We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Himalayan Fd | LSE:HYF | London | Ordinary Share | NL0000464154 | ORD EUR0.01 |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.00 | 0.00% | 35.50 | 0.00 | 01:00:00 |
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 0 | N/A | 0 |
TIDMHYF
RNS Number : 7406D
Himalayan Fund N.V.
02 May 2017
HIMALAYAN FUND N.V.
Extract of the Annual Report 2016
The complete version may be found on
http://www.himalayanfund.nl/annual-reports/
Chairman's Letter 2016
Dear Shareholders,
Two major geo-political surprises framed the performance of global equity markets in 2016. In June, British voters voted to leave the EU, wrong-footing professional investors and throwing markets into confusion. Then, in November, US voters decided they wanted a political outsider intent on disrupting the Washington status quo as President. This unleashed a surge in the value of the US Dollar, as well as US equity markets as investors bought into the idea of "Trump reflation" turbo charging US growth. These events provided the background for the MSCI All Countries World Index to add 5.3% for the year. The US contributed 9.2%, while Europe limited the Global advance by losing 3.4%. The Far East Index barely moved while Asian Emerging markets added 3.8%. Global Emerging markets gained 8.6% for the year, as investors tentatively recovered their risk appetites late in the year.
In India, following the previous year's outperformance, the Net Asset Value per share of your Fund fell by
$1.98 from $50.64 to $48.66 in 2016, a decrease of 3.9%. Our benchmark, the Nifty 50 Index in USD gained 0.6%, including a
2.6% depreciation of the Rupee against the US Dollar. I regret therefore to have to report
underperformance of the Fund by 4.5 percentage points relative to benchmark for the year.
Indian equity performance disappointed for the second year in succession in 2016 against a background of major geopolitical shocks, significant domestic reforms and the effects of global liquidity flows. The year opened with widespread concern about a hard landing in China and equity markets broadly in retreat. In the US, the Fed maintained a policy of conditioning markets to the prospect of removing extreme monetary stimulus with a progressive series of
rate increases. Meanwhile, commodity prices remained benign, moderating inflationary pressures and global economic growth improved slowly.
Donald J. Trump's unexpected victory in the US Presidential election brought uncertainty about economic policy but his "America first" rhetoric prompted a surge of optimism about everything American. The Dollar drew liquidity from all other currencies and the funds bought were poured into US equities. Again, we saw money being drained from emerging markets, as well as developed markets as investor enthusiasm drove the Dollar and US equities to record valuation levels by year-end.
Meanwhile, the domestic demand driven Indian economy enjoyed strong support from consumption and government expenditure. This supported GDP growth in the 7% plus range and enabled Indian equities to move steadily upwards through the middle two quarters. On the political front, the long-awaited tax reform brought by the adoption of nationwide GST finally got political approval. To some surprise, the incumbent governor of the Reserve Bank of India declined another term and left in September. Investors took the appointment of his successor to manage a reformed monetary policy framework which had been adopted by agreement with the government, as a positive. By this time, Indian equity markets had marked six months of steady upward progress and were ahead by nearly eight percent.
The year had not seen the last of turmoil though: the Indian government had one more reform move up its sleeve. Coinciding with Election Day in the US, the government announced the withdrawal of the 500 and 1,000 Rupee notes with a short timeframe for people to cash them in. These notes represented some 86% of the Rupee notes in circulation. The primary motivation was to curtail the black economy of which the cancelled notes were the mainstay. Also, the government wanted to boost the organised economy and non-cash transactions as well as "financialize" savings. Furthermore, Mr. Modi was determined to make a strike against corruption and money laundering: the cancelled notes were commonly used to buy votes in election campaigns. A new design of 5 00 Rupee note has been introduced as well as a new denomination of 2,000 Rupee note. Demonetization, as it was labelled, caused sharp revisions of growth expectations and uncertainty about companies' earnings prospects. GDP growth forecasts were cut to the low 6% range.
The effect of liquidity flows in 2016 is worthy of comment in an Indian context. Foreign investors were net sellers of
$3.2bn of Indian investments during the year: Early concerns about the Chinese economy drained equity markets of liquidity and brought a bear market in US equities in February. Emerging markets generally suffered liquidity outflows and India suffered a sharp sell-off. Then risk appetite returned, driving market momentum upwards towards mid-year.
The Brexit vote in the UK brought another wave of risk aversion and flight to safe haven investments. This time, Indian markets held their nerves and domestic appetite started to mop up foreign selling. Through the summer and into autumn, a favourable monsoon supported consumer demand and the enactment of GST legislation boosted investor sentiment. By autumn, Indian equities were nearly eight percent ahead for the year. The great liquidity drain caused by the US election brought heavy selling in India which was accentuated by demonetization. Share buying "on the dips" by domestic mutual funds provided a floor to some extent but the weight of selling in cash-orientated stocks brought a sharp retreat overall. It now appears that the sell-off was exaggerated and the evolution of a strong domestic source of liquidity in the equity markets is a significant development for the future.
Throughout 2016, we still held overweight positions in the Healthcare and Consumer Goods sectors. In Healthcare, we
took profits in Lupin and Torrent Pharma and diversified our exposure to the sector by adding Aurobindo Pharma late in the year.
Overall, we cut our exposure to the sector as it failed to meet our expectations. In Consumer Goods, we maintained our exposure at 22.8% of the portfolio but Agro Tech Foods, in particular, suffered in the aftermath of demonetization, losing 18% for the year. We reduced our Financial Sector exposure to just two holdings as asset
quality issues continue to dog the sector. We continue to steer clear of three sectors: Telecoms, where consolidation may prompt us
to look again this year, Metals and Mining, where we do not yet see a compelling reason to invest and
Transport, which may also deserve another look this year.
Some of our non-index stocks made the biggest contributions to returns in 2016. Indraprashtha Gas returned 70.2% and Heidelberg Cement 57.8%. Supreme Industries returned 30.6%, Shemaroo Entertainment 28.4% and VIP Industries 15.1%. Our best-performing index stock was HDFC Bank, which returned 14.7% for the year. We had an interest in twenty five stocks in total during the year, of which twelve generated positive returns and thirteen negative. On average, the portfolio held about twenty-one positions.
We continue to pursue our long-term strategic objective of generating outperformance by selecting stocks with visible earnings growth potential over the medium term, while demonstrating high governance standards. By year-end we had reduced our most concentrated positions to disperse risk more widely.
At the time of writing, investors may have decided that the Dollar and US equities have become severely overvalued and Emerging Markets have started to draw attention again. India has a number of reasons to deserve more than its fair share of liquidity. First, the government has stabilized its reputation with a sustained commitment to fiscal consolidation. Second, it has burnished its reputation for reform with the introduction of nationwide GST as well as demonetization, which is showing signs of achieving the objective of increasing the size of the organized economy. Third, competition surrounding the introduction of 4G internet services looks like accelerating the spread of high-speed internet services; there are more than one billion mobile connections in India. Fourth, the take- up of biometric ID cards to almost all adult Indians and the linking of hundreds of millions of accounts provide an efficient basis for the rollout of social services and underpin consumer demand. Fifth, the boost to the organised economy from demonetization will reinforce the financialization of savings and underpin equity markets with sustained growth in domestic liquidity. We
believe that against such a background the return prospects for Indian equities are excellent.
Once again, I thank our long-standing shareholders for their continued commitment and our friends and associates at Indasia Fund Advisors in Mumbai, whose support has again been invaluable. We continue to look for new promoters for the Fund and at the time of writing have discussions under way with a number of parties.
Ian McEvatt 11 April 2017
Directors' Report 2016
The Fund
In the Financial Year ended December 31st 2016, the Net Asset Value (NAV) per share of the Fund fell from $50.64 to
$48.66, a difference of -3.9%. The first Execution Day on NYSE Euronext Amsterdam in 2016 was January 4th, when the Transaction Price for the Fund's Ordinary Shares was $50.21; the last Execution Day was December 30th, when the transaction Price was $48.49. The difference of $1.72 represented a decline of 3.4%. Between the same two dates, the Nifty 50USD Index rose from 4062 to 4174, a difference of 2.8%. Thus the Transaction Price underperformed the Fund's performance benchmark by 6.2% in the holding period in question.
At the start of 2016, there were 207,748 Ordinary Shares of the Fund in the hands of shareholders. By the end of the year, the number had fallen to 162,323, a drop of 21.9%. In the face of volatile liquidity flows and performance in the Indian markets we experienced a steady flow of small redemptions through the year.
The Portfolio
We started the year with twenty-four holdings in the portfolio; the top ten holdings represented 68.3% of the portfolio and 49% of the total value was invested in stocks which are components of the Nifty Index. The largest sectoral concentrations were Financials, with 26.7% of the portfolio, Consumer Goods, with 20.9%, Healthcare with 14.7% and IT with 13.9%. We had no exposure to Metals and Mining, Telecom or Transportation stocks.
Portfolio turnover during the year was 18.2% as we held a total of 25 stocks for some period during the year and ended with 21 holdings. At year-end, our sectoral distribution was dominated by the same sectors, though the weightings reflected evolving strategy and the degree of relative performance. Consumer Goods comprised 22.8% of the portfolio, Financials 14.1%, IT 13.1% and Healthcare 11.9%. Our Auto Sector exposure appreciated to 6.4% and the Construction Sector to 10.1%. We built exposure to the Media sector with two holdings representing 4.5% of the portfolio.
At year-end, the top four holdings had an aggregate weight of 29.2% the largest holding being Pidilite Industries at 8.8%. There were 21 holdings; the top ten represented 59.8% of the portfolio and 37.6% of the portfolio comprised stocks which were components of the benchmark index.
The percentages were calculated based on the total Net Asset Value of the fund.
Administration
The legal structure of the Fund did not change in 2016. The Board is still in direct control of investment management through the Investment Committee, which is convened by the Chairman, who also acts as record-keeper. CACEIS Bank, Netherlands Branch continues as the Administrator and AIFMD Depository of the Fund and calculates the Net Asset Value on a weekly basis. Citiban k Mumbai is the local Custodian of the Fund. During the year under review and so far as The Board is aware, the Fund has effectively operated in conformity with the Administrative Organization and Internal Control procedures.
In 2016, The Board held four formal Board Meetings and conducted one Annual General Meeting.
The Investment Committee continued to receive research services from the Chairman of the Fund and from Indasia Fund Advisers Pte. Limited, of Mumbai. The Board is satisfied that it has the substance and procedures to carry out these responsibilities in a suitable manner and that the Fund's portfolio is consistent with the long-term investment objective.
The Board reviews the conduct of the administration of the Fund by the Administrator at regular management meetings. The Directors believe that the Administrator is capable of exercising the appropriate level of control over the operations of the Fund and has done so during the year under review.
Investment in Emerging Markets was subject to severe liquidity swings in 2016 and India suffered net outflows of foreign portfolio investment amounting to over $3 billions by comparison to inflows of more than $10bn the previous year. As a result, attempts at raising new money for the Fund were not successful.
The Directors continue to manage expenditure tightly though further significant cost reduction is difficult. The TER increased in 2016, substantially due to reduction in the value of total assets, the denominator in the calculation and in spite of tight expense control. We are actively working to generate new inflows to the Fund and believe that renewed prospects for attractive returns from investing in India will help with the effort. Any success in doing so will lead to a steady reduction in the TER.
Compliance
In preparation for each quarterly Board meeting, the Fund's Reporting Entity (Inviqta) prepared a checklist of compliance with corporate governance policy for the Oversight Entity (Mr. Dwight Makins) and the Board which was discussed during each Board meeting. There have been no breaches of the corporate governance policy during the year 2016.
The Fund is a long only equity fund and as such does not use leverage or derivatives in its portfolio. Thus the portfolio is exposed fully to the market price movements in its holdings of Indian stocks. There were no holdings of debt instruments in the portfolio, so there is no exposure to credit risk. The Fund does not engage in securities' lending and has confirmed with its custodian that its stocks have not been used for securities' lending. As a matter of policy, the Fund does not hedge currency exposure in the portfolio. In 2016, the Rupee depreciated by 2.6% against the US dollar and this affected the portfolio valuation. This depreciation happened in spite of favourable data on GDP growth and inflation as well as a clear government commitment to fiscal consolidation and government reform. The principal negative influences were volatile foreign portfolio investment flows arising from external factors as well as the impact of demonetization towards year-end. There were no instances during the year when market liquidity suffered disruptive events which might have prevented orderly execution of orders.
The Investment Committee also monitors the performance of market counterparties, notable stock brokers and custodians. We monitor the performance of brokers on a regular basis, taking account of execution, price, research and sales support. Transactions are allocated equally between brokers, though volumes can vary depending on specialist skills demonstrated, such as execution in particular market segments or sectors. We experienced no problems due to market disruption of execution failures during 2016.
Payment of commission rebates is not a normal practice in Indian markets and the Fund does not maintain soft-dollar arrangements, nor has it any intention of doing so. We confirm for the record, that our Ordinary Shares are not "rebate shares" and that no rebates are paid to intermediaries involved in their sale or promotion.
We continue to receive excellent service from our local market custodian and had no operational problems or failures in reporting during the year.
Risk management
Board Member Mr. Robert Meijer is responsible for oversight of risk management and reports accordingly to the Board. The key risk management guidelines concern concentration in the portfolio and dispersion of risk. We monitor the aggregate value of the top four holdings against a guideline of 40%. We further observe a 10% limit on the value of any stock holding. If the value of a hol ding exceeds this limit due to appreciation, the holding is reviewed regularly by the Investment Committee and adjusted where appropriate. Finally, in order to ensure our stock holdings can contribute to performance, we generally apply a minimum target weight of 2.5% although for tactical reasons an initial purchase may be smaller.
During the year, the upper concentration limits have been exceeded due to market appreciation; the positions concerned have been
monitored by the Investment Committee and appropriate action taken when necessary.
In terms of risk analysis, the Board monitors the Synthetic Risk and Reward Indicator (SRRI) prescribed in Article 8 and Annex I of the KII implementing Regulation on a monthly basis. According to the SRRI calculation over a five-year timespan, your Fund is in category 5 for risk evaluation purposes and this is reflected in the KID statement on the Fund's
website. This risk rating is due to a sustained period of stable returns over the timespan of the analysis. This is not typical for an
emerging markets fund and the Directors feel the indicator does not adequately reflect the risk of higher
levels of return fluctuation than in developed markets. There are additional risks involved in emerging markets investing,
including exchange rate risk, market risk arising from liquidity flows, operational risk from weaknesses in local systems and process failure and focused strategy risk where concentrated investment strategy may lose the
benefits of diversification.
The following quantitative risk data cover sixty four valuation periods which ended on an NAV calculation date during 2016. The mean return for the portfolio over the sixty four periods was -0.03% per period; the comparable figure for the benchmark was 0.04%, reflecting mean portfolio underperformance of 7 basis points per period. The standard deviation of returns was 2.4 for the portfolio and 2.4 for the benchmark, showing similar dispersion of returns around the mean for the portfolio as for the benchmark.
The highest loss in any period was 7.1% for the portfolio and 8.4% for the benchmark and during the year, the portfolio had 35 out of sixty four periods of positive return by comparison with 31 for the benchmark.
Relative to the benchmark, the portfolio had a Tracking Error of 1.1 and an Information Ratio of -2 for the year. These two ratios
demonstrate that the risk and portfolio management decisions taken during the year were inconsistent in
adding value in portfolio returns relative to the benchmark. This mainly reflects the fact that some of our holdings were perceived to be negatively affected by the impact of demonetization late in the year.
The Outlook
The Directors would like to thank our shareholders for their continuing support of the Fund. Indian markets have started 2017 very strongly as it appears that the negative effects of demonetization had been exaggerated. At the time of writing, sentiment in India has improved markedly with sustained improvement in foreign portfolio investment flows. The Indian economy remains largely domestic demand driven and thus significantly insulated against global economic surprises. Government reform efforts have enjoyed considerable success in 2016. The implementation of GST in July this year, though fraught with administrative risks, should eventually boost economic efficiency and, eventually GDP. We await initial monsoon forecasts as an indicator of prospects for aggregate demand growth but at the moment, it looks like India will lead global growth this year. Fund policy is to invest in companies from a broad market universe selected for visible earnings growth potential and high governance standards The Directors believe that Fund's portfolio is well positioned to benefit from India's world leading growth prospects and favourable domestic and foreign liquidity support for Indian equities.
Amsterdam, 25 April 2017
Board of Directors
Ian McEvatt, Chairman
Dwight Makins
Robert Meijer
Karin van der Ploeg
Financial statements Himalayan Fund N.V. Annual Report 2016 Balance sheet (before profit appropriation) 31-12-2016 31-12-2015 USD Notes USD Investments Securities 7,298,399 4.1 10,108,751 Other assets Cash at banks 670,109 5 465,306 Receivables Receivable on security transactions - 6.1 94,841 Other receivables - 6.2 - - 94,841 Current liabilities (due within one year) Payable on security transactions - 7.1 77,498 Due to redemptions 12,080 7.2 - Other liabilities, accruals and deferred income 44,160 7.3 56,570 Total current liabilities 56,240 134,068 Total of receivables and other assets less current liabilities 613,869 426,079 Total assets less current liabilities 7,912,268 10,534,830 ------------ ------------ Shareholders' equity Issued capital 17,171 8.1 17,752 Share premium 16,261,438 8.2 18,504,968 General reserve -7,987,889 8.3 -7,942,782 Undistributed result current year -378,452 8.4 -45,108 Total shareholders'equity 7,912,268 10,534,830 ------------ ------------ Net Asset Value per share 48.66 50.64 Profit & Loss account 01-01-2016 01-01-2015 31-12-2016 31-12-2015 USD Notes USD Income from investments Dividends 91,814 9.1 99,956 Interest income - 9.2 40 Other income 7,410 9.3 483 99,224 100,479 Capital gains/losses Unrealised gains on investments 545,633 4 275,208 Unrealised losses on investments -1,690,172 4 -2,224,393 Realised price gains on investments 1,629,156 4 2,843,600 Realised price losses on investments -126,585 4 -74,221 Realised currency gains on investments - 4 - Realised currency losses on investments -365,252 4 -438,088 Other exchange differences -11,554 -36,614 -18,774 345,492 Expenses Investment research fees 165,145 10.1 191,179 Other expenses 293,757 10.2 299,900 458,902 491,079 Total investment result -378,452 -45,108 ------------ ------------ Total investment result per ordinary share -2.33 -0.22 Statement of Cash Flows 01-01-2016 01-01-2015 31-12-2016 31-12-2015 USD notes USD Cash flow from investing activities Income from investments 99,224 9 100,479 Expenses -458,902 10 -491,079 Result of operations -359,678 -390,600 Purchases of investments -537,921 4 -2,827,529 Sales of investments 3,341,053 4 5,008,125 2,803,132 2,180,596 Change in short term receivables 94,841 6 -89,897 Change in current liabilities -77,827 7 45,426 17,014 -44,471 Cash flow from investing activities 2,460,468 1,745,525 Cash flow from financing activities Received on shares issued 3,629 8 236,378 Paid on shares purchased -2,247,740 8 -1,680,099 Cash flow from financing activities -2,244,111 -1,443,721 Other exchange differences -11,554 -36,614 Change in cash and cash equivalents 204,803 265,190 Cash and cash equivalents as at 1 January 465,306 200,116 ------------ ------------ Cash and cash equivalents as at 31 December 670,109 465,306 ------------ ------------ Notes 1 General Himalayan Fund N.V. ('the Fund') is an open-end investment company (in Dutch: beleggingsmaatschappij met veranderlijk kapitaal) incorporated under Dutch law and has its statutory seat in Amsterdam. The Fund is listed both on NYSE Euronext Amsterdam and on The London Stock Exchange. This annual report is prepared in accordance with Part 9 of Book 2 of the Dutch Civil Code and the Act on the Financial Supervision (AFS) ("Wet op het financieel toezicht"). Since December 1991 the Fund is licensed to undertake investment activities according to the Act on the Financial Supervision. 2. Principles of valuation 2.1 Investments The investments are valued based on the following principles: - listed securities are valued at the most recent stockmarket price as at the end of the accounting period which can be considered fair value; - non or low marketable securities are, according to the judgement of the Investment Advisor, valued at the best effort estimated price, taking into account the standards which the Investment Advisor thinks fit for the valuation of such investments. Expenses related to the purchase of investments are included in the cost of investments. Sales charges, if any, are deducted from gross proceeds and will be expressed in the capital gains/losses. 2.2 Foreign currency translation Assets and liabilities in foreign currencies are translated into US dollars at the rate of exchange as at the balance sheet date. All exchange differences are taken to the profit and loss account. Income and expenses in foreign currencies are translated at the exchange rate as per transaction date. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rates of exchange as at 31 December 2016, equivalent of 1 US dollar: ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Euro 0.94809 Srilanka Rupee 149.80005 Indian Rupee 67.87002 Bangladesh Taka 78.60005 ------------------------ --------- ---------------------------------- --------- 2.3 Other assets and liabilities Other assets and liabilities are stated at nominal value. If required, provisions have been taken for irrecoverable receivables. 2.4 Income recognition principles The result is determined by deducting expenses from the proceeds of dividend, interest and other income in the
period under review. The realized revaluations of investments are determined by deducting the purchase price from the sale proceeds. The unrealized revaluations of investments are determined by deducting the purchase price or the balance sheet value at the start of the period under review from the balance sheet value at the end of the period under review. Brokerage fees payable on the acquisition of investments, if any, are considered to be part of the investments costs, and as a result, are not taken to the profit and loss account. 2.5 Cash flow statement The Cash Flow statement has been prepared according to the indirect method. 3. Risk Management Investing in emerging and developing markets carries risks that are greater than those associated with investment in securities in developed markets. In particular, prospective investors should consider the following: 3.1 Currency Fluctuations The Fund invests primarily in securities denominated in local currencies whereas the Ordinary Shares are quoted in US dollars. The US dollar price at which the Ordinary Shares are valued is therefore subject to fluctuations in the US dollar/ local currency exchange rate. 3.2 Counterparty Risk The Fund deals principally in listed stocks traded on the BSE and the NSE in India. All transactions are book-entry and settlement is fully automated. In the event of non-delivery by either side, the transaction fails. In this case recovery can be achieved by delivery against payment or the transaction abandoned. 3.3 Concentration Risk The investment restrictions for the Fund in section IX INVESTMENT POLICIES of the Prospectus, limit the possibility for concentration of risk by stock and sector. Investors should note that the portfolio will be concentrated in the Indian sub-continent. 3.4 Market Volatility Securities exchanges in emerging markets are smaller and subject to greater volatility than those in developed markets. The Indian market has in the past experienced significant volatility and there is no assurance that such volatility will not occur in the future. 3.5 Market Liquidity A substantial proportion of market capitalization and trading value in emerging markets can be represented by a relatively small number of issuers. Also, there is a lower level of regulation and monitoring of the activities of investors, brokers and other market participants than in most developed markets. Disclosure requirements may be less stringent and there may be less public information available about corporate activity. As a result, liquidity may be impaired at times of high volatility. The Indian markets have withstood high volatility in the recent past and recovered momentum because of excellent corporate results. This has shown that the liquidity in the shares of the top companies is strong, as further emphasized by demand for those shares through Depository Receipts in overseas markets. Furthermore, standards of governance and transparency are improving dramatically under the impetus of the regulatory bodies. Other contiguous markets are not necessarily the same and the Fund only invests in them with the utmost care. 3.6 Fund Liquidity The Fund's rules allow weekly purchases and sales of Ordinary Shares but in order to allow orderly management of the portfolio in the interest of continuing shareholders, the value of purchases may be limited to 5% of the net asset value of the Fund on any one Execution Day. 3.7 Political Economy The Fund's portfolio may be adversely affected by changes in exchange rates and controls, interest rates, government policies, inflation, taxation, social and religious instability and regional geo-political developments. 3.8 Legal and Regulatory Compliance The Fund is responsible for ensuring that no action taken by it or by any contracted service provider might cause a breach of any legal or regulatory requirement. The Fund and all of its service providers maintain adequate control procedures to guard against any such occurrence and these procedures are subject to regular review. Should such a breach occur inadvertently, control procedures should detect it and institute corrective action without delay. 3.9 Financial Crisis Almost uniquely amongst financial markets, the Indian financial sector was insulated against any consequences of the recent financial crisis by the tight control exercised by the RBI. Bank balance sheets were free of toxic assets and capital ratios were maintained. Ratios of non-performing assets remained within historic norms. 3.10 Credit risk The principal credit risk is counterparty default (i.e., failure by the counterparty to perform as specified in the contract) due to financial impairment or for other reasons. Credit risk is generally higher when a nonexchange-traded or foreign exchange-traded financial instrument is involved. Credit risk is reduced by dealing with reputable counterparties. The Fund manages credit risk by monitoring its aggregate exposure to counterparties. Notes to the Balance sheet 31-12-2016 31-12-2015 4. Investments USD USD 4.1 Statement of changes in securities Position as at 1 January 10,108,751 11,907,241 Purchases 537,921 2,827,529 Sales -3,341,053 -5,008,125 Unrealised gains on investments 545,633 275,208 Unrealised losses on investments -1,690,172 -2,224,393 Realised price gains on investments 1,629,156 2,843,600 Realised price losses on investments -126,585 -74,221 Realised currency gains on investments - - Realised currency losses on investments -365,252 -438,088 Position as at 31 December 7,298,399 10,108,751 ----------- ----------- Historical cost 4,854,850 6,520,663 The portfolio comprises of shares, mainly listed. No unlisted shares were held directly by the Fund at the year end of 2016 (2015: USD 123,163). The portfolio breakdown as at 31 December 2016 is specified on page 22 of this report. 4.2 Transaction costs The transaction costs for the purchase of investments are capitalized within the historical cost price and for sales the transaction costs are discounted from the sales price. Transaction costs in 2016 are USD 11,998 (2015: USD 26,103). 5. Cash at banks This includes immediately due demand deposits at banks. 6. Receivables 6.1 Receivable on security transactions These include transactions still unsettled as at the balance sheet date. 6.2 Other receivables These include other transactions still unsettled as at the balance sheet date. 7. Current liabilities (due within one year) 7.1 Payable on security transactions These include transactions still unsettled as at the balance sheet date. 7.2 Due to redemptions These include the debts in respect of the redemptions of shares Himalayan still unsettled as at the balance sheet date. 7.3 Other liabilities, accruals and deferred income Payable investment research fee 12,246 12,511 Payable administration fee 3,931 4,363 Payable auditors fee 15,707 19,954 Other expenses payable 12,276 19,742 44,160 56,570 ----------- ----------- 8. Shareholders' equity The authorised share capital of the Fund is EUR 60,000 (2015: EUR 60,000) and consists of: Ordinary shares of EUR - 0.01 each 5,000,100 Priority shares of EUR - 0.20 each 49,995 31-12-2016 31-12-2015 8.1 Issued capital number USD USD Ordinary shares: Position as at 1 January 207,748 3,522 4,258 Sold 70 1 44 Purchased -45,495 -455 -321 Revaluation -127 -459 Position as at 31 December 162,323 2,941 3,522 ------------------ ----------- ----------- Priority shares: Position as at 1 January 49,995 14,230 14,230 Sold - - - Revaluation - - Position as at 31 December 49,995 14,230 14,230 ------------------ ----------- -----------
Total issued capital 17,171 17,752 ----------- ----------- As at 31 December 2016 the issued and subscribed EUR EUR share capital amounts to: (Ordinary shares, par value EUR 0.01 (2015: EUR 0.01) 4,450,005 44,500 44,500 (Priority shares, par value EUR 0.20 (2015: EUR 0.20) 49,995 9,999 9,999 54,499 54,499 ----------- ----------- The Fund became open-ended on 7 April 2000. As at 31 December 2016 a total of 4,287,682 Ordinary Shares have been purchased, meaning that 162,323 Ordinary Shares are still outstanding as at 31 December 2016. Ordinary Shares purchased by the Fund are directly charged against capital and share premium. 8.2 Share premium USD USD Position as at 1 January 18,504,968 19,947,953 Received on shares sold 3,628 236,334 Paid on shares purchased -2,247,285 -1,679,778 Revaluation of outstanding capital 127 459 Position as at 31 December 16,261,438 18,504,968 ----------- ----------- 31-12-2016 31-12-2015 USD USD 8.3 General reserve Position as at 1 January -7,942,782 -11,914,402 Transferred to undistributed result -45,107 3,971,620 Position as at 31 December -7,987,889 -7,942,782 ----------------- ----------- 8.4 Undistributed result Position as at 1 January -45,107 3,971,620 Transferred from general reserve 45,107 -3,971,620 Total investment result -378,452 -45,108 Position as at 31 December -378,452 -45,108 ----------------- ----------- Three years Himalayan Fund N.V. 31-12-2016 31-12-2015 31-12-2014 Net Asset Value (USD x 1,000) Net Asset Value according to balance sheet 7,912 10,535 12,024 Less: value priority shares 14 14 14 7,898 10,521 12,010 ------------------ ----------------- ----------- Number of Ordinary Shares outstanding 162,323 207,748 235,416 Per Ordinary Share (USD) Net Asset Value share 48.66 50.64 51.01
Notes to the Profit & Loss account
9. Income from investments
9.1 Dividends
This refers to net cash dividends including withholding tax. Stock dividends are considered to be cost free shares. Therefore, stock dividends are not presented as income.
9.2 Interest income
Most of this amount was received on outstanding cash balances.
9.3 Other income
From 6 March 2009 this refers to the charges of 0.35% received on shares issued and repurchased.
These costs are to cover transaction costs in relation with the purchase and sale of Ordinary Shares and are booked as an income for the Fund.
01-01-2016 01-01-2015 10. Expenses 31-12-2016 31-12-2015 USD USD 10.1 Investment research fees Research Fee 162,000 162,271 Custody Fee and Charges 3,145 28,908 ---------- ---------- 165,145 191,179 ---------- ----------
Expenses directly related to the management of investments, like custody fees and transfer charges as well as other paying agent fees, are deducted from the result.
10.2 Other expenses Administration Fees and Charges 57,725 59,282 Company Secretarial and Domiciliation Fees 33,471 33,509 Bank Expenses 224 2,563 Regulatory Fees and Charges 26,672 19,938 Listing Expenses 14,500 19,000 Audit Fees 19,916 29,441 Fiscal Advisory Fees 17,262 14,500 Advertising and Promotion 15,047 8,287 Listing Agent Fees 36,678 36,720 Directors Fees 63,400 62,150 Board Expenses 20,406 25,370 Correspondent Bank fees 8,612 2,981 Miscellaneous 3,619 2,667 VAT Reclaims previous years -23,775 -16,508 --------- --------- 293,757 299,900 --------- ---------
Audit fees include the audit of the financial statements by the external auditor Mazars amounting to USD 23,773 (2015: USD 16,838).
Ongoing Charges Ratio The Ongoing Charges Ratio (cost ratio) is calculated as follows: the total expenses of the Fund divided by the average NAV*. The Ongoing Charges Ratio of the Fund for the reporting period is equal to: 5.12 % (2015: 4.28 %). Turnover ratio The turnover ratio is calculated as follows: the total sum of purchases plus sales minus subscriptions minus redemptions divided by the average NAV *. The turnover ratio of the Fund for the reporting period is equal to: 18.16 % (2015: 51.62 %). * - The average Net Asset Value of the Company for reporting period is calculated as the sum of every available Net Asset Value in the current year divided by the number of observations. Comparison of real cost with cost according to Prospectus** According to Prospectus Actual costs USD USD Investment Research fee (1) 144,000 162,000 Administration fee (2) 57,725 57,725 Secretarial and Domiciliation fees (3) 33,471 33,471 Costs for the Board (4) 100,000 83,806 **- As per the Prospectus of 7 June 2010. 1) Ian McEvatt receives an annual fee of USD 114,000 for investment research and IndAsia Fund Advisors Pvt Ltd receives an annual fee of USD 42,000. According to the Prospectus the research investment fees amount USD 144,000. However, actual costs in 2016 amount USD 162,000. The difference is caused by increased research fees of Indasia Fund Advisors Pvt.Ltd. 2) CACEIS Bank, Netherlands Branch is paid a fixed fee of EUR 50,000 per year for administration services. 3) Inviqta has been appointed to provide domicile and company secretarial services to the Fund for a fixed fee of EUR 25,000 (exclusive VAT) per year. 4) The Prospectus states that the remuneration of the Directors is subject to a limit of USD 100,000 in aggregate per year. In 2016 the remuneration of the Directors was USD 62,985 (inclusive VAT) in total so far. Directors fees per person are as follows: Ian McEvatt: USD 10,000 (2015: USD 10,000); Dwight Makins: USD 18,500 (2015: USD 18,500); Robert Meijer: USD 22,453 (2015: USD 22,385); Karin van der Ploeg***: USD 12,476 (2015: USD 12,100). Board expenses (exclusive remuneration of the Directors) amount to USD 20,406 in 2016. *** Karin van der Ploeg is a partner of Inviqta. It has been agreed that members of the Board who are also directors/partners of the service providers of the Fund receive a fixed annual management fee of USD 10,000. Employees The Fund has no employees. Amsterdam, 25 April 2017 Board of Directors Ian McEvatt, Chairman Dwight Makins Robert Meijer Karin van der Ploeg Portfolio breakdown As per 31 December 2016 percentage of total Net Market value Asset Value India USD % Auto Ancilliary 504,178 6.4 13,000 Bajaj Auto 504,178 Construction 802,982 10.1 190,000 HeidelbergCement 307,241 135,369 Kalpataru Power Transmission 495,741
Consumer discretionary 607,624 7.7 240,000 Indian Hotels 348,489 150,000 VIP Industries 259,135 Consumer goods 1,193,800 15.1 28,000 Agro Tech Foods 187,712 3,500 Nestle India 310,877 80,000 Pidilite 695,211 Energy 405,886 5.1 30,000 Indraprastha Gas 405,886 Financials 1,116,096 14.1 27,000 HDFC Bank 479,850 60,000 Kotak Mahindra Bank 636,246 Healthcare 945,309 11.9 20,000 Aurobindo Pharma 197,230 12,000 Lupin 262,905 25,000 Torrent Pharmaceuticals 485,174 Industrials 334,076 4.2 25,000 Supreme Industries 334,076 Media 353,502 4.5 250,000 IBN18 Broadcast 134,080 38,000 Shemaroo Entertainment 219,422 Technology 1,034,946 13.1 250,000 Firstsource Solutions 139,237 18,000 HCL Technologies 219,583 22,000 Infosys 327,585 10,000 Tata Consultancy 348,541 Total Equity 7,298,399 92.2 Cash and cash equivalents 613,869 7.8 NAV: 7,912,268 100.0 Other information Personal interest Mr. McEvatt is the beneficial owner of 15,000 Ordinary Shares of Himalayan Fund N.V. at the year end of 2016; the shares are held in a Self-Invested Pension Plan administered by Curtis Banks Ltd. under discretionary management at Charles Stanley Ltd. None of the other directors hold any shares in the Fund. Special controlling rights Special rights are assigned to holders of Priority Shares. The most important rights are: - to submit a binding nomination for the appointment of the Directors - to give their approval in advance of amendments in the Articles of Association, legal merger, legal split and dissolving the Fund. The Priority Shares are all held in the name of Iceman Capital Ltd. Priority Shares During 2015 & 2016 49.995 Priority Shares were held by Iceman Capital Ltd. At the beginning of 2009 the nominal value of the Priority Shares was Eur 0.01 each. On 26 August 2009 the Articles of Association were amended and the nominal value of the Priority Shares was increased to Eur 0.20 each. The directors of Iceman Capital Ltd. are Messrs. I. McEvatt, M.T. Cordwell, J.W. Owen, E.H. Jostrom. Appropriation of result In accordance with the Fund's Articles of Association the Board will propose to the Annual General Meeting of Shareholders that the result will be added to the general reserve and that no dividend will be distributed. Independent Auditor's report Reference is made to the independent auditor's report included hereafter. Post balance sheet events There have occurred no significant events after balance sheet date which will have an impact on the Fund.
This information is provided by RNS
The company news service from the London Stock Exchange
END
FR OKFDPNBKDOQB
(END) Dow Jones Newswires
May 02, 2017 02:00 ET (06:00 GMT)
1 Year Himalayan Fd Chart |
1 Month Himalayan Fd Chart |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions