Advanced Oncotherapy Share Discussion Threads

[johnjohntaylor] 05/9/2017 23:42

Is much of what you say the past? Looks good now and moved on from what seem like bad old days? Huge potential on target.

[johnjohntaylor] 05/9/2017 20:49

It's interesting to me that the people who seemed to be trying to drag down this company are now very quiet. The worm has turned?!

[mrtruth1] 05/9/2017 16:26

This is undeniably positive stuff!

[daijavu] 04/9/2017 15:55

mrtruth1.

There was a time that I shared your faith but the BoD opened my eyes. I now have a far more pragmatic view of the company and that has helped me significantly.

[mrtruth1] 04/9/2017 10:31

Proving again that things are fully on track, maybe faith not such a bad thing here. Glad I've stayed in.

[daijavu] 04/9/2017 08:45

Good news but still some way to go before I would put my cash in.

[wi1l] 04/9/2017 08:40

Saved by the bell!! News arrives to help things along.

[mrtruth1] 03/9/2017 23:54

It's holding because no one really knows! I remain confident and await news.

[wi1l] 03/9/2017 12:20

Mostly selling last week,but very little either way. Seems to be holding its own though -have a feeling this can only go down next week but by how much??

[johnjohntaylor] 26/8/2017 09:08

Mrtruth1, I'm holding, I see no real reason to sell, quite satisfied that Advanced are on top of developments etc. GLA

[andy] 26/8/2017 00:23

daijavu23 Aug '17 - 17:03 - 3858 of 3859 1 0


Correct, you can always buy in later, but in the meantime better to be out and waiting to reduce risk, IMO.

[mrtruth1] 24/8/2017 11:03

Any holders here?

[daijavu] 23/8/2017 17:03

It is better to be out wanting to be in than to be in wanting to be out.

[mrtruth1] 23/8/2017 13:01

Definitely interesting times. Kind of sink or swim stage by the looks of it?! Can I ask the holders here (apologies in advance to those that offends), how they are feeling? I'm still holding on as I imagine we will have to find out how financing will continue in September onwards. If it's a positive statement then I'd be gutted if I'd jumped ship! ATB.

[mrtruth1] 22/8/2017 09:29

I'm very happy holding here, just a waiting game, was always likely to be.

[daijavu] 18/8/2017 23:21

The share price is 0.7p in old money. At one time it peaked at 17p in old money. At one point there was even talk of it reaching 20p but that never happened. What happened instead was that AVO did a reverse split so that for every 25 shares a shareholder had they were replaced by just one share. At the same time the share price was supposed to jump to 25 times the value it was on before the split but that only happened momentarily before it dropped and never stopped dropping.

At 0.7p AVO should be a snip if it weren't for the fact that everything it owns is in hock and AVO is now controlled by a Swedish finance company.

The good news is that the finance company has spoken of the future benefits for shareholders if AVO does produce and sell LIGHT. Unfortunately, they did not say which shareholders.

I might buy AVO shares again but only if I can see that AVO has a future. Until then I am merely watching from the sidelines.

[mrtruth1] 17/8/2017 20:51

You're obsessed thinking I'm an "insider", lol, if you like I'll privately email you my holdings here to stop your questioning/accusations?! Happy to..

[andy] 17/8/2017 20:33

mrtruth,


Yes of course I have had replies from many companies over the years, and I do not view the fact that they reply as a reason to invest!


It is common courtesy for them to reply, and the reply they gave you was a standard reply, because they cannot tell you anything not already in the public domain!



"How do you know for sure that Junior office staff reply??"

I did not say that, please don't put words in my mouth. I actually said "The office junior probably attends to that task", which is entirely different.

You received a standard reply, unless they made you an insider. Did they make you an insider?

[johnjohntaylor] 17/8/2017 18:24

I'm here to learn about AVO and the potential gains to be had. I see people squabbling like children and people plugging other companies for investment!

Back to Advanced. If the funding is to dry up then news about further financing must be due by, say, the end of Sept??

[mrtruth1] 17/8/2017 18:16

Andy: have you had/experienced replies from them or other companies? How do you know for sure that Junior office staff reply?? Or just a presumption that applies across the board?

[mrtruth1] 17/8/2017 18:05

I get personal responses from several people (all of whom are cc'd in). Believe what you will. I'm satisfied by the replies I get.

[andy] 17/8/2017 17:42

mrtruth,

That's ridiculous, it takes them seconds to cut and paste the reply, and common courtesy demands they reply to you. it's normal business practice!


The office junior probably attends to that task. it's a stadard response they probably issue many times a day.


The point is they told you nothing because they can't tell you anything!

[mrtruth1] 17/8/2017 16:50

No! My point is they could have ignored my emails entirely...

[andy] 17/8/2017 16:26

mrtruth,

You have completely missed the point, it's nothing to do with glasses being half empty, market regulations prohibit them from replying to you in any other way, so their reply is simply courtesy, and is totally meaningless.


The question is subjective anyway, so that what is fine to an employee (getting paid a salary by AVO from shareholder funds) may not be fine to a shareholder who has invested his funds at a higher price.


If you Google AIM market regulations, it gives you a feel for what a company can do and say to investors, and when.


And then you will realise they could not have responded to you in any other way.