Share Name Share Symbol Market Type Share ISIN Share Description
Papillon Hldgs LSE:PPHP London Ordinary Share GB00BYZC5R04 ORD GBP0.001
  Price Change % Change Share Price Bid Price Offer Price High Price Low Price Open Price Shares Traded Last Trade
  +0.00p +0.00% 1.325p 0.00p 0.00p - - - 0.00 05:00:10
Industry Sector Turnover (m) Profit (m) EPS - Basic PE Ratio Market Cap (m)
General Financial - - - - 1.09

Papillon Hldgs Share Discussion Threads

Showing 26 to 45 of 50 messages
Chat Pages: 2  1
DateSubjectAuthorDiscuss
03/2/2017
13:56
Just in case anyone is stupid enough to think of investing in this. The quest corp ( acting on behalf of Neil Riches and all the poor fools who believed in him are now being sued by the defendants for their lawyers fees. It's all going off now! They are suing us for their attorney fees as an "exceptional case". Attorney fees for all Defendants for this to date will be a small fortune. Many hundreds of thousands, possibly higher. "Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 285 and FED. R. CIV. P. 54(d), Defendants Bloomberg L.P. and Bloomberg Finance L.P.; Interactive Data Corporation; and The Charles Schwab Corp. and Charles Schwab & Co., Inc. (collectively, “Defendants221;) hereby move for a declaration that this is an exceptional case and for an award of attorneys’ fees against Plaintiff." They also state: "I hereby certify that a reasonable effort has been made to reach agreement with Plaintiff’s counsel on the matters set forth in the motion and that we have not been able to reach agreement." So we have more interesting times ahead. On the appeal, my understanding is we cannot present new evidence but have to show the Judge did not take account of specific existing evidence in his summary decision and that a matter of material uncertainty remains and a trial is therefore still required. Honestly, having read everything from both sides throughout the case, I think our chances of success are minimal to zero. Even if we are successful, it has no bearing on the case except we get to a trial to face the non-infringement argument as well as the arguments they have not needed yet for prior art, invalidity etc. At least it will be interesting for us to follow! Maybe the the appeal might be there to pre-empt the attorney fee case. If Quest lose that it would ruin them surely although it is irrelevant to us here. Perhaps it is "you drop your attorney fee case, we drop our appeal, we all walk away." Go to previous 5605 Jump to the specified articleSubmit
cromarty
31/1/2017
10:55
Judge Gregory M. Sleet, recently granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment of non-infringement based on upon the Court’s construction of the limitation “changing [price] information.” Quest Licensing Corporation v. Bloomberg L.P., No. 14-561-GMS (D. Del. Jan. 19, 2017). Defendants argued that summary judgment was appropriate because “defendants217; accused systems do not receive or supply ‘only data that has changed’ as required by all of the asserted claims of the patent-in-suit.̶1; Id. at 3. Judge Sleet agreed. The Court previously construed the term “changing information” to mean “only [price] data that has changed,” and it was undisputed that the accused systems receive and supply information that “always includes non-changing information such as the stock symbol.” Id. at 5-6. Judge Sleet was not persuaded that the Court should revisit its claim construction ruling. Id. at 6. Quest Licensing Corporation v. Bloomberg L.P., No. 14-561-GMS
cromarty
28/1/2017
10:22
Quest Loses IP Suit Over Real-Time Mobile Stock Updates By Melissa Daniels Law360, Los Angeles (January 23, 2017, 10:16 PM EST) -- Bloomberg LP, Charles Schwab & Co. Inc. and others beat back patent infringement claims from Quest Licensing Corp. in Delaware federal court on Thursday when a judge ruled their real-time stock market updates on programs like Bloomberg Anywhere don’t infringe Quest’s patent for an information exchange method. The order from U.S. District Judge Gregory Sleet arrives after nearly three years of an intellectual property row that began with multiple cases and was consolidated into one over Quest’s patent directed toward a method for supplying real-time information...
cromarty
22/1/2017
12:06
Absolutely JK. Although I understand the CEO is to step down after he has filled his pockets with the proceeds of the latest float. I am quite certain a lot of the debts on MCB's balance sheet will be owed to him.
cromarty
21/1/2017
11:39
There was no reason to invest before - who on earth wants a CEO who has a track record of rewarding himself at the expense of shareholders? That's a slam dunk red flag reason to run a mile!
jaknife
26/12/2016
11:17
PS Absolutely nothing posted about NR is childish gossip. Only fact that can all be proven.
cromarty
26/12/2016
11:16
Happy Christmas. Got your message but will never stop attempting to stop NR from profiting from another scam float. Which he will if it succeeds. I am well aware NR is to step aside but he will still be the major shareholder.
cromarty
25/12/2016
12:03
Just to clarify I don't work for anyone and if you have read my first post properly I mentioned about neil riches should step aside !!!!!!! I certainly wouldn't dare to be arrogant enough to have more knowledge than a keyboard warrior like your self and probably being a disgruntled worldlink shareholder who if he thinks his shares are worth nothing then I suggest he donates them to charity ? so let's concentrate efforts and not throw childish gossip and rumour around and concentrate on try getting the company to work and hopefully with a NEW BOARD !!! Got the message this time ? :)
speculator15
24/12/2016
11:53
e shall see cromarty21 Dec '16 - 05:49 - 5577 of 5586 2 0 Edit Warwick your comments in 2013 were correct and they are still NR is a conman. I have known him for over 20 years. The sooner everyone realises this the sooner he will sink to the true level of his abilities and intellect. 4laffalot21 Dec '16 - 22:23 - 5578 of 5586 1 0 dont often beleive what the Sun says but on this occasion they are spot on ...hxxps://www.thesun.co.uk/sport/1611113/sam-allardyce-drops-footie-betting-job-and-ditches-shares-after-sun-probe-finds-boss-lost-investors-4m/ Warwick you numpty do you think that Myclubbetting can pass any kind of due diligence when its run by Neil Riches, a couple of oldies and his wife who goes by the name of "dizzy" and officially billed as "Superwoman" and whose profile says "Working Mum, nearly all grown up kids. Trying to stop my brain going completely to mush, so am now assisting the Hubs in the business. My experience is varied. Bit scatty and disorganised at times, in-dispersed with moments of genius and clarity! lol . Ladbrokes must be papping themselves at this slick new betting operation..... "Where do i invest"? said nobody ever....
cromarty
24/12/2016
11:52
I certainly know more than you about MCB unless you are part of the marketing team for NR's latest scam
cromarty
24/12/2016
11:09
Wow , Educated ! If you feel that strongly then sell you shares ? Or don't by any ! obviously you know more than the other 5 people on the chat page :) happy xmas
speculator15
24/12/2016
10:17
This doesn't look good. Update on Pacer. Trial cancelled and seems to say the Judge has granted their motion. This is exactly what it says: "Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Gregory M. Sleet - Final Pretrial Conference held on 12/19/2016. Oral arguments on the pending motion for summary judgment (193 ). The Court will grant the motion and issue a written opinion in due course. The Jury Trial is removed from the Court's calendar. (Court Reporter Kevin Maurer.) (mdb
cromarty
24/12/2016
10:16
https://beta.companieshouse.gov.uk/company/06448562/filing-history
cromarty
24/12/2016
10:08
The Pacer case in the US has been effectively LOST so hardly a distraction, just another reason not to invest.
cromarty
24/12/2016
10:00
Educated??????? This is a crock of sh.....t
cromarty
21/12/2016
05:52
MyClub betting have now lost their court case in the US. The company is worthless. When you get the prospectus look out for the debt, it will be money owed to Directors. Within weeks they will pay themselves back with your money. DO NOT INVEST IN THIS
cromarty
20/12/2016
12:36
This doesn't look good. Update on Pacer. Trial cancelled and seems to say the Judge has granted their motion. This is exactly what it says: "Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Gregory M. Sleet - Final Pretrial Conference held on 12/19/2016. Oral arguments on the pending motion for summary judgment (193 ). The Court will grant the motion and issue a written opinion in due course. The Jury Trial is removed from the Court's calendar. (Court Reporter Kevin Maurer.) (mdb)" Not looking good for My Club in the court case in the US
cromarty
20/12/2016
07:58
£2.50, WOW! That would be amazing. Thanks Cromarty. What do you mean by "Guess this is the Sub-Standard list" ?
encarter
12/12/2016
11:32
Myclubbetting.com Limited is a reincarnation of Worldlink Group plc which listed on the Standard list (surprise) in late 2011 at a share price of £2.50 and was in liquidation a year later with over £4 million of debts and the shares suspended down at 8p. Its performance, however, clearly merited a bonus of over £1 million to its CEO, Neil Riches! Upon liquidation, the assets were acquired by the CEO and others for £180,000 plus a future potential revenue share and that company is now called Myclubetting.com. It enables local sports clubs to run betting services; however, this is a hugely competitive market. It was so when Worldlink went bust 4 years ago and is even more so now with recent consolidation in the online sports betting market. On the plus side, it has had some recent press as Sam Allardyce, one of its brand ambassadors, had to step down from the role on taking on the England manager role. I guess all publicity is good publicity, right? The recent abbreviated accounts of Myclubbetting.com Limited for the year to 30 April 2015 show losses to date of £2.7 million. I am interested to see more up-to-date financial information in the forthcoming prospectus but would be very surprised if the business is profitable at the moment or will be in the near-term. By now, Papillion will have less than £700,000 in cash and once costs of the RTO are taken into account, it is highly likely that it will need to raise further funds to fund Myclubbetting.com. I can’t fathom why third parties will provide additional funding for a business and a management team that took a very similar business into liquidation a few years ago. Guess this is the Sub-Standard List though so anything is possible. I feel for the shareholders locked in here as I reckon the share price is only going one way, as and when it comes out of suspension. I’ll review further once the prospectus comes out with a more definitive view on the RTO. - See more at: hxxp://www.shareprophets.com/views/23633/papillon-holdings-a-shocking-deal-even-by-the-sub-standard-shockers-xi-standards#sthash.IFE8eVHR.dpuf
cromarty
03/12/2016
10:36
Bad news from the My club law suit in the USA Several documents just appeared on the Court PACER system. They have just formally submitted their motion for Summary Judgement for Non-Infringement for all the accused systems. “….(collectively, “Defendants221;) hereby move for summary judgment of non-infringement pursuant to the Court’s Order granting permission to file a motion for summary judgment of non-infringement based on the “changing information” limitation which requires that the accused systems receive and supply “only data that has changed.” It includes a 21 page opening brief which sadly seems to be a rather compelling argument as the key points all hang off the precise definition and reasoning set by the Court itself in the Order Construing Terms. Quest are going to need to pull a rabbit out of the hat on this one. Answering brief due on 16th. Don't touch this with a bargepole
cromarty
Chat Pages: 2  1
Your Recent History
LSE
GKP
Gulf Keyst..
LSE
QPP
Quindell
FTSE
UKX
FTSE 100
LSE
IOF
Iofina
FX
GBPUSD
UK Sterlin..
Stocks you've viewed will appear in this box, letting you easily return to quotes you've seen previously.

Register now to create your own custom streaming stock watchlist.

By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions

P:35 V: D:20170227 18:20:55