Batm Advanced Communicat... Share Discussion Threads

[sandy789] 08/2/2022 09:28

Novice investors ought not to be investing in stocks such as Batm. They naturally come with a health warning. They only invest in the hope of a fast buck. If you can't take the pain learn how to put stops in.

[kooba] 08/2/2022 09:13

misinformation..you are welcome.

[the crypt] 08/2/2022 08:23

That's not nice! Saying I offer nothing!

[bigjon1] 07/2/2022 22:35

This may be to complex to wrap you pea-brain around but it is possible to have multiple accounts, for example when you get a new email. Instead of trying to belittle people why don't you get your facts straight. Everyone here seems to be smart enough to clock that the report is a hoax designed to attractive incompetent investors to act accordingly. Look at the fundamentals, their balance sheet is strong ($12.26 million profit after tax, up from $4.3 million the year before). They are one of the few tech companies that are truly diversified (BATM’s portfolio includes a mix of established and novel technologies, and targets a range of sub-segments, customer types and geographical markets). Not to mention they have reinstated dividends. Why would a struggling company reinstate dividends, surely they would need to keep the money if they were struggling so much? All I've read from your posts is waffle. If you are so confident BATM is a prime shorting stock then please humour me your reasoning.

[kooba] 07/2/2022 21:46

'Used to read the chat for alternative opinions ..'In the two days you've had an account..that adds up !

[cumnor] 07/2/2022 21:18

Yea-dire when Roland Rat is hailed the next Sage of Omaha by a very dubious poster.

[bigjon1] 07/2/2022 21:10

This chat has become a bit of a laughing stock. Used to read the chat for alternative opinions but now people just sprout rubbish about the stock. Even though it is doing very well with strong earnings of $12.26 million profit after tax up from $4.3 million the year before. Some of these blogs have made me questioned poeples' intentions here. Anyone that read the shorter report from Ennismore and cross references it with accurate sources would have instantly clocked that it was a shorter attempting to entice novice investors to follow suit. Yes it could gain traction but as always when the 'hype' dies down those that followed the hype will be the worst off. BATM isn't going anywhere.

[james dean] 07/2/2022 21:04

.
Nice one.

[fse] 07/2/2022 20:23

I went to one of the corners of the flat earth society last summer in Newfoundland. I took a picture at the top of the hill and am willing to post it for anyone saying it is not so. Flat as far as the eye could see.

[unctuous] 07/2/2022 18:22

Once again, chill. Some years there’s a pre-results trading update, some years there isn’t. In years where there is one, sometimes it’s released by now and sometimes it isn’t.

[kooba] 07/2/2022 17:59

Yep there are some serious allegations in there and i have seen these things end up in the main media if they are not challenged and knocked on the head.Staying quiet and hoping things go away i have never thought a grown up strategy. The blog may not have much direct reach but it is being shared on shorting communities on twitter maybe someone with more clout joins the party if they think the company cant answer. These things can fester I’ve found.It’s my opinion , i thought that was the point of these boards..not saying that is correct but it is an opinion i have and don’t think attacking someone for saying the company should put the record straight is normal.

[nellyb] 07/2/2022 17:52

honest question - so you are an ex-city employee and would like or expect batm to initate a public rebuttal to ratty the rat's allegations? have i got that right?

[kooba] 07/2/2022 17:38

It is the mobile number as of very recently.
I don’t care whether you believe me or not really wizz…enough playing stupid games.
You tell me the last four digits and i will tell you you are wrong as i know i am right ..maybe you have the landline last four..2527.
Chin chin

[kooba] 07/2/2022 17:34

Sorry i have to demonstrate what exactly to you ?
I know the stock but had sold higher up i got back in Thursday , somebody not me posted the blog Friday..shares sank having been already weak on the index fiasco..i don’t think that is correct decision btw and how will it attract listings to London exactly what is what they apparently want to do. So new to thread but might have been around March 2020 when i last bought in ..why ..I bought in Thursday and saw the blog and read it on Friday..was i happy no not so much i read it in more detail yesterday and my concern was not improved at all.
As to poor advice in responding ..i don’t believe so. Dealing with it quickly and factually answering such allegations i have always found to be the correct way..some may surmise that by not responding there are not easy answers and that the allegations are true…i don’t know, but i do know that reputation is important and takes a long time to establish but can be lost instantly . I have seen trash pieces on a number of stocks over the years this is not just made up stuff as far as i can see and is backed by documented evidence of some transactions that i would consider connected and conflicting..i do not have originals obviously so cannot vouch for authenticity but unlike some cannot just dismiss allegations like this out of hand.
What facts exactly do you want from me?? I am nothing to do with the author or any other avatar on here. Just me , been around for a while ..ex city. Everyone has questioned my motives when if anyone bothered to read earlier i was suggesting that if the whole blog piece was incorrect and fabricated with the intent of knocking the share price for personal gain then i believed it could fall under MAR rules of market manipulation..even posted the regulations..does that really make me the author !! The attacks because i have suggested the company defends itself are really very odd. I have also not seen anything posted that rebuts anything raised to be fair..as most comments are against me not the allegations, any responses are merely hearsay. What i would like is facts gleaned from public information that prove the blogger wrong ..if anyone can provide such evidence would be great. Was tempted to walk from my position as small up but have held..too busy rebuffing nonsense.
You are all playing the wrong guy..maybe upset as in at the wrong level i don’t know but turning me into the target of your frustrations in some conspiracy BS is all it is ..total BS.

[wizzkid211] 07/2/2022 17:29

KOOBA
No thats NOT the number!
I dont believe you...

[kooba] 07/2/2022 15:46

We was as in you and your demented army ..you cant follow anything it's troubling.

[homeboy] 07/2/2022 15:43

resistance1 is also FSE, i swear it on someone else's baby, lol