ADVFN Logo ADVFN

We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.

Trending Now

Toplists

It looks like you aren't logged in.
Click the button below to log in and view your recent history.

Hot Features

Registration Strip Icon for monitor Customisable watchlists with full streaming quotes from leading exchanges, such as LSE, NASDAQ, NYSE, AMEX, Bovespa, BIT and more.

ARA Aura Renewable Acquisitions Plc

4.25
0.00 (0.00%)
13 Dec 2024 - Closed
Delayed by 15 minutes
Share Name Share Symbol Market Type Share ISIN Share Description
Aura Renewable Acquisitions Plc LSE:ARA London Ordinary Share GB00BKPH9N11 ORD 1P
  Price Change % Change Share Price Bid Price Offer Price High Price Low Price Open Price Shares Traded Last Trade
  0.00 0.00% 4.25 - 0.00 00:00:00
Industry Sector Turnover Profit EPS - Basic PE Ratio Market Cap
Investors, Nec 0 -153k -0.0146 -2.91 446.25k
Aura Renewable Acquisitions Plc is listed in the Investors sector of the London Stock Exchange with ticker ARA. The last closing price for Aura Renewable Acquisiti... was 4.25p. Over the last year, Aura Renewable Acquisiti... shares have traded in a share price range of 4.25p to 6.25p.

Aura Renewable Acquisiti... currently has 10,500,000 shares in issue. The market capitalisation of Aura Renewable Acquisiti... is £446,250 . Aura Renewable Acquisiti... has a price to earnings ratio (PE ratio) of -2.91.

Aura Renewable Acquisiti... Share Discussion Threads

Showing 126 to 144 of 700 messages
Chat Pages: Latest  16  15  14  13  12  11  10  9  8  7  6  5  Older
DateSubjectAuthorDiscuss
15/2/2007
09:55
Thu 15 Feb 2007

Ardana shares surge 5% on positive results for drug trial
HAMISH RUTHERFORD (hrutherford@scotsman.com)
ARDANA shares rose almost 5 per cent yesterday after it received favourable results from a study for its potentially lucrative drug Teverelix, which could become a major treatment of advanced prostate cancer.

The Edinburgh specialist pharmaceutical company said the eight-week trial was to determine whether Teverelix was effective suppressing testosterone levels in both normal weight and obese subjects, and showed it was effective for both.

While the treatment is unlikely to hit the market before 2009, further trials are pending, Teverelix is regarded by the City as Ardana's most promising drug, with potential sales estimated in the hundreds of millions.

Reducing levels of testosterone can help slow the growth of prostate cancer when the disease is advanced, with many patients facing castration.

Ardana said previous studies for the treatment confirmed it could suppress the male hormone at the same level as castration.

In December, Ardana said it was in advanced negotiations over a potential partnership to help pay for the remaining trials and commercialisation for Teverelix.

An additional Phase II study in patients with advanced prostate cancer is underway with results expected in the second quarter of 2007, and phase three studies could be underway this summer.

Chief executive Maureen Lindsay said the company was "very encouraged" by the progress in the development of its long-acting formulation of Teverelix.

"This programme of studies continues to support the development of Teverelix LA as a potential new treatment for prostate cancer, a disease where new therapies remain a major medical need in a multi-billion dollar market."

Shares rose 5.5p to 120.5p, yesterday, its highest close since October, valuing the company at around £78 million.

This article:

Last updated: 15-Feb-07 00:21 GMT

fickena
14/2/2007
16:37
Good to see some life in the share today. Hopefully a major uptrend underway, in anticipation of a deal or even takeover.
gnomet2
14/2/2007
13:36
Tipped in the Independent as a BUY today.....!!
vpatel25
14/2/2007
08:09
Another box ticked towards a Licesnsing deal which is already at an advanced stage.
n_w_b
12/2/2007
18:37
Post removed by ADVFN
Abuse team
12/2/2007
18:27
I agree - bought in on friday. Looks to me like something is cooking!
jonfa
12/2/2007
18:26
I rckon this has started to climb.
goodgrief
07/2/2007
16:22
I rckon this has further to fall.
qazwsx123
29/12/2006
09:25
The IC tip, posted last week, is in todays edition. There wasn't a printed edition last week.
n_w_b
24/12/2006
05:23
Thanks for your thoughts on that issue n_w_b. Have a good Xmas.
gnomet2
22/12/2006
21:35
Ok, I see what you mean now, no figures mentioned, but I and the press at the Analyst meeting take "The findings in this study confirm the effects of Teverelix LA on symptoms of BPH as previously reported." as what was reported before. Maybe was rushed out to statisfy investers, but they've been reported as a positive trial.

Trial ARD-0301-001 was to look at the safety and effects of two different single dosses of Teverelix in BPH patients for 3 months. There is a follow on trial ARD-0301-002, giving the patients the same dose they received in 001, after they have become non-responders.

Therefore it was a dose finding study which confirmed previous results "Teverelix LA, administered as a single subcutaneous injection, demonstrated symptomatic improvement from as early as week two and the duration of the effect appears to be in the order of 8 weeks based upon a preliminary analysis of the relevant clinical endpoint, the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS). "

Ok, they might not have had time to go through the data and report which dose was superior, but the effects were the same and this is what counts. Maybe once 002 is complete, they'll have a fuller picture.

Theres also another PII apoptosis study in the US in BPH patients. The aim of the study is to look at the effects of Teverelix on cell death in prostate biopsies from patients with BPH. This trial is mostly of acedemic value, however it opens the door into US clinics.

So these seperate PII trials are additional requirements the FDA requires and not "proof of concept" like the first PII trial.

n_w_b
22/12/2006
20:17
These the two trials for comparison btw
gnomet2
22/12/2006
20:10
Where did it say what? :) What I'm saying is what it didn't say, and couldn't say (at least at this point)- ie that these effects were of a degree that were statistically significant,which they were in the earlier trial.After all, that's what having placebo controls etc is all about - determining whether any positive effects could be down to chance.

This isn't a trivial issue because I think it's likely to influence the the size and cost of a phase 3 trial, the degree of effectiveness of the treatment(and hence its sales potential)and its perceived risk of failure at phase3 (very low,I think,but phase 3s typically require stats showing p = 0.01 or better, which was actually achieved in the earlier trial).

Maybe the data analysis takes a lot longer than I think, or they felt they had to rush out a preliminary statement with the results and the further analysis will be able to cite some good stats in line with those reported in the earlier trial.

gnomet2
22/12/2006
08:23
I'm lost, where did it say that?

This is what they said.

"The findings in this study confirm the effects of Teverelix LA on symptoms of BPH as previously reported. Further analysis of data is ongoing."

n_w_b
22/12/2006
07:41
No statistical significance figures cited this time - which were very strong
in the the first trial.Ok further analysis ongoing but I thought such figures very quickly established these days. I'd love to know whether this issue was queried in the analyst meeting. share price didn't fall on the day,though, so hopefully
my concerns are unjustified

gnomet2
21/12/2006
20:55
Why?,they were good with the same results as the previous trial.

"Teverelix LA, administered as a single subcutaneous injection, demonstrated symptomatic improvement from as early as week two and the duration of the effect appears to be in the order of 8 weeks based upon a preliminary analysis of the relevant clinical endpoint, the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS).

The study was a Phase II, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study investigating the effects and safety of two different

n_w_b
21/12/2006
20:33
I'm actually a bit disappointed at the trial results- not as good as the previous ones and a fair old sample size for a phase2. Can anyone cheer me up on that front?
gnomet2
21/12/2006
19:23
Thanks, just us three here. :-(
n_w_b
21/12/2006
18:46
Thanks for that info both of you.
gnomet2
Chat Pages: Latest  16  15  14  13  12  11  10  9  8  7  6  5  Older

Your Recent History