Ariana Resources Share Discussion Threads

[davidspringbank] 20/12/2019 12:51

Good drilling results.

[shortarm] 20/12/2019 12:33

What's gone wrong!??Why has this gone blue????Lol!

[plasybryn] 20/12/2019 12:14

Listen to the second half. Very positive for gold.Https://www.rt.com/shows/keiser-report/476184-central-banks-push-gold-higher/

[plasybryn] 20/12/2019 10:58

Some more great posts on LSE by Strangerstill. Sums it up beautifully.

[thanksamillion] 20/12/2019 10:35

Diversifying the political/regional/product risk by monitising half of the Turkish operation and using part of the cash to kick the Cypriot/Copper/gold operation into life is a big positive to me. Not saying the said risk is reduced but at least it is split between Turkey/Cyprus and Gold/Copper.

Copper by the way, has done exceedingly well since the deal was reported and generally speaking its share price goes counter to golds so they should balance each other off to some extent as the business develops.

[erro] 20/12/2019 07:55

What a great report. I think the fact that it is a three way JV is perfect as it keeps everyone in check. Looking forward to a very good 2020 for Ariana investors!

[theduke420] 19/12/2019 17:04

Ariana Resources: MiningMaven Report on Salinbas investigates the project and its potential for investors - https://mailchi.mp/c1b695546777/miningmaven-report

[theduke420] 19/12/2019 16:28

New MiningMaven report on AAU available on AAU websitehttps://arianaresources.com/media-menu/reports

[bigglesbingham] 19/12/2019 11:53

I will make sure I know all answers before I vote

[sonoftherock] 19/12/2019 11:50

I agree completely with the MoU comments. It's why I greeted the initial announcement as promising. I was genuinely surprised when the price spiked (wasn't complaining though). Personally I think it's best to step back for a while and let the company do the necessary. This way, if and when we do receive details of a firm agreement, then there should be a proper lift in the share price? One that can be sustained (I hope). There doesn't seem too much point in trying to debate details when there are none. Happy New Year to all when it comes!

[jc2706] 19/12/2019 10:47

CC,

Frameworks and terms can be pretty loose!

[plasybryn] 19/12/2019 10:06

Agreed subject to shareholder approval of course.

[charles clore] 19/12/2019 09:44

If the framework is agreed then it's only the terms that have to be agreed.

[dixi] 19/12/2019 09:20

'The framework is agreed', if the MoU comes to pass it seems fair to assume that the details will not drastically change, assuming this goes ahead. So it seems reasonable that it is creating debate. If it does proceed I do not necessarily think it means we will see answers to questions currently being asked.

[ironstorm] 19/12/2019 08:13

It is impossible at the moment to see the shape of the deal. I fear the mining maven muddied the waters somewhat. As it does. It really take into consideration the RNS details properly but brings some of it into their article. Perhaps it was finished after the Xmas party.

I am happy to sit on my hands in the belief that payday is moving towards me.

[bigglesbingham] 19/12/2019 08:07

My point exactly but you put it more eloquently JC

[jc2706] 19/12/2019 07:22

I am somewhat confused by the discussion here. A MoU is, by definition, incomplete. It is a statement of intent but by no means conclusive. Whilst the framework is agreed the details will need to be clarified and it does not mean that any deal will be done (as many fall apart as succeed in my experience).

[bigglesbingham] 18/12/2019 19:19

I had a chat with Michael, he has had experience of a similar situation which they decided to keep to themselves until all info was divulged. Information leaked out as it invariably does and it had a bad effect on the shareprice ( don't believe that deal went through). With his previous experience in mind He told me they'd made a calculated judgement to go to market and explain what their intentions are subject to due diligence. I respect them for their decision. It has pros and cons but ultimately I believe it's had a positive impact on shareprice up over 10% since announcement and we know their thinking. Everyone likes detail I would argue me more than most but until we get final detail and DD we have to be patient. Sorry if I come across as preaching it's not my intention I'm just trying to state facts as I see them.

[8rad] 18/12/2019 18:36

Dixi….welcome aboard the good ship Muddling. In Kerim's last interview he was not willing to divulge either Greek or Turk.

[dixi] 18/12/2019 18:19

Hi bigglesbingham, I'm not especially against the MoU proposal. My point is that the MoU seems to have raised more questions than answers amongst investors (me included), causing uncertainty, the report appears to not address that issue. I guess that is inevitable but frustrating. Investors are clearly selling based on what is 'known', that is depressing the share price in my opinion.

[bigglesbingham] 18/12/2019 17:51

It very high level plas it is getting a revenue stream. It should be seen as a document which raises awareness for people to then do research , look at rnss about MOU. It's clearly not meant as a definitive contract agreement!!

[bigglesbingham] 18/12/2019 17:48

Perhaps to raise interest???? The principles are known. Would you rather nothing is said whatsoever? Many on this board would then be screaming why so quiet.

[dixi] 18/12/2019 17:04

Just further lack of clarity once the given information is picked over - it is said on here we cannot be told more because the information is not out there yet - so why commission (presumably) a report that does not have all the details yet either?

[plasybryn] 18/12/2019 16:50

Well the Report says it gets a steady revenue stream from the JV and this will obviously reduce once our share is diluted, so I think the report could have made this comment, but choose not too. Just wondering!!

[bigglesbingham] 18/12/2019 16:34

This is the further $8m to increase their stake to 53%