Aminex Share Discussion Threads

[dunderheed] 29/3/2018 11:42

CP not bad news at all.
I was (effectively) offered a nice job by coincidence the next day as it was something I could do with my eyes closed.
However I am going to resist and go for something I enjoy which really is something I should have done on last redundancy round, as if I do not do it this time, I never will!!
Life flies by too quickly!!

[cperkin] 29/3/2018 11:27

Standard accounting format though dunder m8 ;)

Anyway sorry to hear the bad news, hope it all works out for you.

[dunderheed] 29/3/2018 11:18

Huh lol what?!?!
We've been over this one matey this is subjective to the economist who puts this together!

[cperkin] 29/3/2018 11:13

A Fully risked NAV is a fully risked NAV...

[dunderheed] 29/3/2018 10:56

Mate not an issue at all. I will be 'semi retiring', really looking forward to it.
My finance life good, my personal life pooh (but it always is lol)!

[blackgold00] 29/3/2018 10:50

sorry to hear that Dunder

[dunderheed] 29/3/2018 10:47

Omg look I promised not to post over there until rns issued and because I wasted half a bloody day arguing with people over something I bloody dont care about anyway lol.!!
I've just been made redunders lately so have way way too much time on my hands lol!

[blackgold00] 29/3/2018 10:44

Dunder, post what you did over on lse, I dare you, they will probably elucidate better than me : )

[dunderheed] 29/3/2018 10:44

Yes but I'm not seeing it mate?
There are no issues for zub to farm in low ball?
Can you elucidate dear chap?

[blackgold00] 29/3/2018 10:40

there must be a point there some where Dunder

[dunderheed] 29/3/2018 10:17

Bg and your point is?

[blackgold00] 29/3/2018 10:16

"Any farm-out would be subject to Tanzanian Government, shareholder and certain other approvals."

[slepy] 29/3/2018 10:12

Oh god. Another takeover rumour.
Agree with dunderheed. If anything, Zubair will low ball us sooner or later.

[dunderheed] 29/3/2018 10:01

Share price is holding up well again I see? Funny when in 'play'.
I've got a 'theory' on this which to be honest, whilst far fetched, isn't anymore so than some of the valuations I've seen mooted around?
Did the zubs come along, see relatively good assets and a 'mgt' team completely out of their depth (laughingly so?).
They engage with said management supporting them and buying up a significant strategic investment which allows them to put eyes and ears on board.
Then let the 'mgt' continue, as was before, with messages of support however without actually pony'ing up money.
They keep good eyes on the assets knowing Jay et al simply don't have the 'know how' to efficiently progress, then can start to snap up the assets as cheaply as taking over the company on the cheap, simply because no other operators are willing to let this motley crue operate and zub will support the mgt whispering in their ears "don't worry give us some direct equity in the assets cheaply and you guys can operate because we all know the 'true value' that the market has missed and this is the best way of crystallising this"!!
Massaging the egos of management whilst taking over by stealth eventually helping every one by a low ball offer when the 'mgt' have mucked things up again.
I laugh when I'm questioned over on lse about a low ball farm in offer as this has to take into account the risks of possible additional further costs post drill. Then people retort "why oh why, they only need one well to produce a gazillion mcf!!"
Just like kn1 eh lol!
I know all a bit mental conspiracy theory above but not that far fetched!!
Don't forget all imho and as always dyor of course!!
Best of luck all.

[cperkin] 29/3/2018 09:19

Current fully risked NAV must be around the $500 Million mark I would guess.

[cperkin] 28/3/2018 19:11

No worries dunder, maybe the brim of the hat is obscuring your view ;)

[dunderheed] 28/3/2018 19:03

Btw the way don't worry about my free bb hat.
I think that's very safe lol!

[dunderheed] 28/3/2018 19:02

Ah sorry I misread your post (again!).
I do seem to do that often don't I lol?!

[cperkin] 28/3/2018 18:55

Get over, not my style at all dunder. It was posted by another LSE poster on more than one LSE BB.

I take every ones comments with a pinch of salt myself and your hat may or may not be safe ;)

[dunderheed] 28/3/2018 18:47

Ah ok cp so it came from you?
If it came from 'Malcy' I'd take that with a very big dose of salt (ahem I'll get me hat!).

[dunderheed] 28/3/2018 18:45

Yes this is my point. I'd like to know where they originated from because they often get referred to?
They could be from a genuine.source but from what I think extremely unlikely, however to be clear, I have been known to have made a mistake once before!!

[cperkin] 28/3/2018 18:43

lol grey, it came from a poster who I have known for some time and has good city connections, no idea if their is any truth in it but when coupled with Malcy's comments and then the sudden RNS regarding the Zubairs, it is as plausible as any other theory I have seen touted.

[greyingsurfer] 28/3/2018 18:40

I can't be bothered to go over the LSE, so could someone fill me in on the "Statoil rumours" - are about to offer 10p a share? Which would explain why the share price is down today!

Peter

[cperkin] 28/3/2018 18:27

Caught tampering with the ball ron?

Multiple ID's from the same IP address there ron? Whoops.....Maybe ADVFN should check theirs as well....what do you think?

[stinkypeet] 28/3/2018 18:21

You won't be able to ronny boy will you, so crow away whereever else you wish. And frankly, return or not see if I give two hoots...

Good night ronny ;0)