We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Stock Type |
---|---|---|---|
Fund-E Inv | FEI | London | Ordinary Share |
Open Price | Low Price | High Price | Close Price | Previous Close |
---|---|---|---|---|
0.02 |
Top Posts |
---|
Posted at 14/11/2008 12:10 by godolphin What? Yes, I think he didn't understand what I had posted. I just assumed we're all experienced investors and know that you can't place stock at less than the face value. So, for working capital they are not likely to reorg the stock - eg. zyzygy placed at face value which was higher than the current price. It's not unusual, specially with aim being so low. Nor does it mean the share price will race upwards.(I no longer have any zyz shares btw!). |
Posted at 23/8/2008 20:44 by 5uchchi I am really disaapointed and disgusted with this company for not doing anything useful to protect small private investors like us. After reading all the previous comments I am really frightened that my investment(hard earned money) will turn out to be nothing. Can anyone shed some light on this stock whether directors are loyal to investors or just keen on look after themself until it becomes bankcrupt. |
Posted at 28/6/2008 14:38 by godolphin I have more than diddy and less than amo. lol. But I was the one buying at 0.055p.Dr. Dimashki can be contacted here or here But he may be busy sorting out a rather large bridge! I note that Mubeen are advertising in the Meds May newsletter. They were the original other Dubai investor, though their holding seems to have gone to Mrs. Moussalli. |
Posted at 15/6/2008 21:07 by amorruso There is no FEI website worth talking about simply because they only have a presence re AIM rules. The company only exists to clean up debts and then RTO....there has been no withdrawl of the land sale either as you will soon see.The current price suggests that investors have lost all their money whilst a Middle Eastern investor invested £500k of his...so, think hard about this one! LOL |
Posted at 11/5/2008 13:22 by amorruso £2m will leave around £1m cash for an RTO and usually these things trade at substantial premiums to the cash in expectancy of the deals to come. I would have thought that the Middle Eastern investor would have something up his sleeve. |
Posted at 10/5/2008 16:35 by barrywhit Amo,Lets just hope they haven't sold it on the cheap to friends..... There investor relations are pretty bad, lets hope we haven't been stitched-up... |
Posted at 09/5/2008 08:55 by godolphin They have a plot of land, it's now being advertised. Believe or not building hasn't stopped in the UK so I would expect a deal to be done with a builder like George Wimpey or similar. Between £2 to £3m. Then what? The Dubai investors came here before the first planning permission. One of those investors we know a fair amount about. He runs MED and MEDS, the companies that are looking at build towns in the Middle East to be run by private companies. He was also a director of a Canadian Energy company - Altek, which was looking at supplying power solutions to the Middle East - though they haven't done much recently in that area. The second Dubai investor was a registered property developer in Dubai, then turned into a person - Mrs Moussalli. Not much else known (by me anyway). The guys running FEI have put in some of their own money. So, surely, they have a cunning plan? Least they have to justify what they do to the shareholders. lol - like that matters! Anyway, we can't sell now - looks like you can only get .04p for the first 1m. |
Posted at 29/4/2008 17:08 by amorruso None at all KAMPY but directors are needing hung for incompetence. There is a total lack of desire to communicate with shareholders or potential investors....shockinIt is more than reflected in the share price though.... |
Posted at 31/3/2008 08:56 by godolphin Why would a low price make any difference? They are legally obliged to work for the good of the company, not for the good of another company. The Dubai investors are large holders and the other directors have a few shares as well. I assume they want a profit on their investment. Least they won't be diluting us in the short term. |
Posted at 02/3/2008 15:15 by amorruso I agree that price sensitive information shouldn't be held from the market and shareholders have every right to demand answers from the directors. However, that is how an RTO works i'm afraid i.e. the fat cats get their shares for next to nothing though it tends to send the shares rocketing upwards.Having said that, these directors should get shot for their performance. There are another three plots for building in Kilsyth at the moment and we have all known who the builders will be for months but not at Newtown St!! The disregard for investors is very poor. |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions