We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Register for Free to get streaming real-time quotes, interactive charts, live options flow, and more.
| Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Stock Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ariana Resources Plc | AAU | London | Ordinary Share |
| Price Change | Price Change % | Share Price | Last Trade
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.075 | 4.00% | 1.95 | 15:18:05 |
| Open Price | Low Price | High Price | Close Price | Previous Close |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1.875 | 1.875 | 1.95 | 1.95 | 1.875 |
| Industry Sector |
|---|
| MINING |
| Announcement Date | Type | Currency | Dividend Amount | Ex Date | Record Date | Payment Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 20/07/2021 | Special | GBP | 0.00175 | 18/08/2022 | 19/08/2022 | 03/10/2022 |
| 20/07/2021 | Special | GBP | 0.00175 | 03/03/2022 | 04/03/2022 | 25/03/2022 |
| 20/07/2021 | Special | GBP | 0.0035 | 26/08/2021 | 27/08/2021 | 24/09/2021 |
| Top Posts |
|---|
Posted at 29/1/2025 08:14 by kaos3 if a "cheap" leading world miner used to discounts and offers buys in at 2,3p - i am ok with adding some for a quick buckbut most disagree due to the management history i assume. even above fact is not enough. like pope sealing it - is not enough in aau case and newmont is after aau - they did not buy into kosovo. small but important detail ... (like telling the most beautiful young lady how much i like her umbrella and how interested i am in the field of umbrellas) telling us what could come as the end game soon. they did push asx listing away when they need lots of cash. share price dropped etc ... theories are my hobby |
Posted at 24/1/2025 11:46 by konil i am almost sure that ks will not drive the company into the ground (no pun intended) with equity financing at these share price levels, whether through asx listing and/or other share issues.so asx listing will have to be delayed. we will hopefully hear about monies (dividend) being remitted to aau by zenit and may see some debt financing. if there is asx listing at these levels then share price will inevitably head even lower maybe to sub 1p. none of this will set pulses racing and share price likely to languish for some time to come. meanwhile the turkey operations ex-salinbas are in rude health and once tavsan fully operational, aau is likely to see production at 40k to 50k including kiz output, so aau receipts (23.5%) from zenit after costs could be c.$25m p.a. but this is unlikely to continue for long as kiz will probably start tailing off after another year or two. (if kiz did not tail off and aau receipts continued at this level, could dokwe be funded, at least in the main, all the way to production over say 5 to 8 years from organic funds? improbable but just a thought.) with much drilling already completed at dokwe and mre in excess of 1.8m ozs nonetheless it seems aau are some way from preparing a bfs, preferring instead to continue drilling to expand the mre and improving the mine plan along the way. this leads me to think ks wants to prepare the ground (again no pun intended) for an approach to/from newmont or some other jv partner. if this does happen we could see aau monetise some part of dokwe in a year or two. in context of dokwe size cf. aau size, this could be a multi-bagging event. perhaps just wishful thinking. |
Posted at 22/1/2025 18:35 by konil aau needs to get a ceo to navigate the forthcoming financing/jv requirements but ks's ego will not allow it. a second best would be a board level financial director.if ks continues to rely on external financial advisers/brokers who operate on fees and bonuses he will continue to get advice which may not be (and often is not) in the company's best interests. experience as a world class geologist does not qualify him to judge what is and is not sound advice where financing and commercial agreements are concerned but his ego may prevent him realising that. credit to him for bringing aau this far but a really wise manager would realise its time to bring on board mental muscle for areas that are not his strengths and who are truly aligned with the company's interests and not rely on external advisers. until evidence to the contrary i doubt this will happen and the likelihood is the bulk of the spoils will go to others, not the current shareholders. i will be delighted to be wrong on this. |
Posted at 15/1/2025 15:22 by kaos3 aau imho is coming into buying rangei am of the opinion that with no II, disillusioned big PIs (of age), big shareholders fraternity group (MDV,new Rockover shareholder, KM and few from this BB) - superb undeveloped resources AAU can be taken over for small money (considering the input price of the fraternity shareholders). I hope to buy a few in the coming period and hope and pray for a cheap TO. Leopard, OZ; Dokwe (when the political situation clears up) just need professional corporate development energy and resources - which present AAU can not deliver and is also unvilling (their model is to let someone else build the operating mine and so they will always be in minority, not controlling their own destiny, their cash flow for the further expansion and even dividends will always depend on someone else - they will be always depending due to the declared stategy) also MDV and KS are under the deserved pressure and I think their personalities are quite, working, leave me alone. so if they get a good offer - they will take the golden handshake. on the personal level i like them both btw |
Posted at 02/1/2025 17:45 by jaynesdad trevorNot sure when the calculation of 'this boards' holding was done, but I would be surprised if it was as high as 30% after the Rockover takeover. This takeover was used using AAU paper, meaning heavy dilution. From memory the Rockover shareholders ended up with over a third of the enlarged AAU. Which of course includes AAUs Turkish assets and the early stage stuff elsewhere. There has to be a suspicion that the 'original' AAU Board had the wool pulled over their eyes during the DD process. There are agreements for Zimbabwean free carry already in place with Tharisa around a year ago (?) plus thoughts that the Rockover Directors were possibly/ probably aware this was coming due to their Zimbabwe connections where they have lived many years. Therefore they sought to capitalise on Dokwe before the Zimbabwe action became common knowledge by getting into bed with Arianas pool of non Zimbabwe assets. This is of course supposition and we don't know how much or how little is true but it does point to yet more incompetence within AAU hence the malaise in the share price With this roadblock at Dokwe its hard to see much progress this year or longer until there is clarity on what is supposed to be AAUs major asset. |
Posted at 11/12/2024 09:19 by kaos3 i am expecting news from kazakhstan - AAU will be getting new huge promising resource next year bought from their billionaire. AAU has long standing historical presence in Kazakhstan via its Asgard fund and is familiar with the local geology and business environment. AAU will buy holding Co based in BVI. very promising historic data. shot by the russians and newmont in the 60s.the best ever land block multi poly metallic with significant silver and gold veins being observed. land block will be accuiered by issuing 35 % new AAU shares. there is a plan to list on the local share exchange. all imho kaos3 ;) |
Posted at 27/11/2024 07:40 by plasybryn Am i right that Mentor Demi is attending the Mines & Money as the CEO of WTR in an official capacity whilst his parent Co AAU hid away in a hotel room next door. What is Kerim and the AAU Board like! Well done Mentor. Your boss is an embarrassment. The AAU presentation should be held within the Conference using one of the allocated rooms imo. Is anyone intending on going to this farce. |
Posted at 29/10/2024 12:16 by konil trying to fathom aau's holding in panther metals.does aau have 5.5% direct holding and a further 3.1% via aau's asgard metals fund, total aau holding 8.6% of panther metals? or is that double counted? anyone know the true holding aau have in panther metals? |
Posted at 27/10/2024 06:00 by kaos3 ot1. putinaire is a blessing ... he posts there, where i find value 2. i do not invest any more eg add in a juniors, despite value until the feb 2025 - due to geopolitical 3. interesting that the bet buying pure metal and then recycle it back into miners is proving right 4. i am having miniscule stakes in several small value miners ,,,, so i can recite them in the middle of the night to strike when the time comes to sell the metal for shares - including aau 5. i find investing into natural resources companies which are profitable of PE up to 5 atm with huge cash reserves most deserving. why - because they are able, cheap, dividend paying and above all - they are most able to put surplus cash to work when ,not if, the crisis strikes - much better then myself AAU - for me the jury is still out ... superb value, that is for sure. but lol - capital increase risk?, cheap buy out, BOD structure, non being able to guide their own cash flow from the only producing mine, doing their geo work for almost free (paid in shares sometimes, but their revenue is almost zero - how responsible is that?) and all the rest but it could become a huge success imho. depending how determined the big shareholders will act. without them taking position - it will be more of the same. i am being slightly negative regarding the presend situation as you know already (i did shut up) - but most importantly - the new biggest shareholder is an unknown to me - so i am waiting and observing. if i would be a big shareholder - i would orginise a drinking or cigar meeting of a few big ticket boys - and try to determine the disciplined future for the AAU. Showing the present structure THERE IS SOMEONE THEY ARE RESPONSIBLE TO EVERY DAY. if boys would not come - that would be a telling sign hint hint but luckily i am just a poor jester slovenian gardener all imho stoopid opinion i hope this post will not trigger anyone - because it is just delusional |
Posted at 11/9/2024 13:33 by jaynesdad I agree with a lot of that jaf.Sener himself has backtracked in recent interviews about post Tavsan dividends. Now there are logical reasons for that 1) AAU isn't that flush with cash for working capital, bearing mind it has to eke out the dwindling cash position it still retains from the Ozaltin deal. AAU no longer controls any productive asset whatsoever that currently provides a cash flow. 2)AAU, even in concert with Proccea, is outvoted in the Zenit JV. AAU (and Proccea) will only received dividends from Zenit if Ozaltin agrees. If Ozaltin decides to divert surplus JV funds solely to development of other assets held by the JV then AAU is in no position to force the issue. 3) The enlarged AAU is spending money in Zimbabwe. What happens if AAU runs out of working capital? Even if it is allowed a dividend from the current JV why would they then restrict their working capital by giving its shareholders dividends? In other words what business sense is there in distributing dividends and then having to borrow from the market at current interest rates? My working assumption at the moment is that there will not be dividends paid to AAU shareholders for several years, even though Sener keeps claiming that AAU is dividend paying. In fact it would be poor management for AAU to pay them as it could well mean taking on debt at the company level to provide working capital. |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions
Hot Features
Premium
