ADVFN Logo ADVFN

We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.

Trending Now

Toplists

It looks like you aren't logged in.
Click the button below to log in and view your recent history.

Hot Features

Registration Strip Icon for discussion Register to chat with like-minded investors on our interactive forums.

Stanley Gibbons – is it an investment risk I can take?

Share On Facebook
share on Linkedin
Print

The calculated net current asset value, NCAV, of Stanley Gibbons (LSE:SGI) is one-quarter larger than its MCap. However, the NCAV numbers relate to September 2015, and there are many negatives in the current outlook. But do the positives outweigh them? I’ll list the main points here and make a decision on whether to invest.

©

Negative factors at play
1.Experts gone

It has lost a number of key experts with vital contacts and reputations, particularly in the antiques businesses.

2. Neglected stamp collectors

It has not supported the stamp collecting community or promoted its services as well as it should. Has it lost the bulk of its previous goodwill and loyalty?

3. Hidden losses.

The auditors have insisted on the accounts being re-calculated resulting in a mark-down of net assets (the directors overstated prior year numbers). But in yesterday’s announcement the directors choose not to quantify the loss. Why? Perhaps this is so big that they want to delay the shock that it will cause. The mere fact that they choose not to share such vital information with shareholders is a large negative in my view. Once these accounting adjustments are made the NCAV could fall below the MCap.

4. Inexperienced directors

The new senior team have a great deal of general business experience, but little of that is specific to collectibles.

5.Stamp and coin inventory value doubts

Could it be that the market prices have been artificially inflated by Stanley Gibbons themselves because they can influence them?

6. Borrowings

It still has bank debt of £16m and other liabilities – could that debt sink it?

7. Dominant shareholders

Is it possible they could run this company in their interests exclusively, to the detriment of small shareholders? Their reputations are not so high that we should be completely relaxed on this point. More time for evidence of their integrity regarding the interests of all shareholders is needed – this will take time.

Positive factors at play
1.NCAV is apparently one-quarter larger than MCap.

This is after devaluing inventories by one-third and receivables by one-fifth – these deductions provide some shock-absorbency for the forthcoming announcement on accounting adjustments.

2. Many of the brands are still strong in the minds of collectors, e.g. Stanley Gibbons in stamps and Baldwins in coins.

Catalogue brand is strong. Valuation expertise and integrity remains (I think). Availability of a wide-ranging stock is a pull factor for collectors. SGI retain……………………..To read the rest of this article, and more like it, subscribe to my premium newsletter Deep Value Shares – click here http://newsletters.advfn.com/deepvalueshares/subscribe-1

CLICK HERE TO REGISTER FOR FREE ON ADVFN, the world's leading stocks and shares information website, provides the private investor with all the latest high-tech trading tools and includes live price data streaming, stock quotes and the option to access 'Level 2' data on all of the world's key exchanges (LSE, NYSE, NASDAQ, Euronext etc).

This area of the ADVFN.com site is for independent financial commentary. These blogs are provided by independent authors via a common carrier platform and do not represent the opinions of ADVFN Plc. ADVFN Plc does not monitor, approve, endorse or exert editorial control over these articles and does not therefore accept responsibility for or make any warranties in connection with or recommend that you or any third party rely on such information. The information available at ADVFN.com is for your general information and use and is not intended to address your particular requirements. In particular, the information does not constitute any form of advice or recommendation by ADVFN.COM and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any investment decisions. Authors may or may not have positions in stocks that they are discussing but it should be considered very likely that their opinions are aligned with their trading and that they hold positions in companies, forex, commodities and other instruments they discuss.

Leave A Reply

 
Do you want to write for our Newspaper? Get in touch: newspaper@advfn.com