ADVFN Logo ADVFN

We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.

Trending Now

Toplists

It looks like you aren't logged in.
Click the button below to log in and view your recent history.

Hot Features

Registration Strip Icon for alerts Register for real-time alerts, custom portfolio, and market movers

BHP - How vulnerable is it to commodity price falls?

Share On Facebook
share on Linkedin
Print

Yesterday’s Newsletter considered the optimistic scenario of a return to 2014 commodity price levels; but what about the downside of continued poor prices, or even a Chinese recession bringing on very poor prices, particularly for iron ore and copper?

The answer depends, in the short run, on the cost of delivering product to customers relative to the market price.

In the long run it also depends on the cost of BHP delivering to customers relative to the costs of competitors doing the same job (because the lowest cost producer will survive as others exit the industry)

Underlying EBITDA and EBIT on its main areas of mining

Year ended

30 June US$m

2016/17

first half x 2

2015/16 2014/15

2013/14

Petroleum EBITDA

4,000

3,658 7,201

9,826

Petroleum EBIT

720

-573

1,986

Copper EBITDA

3,488

2,619 5,205

6,127

Copper EBIT

1,828

1,042

3,353

Iron ore EBITDA

8,324

5,599 8,648

13,531

Iron ore EBIT

6,460

3,740

6,932

Coal EBITDA

4,022

635

1,242

1,258

Coal EBIT

3,256

-349

348

Iron Ore

The 2016/17 interim report estimates that unit cash costs of Western Australia iron ore, overwhelmingly the main source, are now expected to be less than US$15 per tonne.

In that half year to December 2016 iron ore EBITDA rose to $4,162m from $2,823m the year before. The impact of raised iron ore prices was $1,318m, productivity added $77m and changes in controllable costs saved $106m.

Considering breakeven cost which, on top of cash costs, includes royalties, freight, exploration costs, sustaining capital, depreciation and amortization, interest, and taxes, experts have noted that breakeven costs fell across the board for mining companies as the commodity downturn took hold, e.g.

“Citi estimates that Rio Tinto had the lowest break-even point in 2013 at $US55.50 a tonne while Fortescue had the highest at $US84 a tonne. While the rankings have remained the same, the gap between Rio and Fortescue has narrowed substantially, with the miners’ break-evens put at $US29.80 and $US35.90 respectively.” Business Insider Australia, David Scutt, June 7th 2016

The chart shows that the lowest cost producers are Rio and BHP, at below $30 per tonne for Cost and Freight, CFR. Market prices are in the region of $72, so that gives a reasonable margin of safety. Furthermore, if prices did fall below, say, $32 a number of competitors will stop mining because they will not cover their variable costs.   This will reduce supply and at least stabilise prices, if not raise them.

Also, experts think that the big three miners, Rio, BHP and Vale, which are all projecting volume growth, could lower unit cash costs in the future especially relative to the smaller producers due to……………………….To read the rest of this article, and more like it, subscribe to my premium newsletter Deep Value Shares – click here http://newsletters.advfn.com/deepvalueshares/subscribe-1

CLICK HERE TO REGISTER FOR FREE ON ADVFN, the world's leading stocks and shares information website, provides the private investor with all the latest high-tech trading tools and includes live price data streaming, stock quotes and the option to access 'Level 2' data on all of the world's key exchanges (LSE, NYSE, NASDAQ, Euronext etc).

This area of the ADVFN.com site is for independent financial commentary. These blogs are provided by independent authors via a common carrier platform and do not represent the opinions of ADVFN Plc. ADVFN Plc does not monitor, approve, endorse or exert editorial control over these articles and does not therefore accept responsibility for or make any warranties in connection with or recommend that you or any third party rely on such information. The information available at ADVFN.com is for your general information and use and is not intended to address your particular requirements. In particular, the information does not constitute any form of advice or recommendation by ADVFN.COM and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any investment decisions. Authors may or may not have positions in stocks that they are discussing but it should be considered very likely that their opinions are aligned with their trading and that they hold positions in companies, forex, commodities and other instruments they discuss.

Leave A Reply

 
Do you want to write for our Newspaper? Get in touch: newspaper@advfn.com