saw very little activity..so whether it was the company who removed it or whether it was the otc platform or sponsor that did..i have no idea.Just wish the company would give some clarity so we can move on !"Over-the-counter (OTC) securities are securities that are not listed on a major exchange in the United States and are instead traded via a broker-dealer network, usually because many are smaller companies and do not meet the requirements to be listed on a formal exchange."