Share Name Share Symbol Market Type Share ISIN Share Description
Finsbury Food Group LSE:FIF London Ordinary Share GB0009186429 ORD 1P
  Price Change % Change Share Price Bid Price Offer Price High Price Low Price Open Price Shares Traded Last Trade
  -1.50p -1.32% 112.50p 112.00p 113.00p 114.00p 112.50p 114.00p 213,531.00 11:48:26
Industry Sector Turnover (m) Profit (m) EPS - Basic PE Ratio Market Cap (m)
Food Producers 319.7 11.8 6.1 18.4 144.01

Finsbury Food (FIF) Latest News

More Finsbury Food News
Finsbury Food Takeover Rumours

Finsbury Food (FIF) Share Charts

1 Year Finsbury Food Chart

1 Year Finsbury Food Chart

1 Month Finsbury Food Chart

1 Month Finsbury Food Chart

Intraday Finsbury Food Chart

Intraday Finsbury Food Chart

Finsbury Food (FIF) Discussions and Chat

Finsbury Food Forums and Chat

Date Time Title Posts
25/11/201608:21Finsbury Foods - A Sweet Investment?1,938.00
01/12/201418:52Negative Aspects about FIF178.00
13/4/201207:29*** Finsbury Foods ***-
23/1/201210:24Finsbury Food-Growing-Acquisition Hungry-Time to Buy?1,738.00
13/7/201112:48Finsbury Foods - A Sweet Investment?-

Add a New Thread

Finsbury Food (FIF) Most Recent Trades

No Trades
Trade Time Trade Price Trade Size Trade Value Trade Type
View all Finsbury Food trades in real-time

Finsbury Food (FIF) Top Chat Posts

DateSubject
03/12/2016
08:20
Finsbury Food Daily Update: Finsbury Food Group is listed in the Food Producers sector of the London Stock Exchange with ticker FIF. The last closing price for Finsbury Food was 114p.
Finsbury Food Group has a 4 week average price of 120.13p and a 12 week average price of 125.55p.
The 1 year high share price is 138.50p while the 1 year low share price is currently 102.50p.
There are currently 128,005,197 shares in issue and the average daily traded volume is 513,619 shares. The market capitalisation of Finsbury Food Group is £144,005,846.63.
05/11/2015
20:02
jakedog2: NT bought in. May give price a boost .... From his lastest blog today. An interesting one that came up at the seminars is Finsbury Food (FIF) which provides high end bakery, cakes and the like. With the success of Bake Off, demand for high quality bakes has risen (gettit?) and the company is certainly making a lot of dough. Profits are rising fast and forecast to rise strongly this year - looks like a share to me that rerates higher, stops for a while then goes up again. Looks like this one is about to get a sudden rerating higher again and I'm looking for a rise of a further 25% to get the share price up to about 125p. Pretty low risk too unless people really stop eating their kind of stuff.
31/3/2015
13:42
jpjp100: Judging by the share price in the last few days, I would say that the results roadshow has been well received It has been pointed out to me that the dividend promised equates to 4% yield at the 59p price of the equity raise last year. Buyers back then will like that number and potential buyers that missed out on that opportunity might be kicking themselves - especially as the story is a good one - and looking for an entry. Maybe more associated with the industry will be looking at FIF as a leader of the necessary industry consolidation?
01/12/2014
18:52
smithie6: not sure whether the acq. of Fletchers is perhaps over priced a bit FIF looks to have a reported EBITDA of 10.7M giving a low ratio to cap. value of 3.7- 4 (with share price at 60p) EBITDA/share looks to have been around 16p (10.7M/66M) (that ratio would reduce even more if one removed the recent large investment in new machinery, phps 6-8M, and the property held and considered a value of EV wrt EBITDA, perhaps reducing the ratio to 3 !) and FIF was roughly debt free or would have been phaps in 1 yr while Fletchers EBITDA was 6M (59M new shares issued) yet Fletchers valued at 56M a ratio of around 9 (and had debt) a valuation ratio MUCH higher than the FIF ratio EBTDA/new share is 8.5....much lower than the 16 for 'old' FIF !!!!!!! (for this value I have deducted 1M as estimated interest cost for the 21M debt used with shares to obtain the 6M EBITDA from Fletchers) The large difference in EBITDA per share ratios between old FIF and Fletchers makes me wonder if FIF has over paid to acquire Fletchers, compared with options choices to benefit shareholders, such as perhaps increasing the divi for the old FIF to drive up the share price (towards 120p for the old FIF)....for a low risk solution to benefit shareholders. (from the summary info available...it looks difficult to me to calculate the expected EPS and debt. in 1 years time...although the cash generation should reduce the debt level and hence the finance costs...I guess some people will have enough data and have calculated some numbers...) I guess part of the idea is to increase the EPS over coming years by reducing the increased debt from cashflow.....(not going to attract many tech sector investors !) (I wonder if the shareholders would have done better if a larger divi was paid or share buybacks done....instead of using the cashflow to make this acquisition....last big acquisition was over priced and shareholders lost a lot of money as a result....) one can see possible cross selling benefits etc....but perhaps a lot of that was already included in the price paid for Fletchers...and cross selling possibilities is perhaps only in the direction from FIF to Fletchers rather than in the other direction ----- one might argue that FIF was 50% undervalued at 60p....as its takeover value... issuing a large number of FIF shares as part of the acquisition cost could be argued to be like giving away assets to the sellers of Fletchers, ..and one wonders whether FIF could have done something to have got the share price up before doing the acquisition, such as presentations, higher divi, a bonus divi announcement for X months in future etc. ---- Risk one might argue that FIF could have stayed as it was, and could have increased its divi to say 3p (from 6p EPS, after tax) which would have been a 5% divi wrt 60p share price. Or even higher if the cash was not needed. If all of the 6p EPS was paid out as a divi then one could argue the share price would have gone to 120p to give a yield of 5%. With little risk to FIF shareholders. Whereas the acquisition infers a level of risk, as well as opportunities perhaps. Be interesting to see how the share price and EPS performs over coming years and how it compares to a share price of 120p, if 6p divi had been paid from the old FIF. ------ Last big acquisition that FIF made, 5 or so years later....and with turnover doubled after the acqusition of each part to the merger.... the share price was 2/3rd of the price paid for the acquisition !! (some ppl have had doubts about the legality of that deal, whether to benefit shareholders (ref. the LAW) or the chairman.....who gained by selling X Million shares at arguably a false high price....to make him richer. Using his votes and those of David Marshall (LFI). London mkts are a cesspit (Quindell, Cupid, MOS, Lamprell, Sefton Res. the list is endless !.....with few or no prosecutions) Will this be the same ?!, share price of 2/3rd in 5 years time, 40p ?!
22/9/2014
07:24
topvest: Results out. Solid but nothing to cause too much excitement. Looks like they are definitely on the acquisition trail, but biding their time for the right deal. They could do with getting the share price up first though so they are able to use shares as part of any deal. Overall, a good recovery over the last couple of years but they now need evidence of some growth to move forwards.
26/11/2011
18:13
markt: so...some -ve factors about FIF, its sector etc (there are +ve factors as well.....see other threads.....this thread is trying to ensure a more open discussion of pros and cons) - the market seems to think that the acquisition of Lightbody for 52M incl debt and 4M equiv. value of lease for around 46-50M of turnover !!..(very high ratio in low profit food sector)...was a very bad move.....that overpaid big time.... Mr Saatchi, the chairman was very happy....he sold almost all ..and made millions and left in 2008. The CEO left. The FD left a few months before. Virtually at same time as the acquisition the shares stopped at their peak of 110p and then started their down trend to fall for 2 years to around 12p !. The market was not impressed. - the 'new' FD S.Boyd did not buy shares.....so he did not see them as cheap....till July 2011 at the same time as he was given a massive amount of share options, much larger amount that the shares he bought...so one infers that he only bought the shares because of the options. Essentially the same for the CEO J.Duffy. - very low profit margin. PAT is around 2% of turnover. - gross profit % has seen a fall over the last few years and that is despite investing in new machines, reducing staff numbers and saving costs in every aspect of production ..for some years now). This is important for a company producing very low PAT margin. - profit is small compared to the wages bill. that creates a risk of X. - the adjusted EPS for the years 2009, 2010, 2011 is 6.9p, 7.0 and 7.1p. This is despite a 20M increase in turnover between 2010 and 2011 and less staff in 2011 than 2010. And no noticeable staff reductions made in 2011. One would have expected the diluted EPS in 2011 to have increase noticeably versus 2010 but it did not. This shows imho that the margin has reduced. -diluted EPS around 2007-08 = 10.5p and in 2011 = 7.1p. despite the increase in turnover, reduction in staff numbers and other cost savings such as combining factories etc - turnover over the years 2008-2010 FELL if you take into account inflation ! ...shows that it is a difficult sector...and that total sales in cake sector (big part of turnover for FIF) have probably fallen - the ups and downs in turnover shows that sales and profits are dependant on external factors outside the control of FIF....whether they make a good product or not - they make a physical product....so to sell it a distance from the factory involves costs and makes it harder for them to compete in other countries, and/or reduce the margin after paying transport costs - the interest cost + depreciation cost is the same as the PAT. - the PAT is only approx. 2 X interest cost......if they have to pay higher interest rates at some time in the future then the PAT will be hit hard - high debt relative to PAT. around 32M bank debt and 4.3M deferred payments. paying off around 4M /year on average...so 9 years to pay off approx. Actual debt pay off in the future....will only be known after the future has occurred ! - they do not own most of the brands they produce...and they do not own the outlets....hence a lot of things that affect performance are outside of their own hands. - they do not receive long term orders for most of sales. instead it appears that they receive daily and/or weekly orders. The supermarket does not really care if they sell bread from company 1 or company 2....they are interested in making maximum profits. - the supermarket chains are experts in making suppliers compete on price - it is a bad sector historically. many companies have gone bust or been bought out at low prices - the P/E ratings for shares for companies in the sector are normally low - FIF main turnover comes from cake sector where it is No.1 or No. 2 in the UK it appears....it is unlikely that they can get people to eat more cake than they do at present. (the competitors will also be ....competing !) - risk of reduced sales in the sector due to retailing sector having a hard time, due to economic problems - most of FIF sales are cakes and hence are not basic eating items but are an extra. In times of economic problems like now...there is a risk of X for sales.and for margin - to increase sales FIF always has to buy and use more raw materials and gas and wages. In return they get a very small profit, 2% PAT of turnover at FIF level. - to increase sales above a certain point they have to add shift working...and after that to rent another factory and buy expensive machines...and provide staff.....large shifts in turnover can not be switched ON/OFF in 1 day. ...for say a software company it is a different situation. - the board appears to have performed very badly. The FIF board made at acquisition that cost 38M + 4M real value of lease + approx. 10M debt. ie. 52M. That acquisition looks to be the cause of the collapse in the FIF share price ...started immediately after the acquisition. The share price is still only 1/3rd of what it was then the acquisition was made. ....at the same time the CEO left , a few months after the CEO left and the FD left before (he would have been involved in the take over discussions) !! Did the FD and chairman know what was about to happen even though it was them that did the deal ?!! - the CEO keeps changing. Will the current new CEO leave in 1 or 2 years if he manages to exercise his massive options package ? and receive 1 years salary ? and then yet another CEO....and yet another big options package ? - do the option writers know what they are doing ? small options package for previous CEO and he did a good job !! (EPS up, share price to 100p !!) resigned himself, if he sold then he made good profit. Ex-chairman made millions by exercising options and warrants at 20p and 30p and selling at 90p !!...Now massive options package for new directors which they can exercise and then leave if they wish in 2013. Repeated dilution. - a lot of on-going dilution in the EPS by repeatedly providing options to directors. - current amount of options is very big as a % of the number of existing shares - the accounts for recent years are full of words like "challenging", "difficult" - wages bill and cost of materials is very big versus PAT. risk of X. - if increase wages bill by 3% every year....it increases costs by millions ..then it is a big risk to the amount of FIF profit. - sales and profit is dependant in pasrt on cost of raw materials. On 2-7-2008 the co. announced that profit would be down by 1.5M due to material costs (flour, eggs, butter) having increased. The co. needs X years to pay off its debt, could raw material costs be high during one of those years ? - no dividend since has to concentrate on reducing debt. - risks if economic problems get worse, which is expected in Europe and may encroach into the UK since UK sells 40% of exports to Europe..so they are linked... - if Euro falls then UK economy will suffer due to pound being more expensive - if Euro falls then FIF sales to Europe would be expected to be hit. If Euro falls by say 20% and selling price in Euros increases by 20% then one could envisage that there is a risk of X that european sales could stop....completely (since products made in Eurozone could then be cheaper). -------- FIF has had years of acquisitions....and of moving production from factory 1 to factory 2 to reduce costs...reduce costs by closing site of factory 1. Investing in new machines which produce more for the same costs..... and the result so far seems to be that profitability is the same as it was X years ago. 7.0p diluted EPS in 2010 and 7.1p diluted EPS in 2011 despite 20M more turnover. ADVFN says diluted EPS was 7.4p in 2008 and also 7.4p in 2011. ie. that the acquisition of Lightbody has not increased the EPS !!.... ie. appears that FIF is having to run hard and make many improvements ....to stay still.. ---- The big options issued in July 2011 (6.5M) and the existing large number of options will be a big increase in the number of diluted shares in 2012 accounts and 2013, makes it harder to increase the diluted EPS in 2012 and 2013. ---- The issuing of massive amounts of options would infer for many people that the board perceive that it is not an easy smooth road for FIF in 2012 and 2013 and there are many risks.....and hence that massive incentives are needed for the directors....to try to make sure that they stay and to try to provide motivation. ----- The number of options is now a massive %. (I don't think any of the 'longs' realise).
19/11/2011
18:26
markt: Aleman/Boffster If you know how the orders and sales structure works for selling via supermarkets can you possibly post ? And how far ahead do you think they may forward buy sugar and wheat ? I don't know and interested to know/learn. The supermarkets take product on a sale or return basis if it is not sold ? or they place a fixed order and pay for it, sold or not ? If a fixed order then only for say 1 week ahead and they can stop all orders at any time ? I assume that s.market chain may not want to advance order X tonnes/week for next 6 months and g'tee to pay for it all....since may not be able to sell it all and then lose loads of money... And for how many months of operation would FIF forward buy sugar and wheat and eggs ? I assume that can not forward buy for too many weeks/months...since if price then falls wrt order price...then competition may buy at lower price and sell at lower price...or if smarket chain reduces its order then you may have to re-sell or cancel some of forward buys and you could lose money on that.... ----- If wheat/sugar prices are noticeably higher in 2012 or 2013 or 2014...then FIF share price would be expected to fall ? If Euro falls how could it affect prices of raw materials ? If pound falls ('cause exports to Eurozone fall due to experts rising in price due to Euro fall) how could if affect prices of raw materials ? (up I assume) If Rouble rises then gas for cooking rises in price ?
31/10/2011
18:27
markt: Boffster ....yes, I am a holder..... and I think that the FIF share price has a good chance of moving higher from here, high profit versus cap. value, could break through 25p resistance after failing many times chart looks a bit like a compressing triangle coming to a point possibly overcome resistance at the tip (but FIF shares also have -ve points !!) --- .... I think that one of you big holders should go and voice any questions from msg board users. I dont think any of my points are relevant to ask at the AGM.....mostly extra info about one of the directors of FIF (OK, creator of FIF) and poor track record of that person in other companies they have created unless you want to ask D.M. if any mistake was made in the acquisition of Lightbody and the amount of debt taken on and in hindsight if he would have done it differently. and perhaps ask if there is no option to sell any assett to boost the balance sheet and reduce debt ====== Spaceparallax You doubt the accuser. (but I know that any -ve info is not popular on this message board, probably since some posters have large positions in FIF shares) I repeat below the numbers for LFI, large investor in FIF, 8M shares. The numbers are true and you can cross check. The numbers do not depend on the accuser. Just fact. NAV was higher in the 90s that in recent years. ie. I infer that D.Marshall (FIF director) has a bad track record as an investment manager. (At WSE it is also negative growth, massive share issues at 56p in 1995, and 50p in 2007, price now to sell = 38p 16 years later. Also controlled by D.Marshall) LFI, owns around 8M shares in FIF....D.Marshall in practice controls LFI 1993 LFI NAV = 37p. 1994 NAV = 34p. 2011 LFI NAV = 29p at last interim results, and 26p in February 2011. Negative growth over 18 years. ----- I would like to remove the directors from WSE/LFI or to have a distribution of the shares held (incl. FIF) to WSE/LFI shareholders.....to provide many advantages. (D.M. has been a director at LFI since 1971 so wont be in rush to give it up !). But I need more votes in order to be able to call an EGM or add a vote to the AGM. One day it may happen. ----- The recorded bad track record of the person that created FIF initially by backing it into a shell and who was behind the FIF strategy of acquisitions (the big acquisition knocked the FIF share price for 6 I believe, due to resulting high FIF debt) is relevant background information for this message board imo.
28/10/2011
14:39
markt: The facts completely disagree with what you have written in your post. (most info is slightly off-thread.....but relates to 2 non-execs at FIF (David Marshall and Edward Beale)....so some people may find some info of interest) Finsbury. Massive acquistion around 85p, under Mr Marshall's impulse imo. Share price now 25p. Approx. 1/3rd. Not been a success. Creston. started in 2000 at around 100p...11 years later and share price is 90p, with negligible or low dividends. Not been a success. Western selection. biggest share issues in 1995 at 56p. 2M new shares at 64p in 2006. And 6M new shares issued in 2007 effectively at 50p (from 12M shares to 18M). Share price now if want to recoup your cash = 38p !. Not been a success. Pay 56p in 1995 and only get 38p if sell now in 2011 !!. Terrible !. Dividends around 3%, not kept up with inflation. In no way can it be viewed as "reasonably solid overall". LFI has performed worse than WSE. Average price in last 3 years is lower than average price in the 90s, 20 years ago. Not been a success. MWB. Share price has collapsed from its peak of around 3 pounds I think it was, now 24p, at risk of going bust. Sufferred from too much debt and gearing, also hit FIF share price. Northbridge, big success but not enough to provide good performance from WSE. One problem with WSE:LFI is that over 10 years they consume 30% of the assetts due to running costs. 2 periods of 10 years is 2 blocks of 30%, it adds up. And Mr D.Marshall receives around 107k/year from being a director at companies where LFI/WSE invests.....paid to "an overseas company". Over 10 years that is over 1M pounds. (D.M. is resident in South Africa....while has close knowledge of benefits of registering in Luxembourg, Channel Islands, Virgin Islands etc, so perhaps paid to tax haven to avoid taxes). In response to the bad performance the board under Mr David Marshall's control introduced a benefits scheme at WSE and LFI.....with a son as one of the 2 main beneficiaries while intentionally not mentioning that fact in the paperwork to vote on the scheme and intentionally not informing shareholders of the conditions that need to be achieved. So shareholders may continue to get poorer while a son of the main director may get richer. And D.Marshall may receive some shares as well. Shares at no cost I understand. --- ...use of LFI apartment (2.1M pounds) by employees of Monteagle Marshall (3 sons work there, some subsidiaries are registered at same offices in London, also used by FIF), so it could be used by David Marshall, the CEO....or a son or son+ family ..and there was a high cost car in old accounts..but you only see this info if you obtain the subsidiary accounts, so PIs will never find out ...at listed company level Edward Beale (non-exec. at FIF and the CEO at City Group, which runs LFI and WSE) intentionally imo never gives a break down of the costs in LFI/WSE accounts seen by the market. Stops any shareholder complaining about misuse of company funds if no info is given !! ==== Monteagle S.A. by the way.... a very strange beast... import export....and runs a sizeable portfolio of listed shares as well ..very strange imo I know of no other listed company that is a normal business and also runs a portfolio of shares; outside of the finance. (maybe the real interest for Mr Marshall and related parties is personal gain from investments, resulting from knowledge from operating in the investment sector....or buying/selling in companies where WSE/LFI has inside information, but complying with the regulations rather than from growing the LFI/WSE share price). noting that related party of Mr D.Marshall (operating from the same offices in London as WSE/LFI and FIF) invested in loan notes of MWB which have proved a good investment imo, paying approx. 9.75% over X years that adds up.... various private investing companies operating from the same offices in London as WSE/LFI and FIF. D.Marshall has his own investment company registered there ---- WSE/LFI do not own controlling holdings in these companies......and the WSE/LFI stakes are not the cause of these investee companies being lowly valued (the low FIF share price results partly from the debt, tough sector, "challenging conditions", etc not because LFI own X %, approx 15% I think, +/-....if someone wanted to buy FIF they could even if LFI voted against it) ---- PIs have complained (and are still not happy) about share options for directors at companies where David Marshall is a director and where he or people he controls sit on the renumeration committee that decides on those options. Creston, FIF, WSE, LFI ...... Some of these D.M. related companies do not comply with the disclosure regulations for selling shares (Lord Saatchi sales at FIF, 5% sale on 4th October at NBI, Suffolk Life 4.8% at WSE itself.... no RNS notice have reported) a common factor is perhaps the cause, that the secretarial services are all provided by a D.Marshall company, City Group PLC.
27/10/2011
17:16
markt: ...FIF is looking quite good recently... but at another company where David Marshall pulled the strings and with a similar strategy (ie. lots of debt and gearing) looks in risk of going bust, MWB. (was 2 pounds, now 25p !!) (at FIF , David Marshall backed FIF into a shell and was the creator of the acquistion and synergy policy and hence the acquisition that has hit the FIF share price so hard ever since, due to high debt levels.... and at Creston the same David Marshall policy/plan has failed thus far, with the Creston shares being worth less now than they were 10 years ago when the policy/venture was started.... at Doctors Direct PLC ...David Marshall was the force that pushed its IPO, and as chairman allowed the directors to burn the 800k pounds or so raised in less than 18 months with no resulting noticeable income being generated as a result(with many related parties transactions and payments to themselves and friends for extra work !)....causing it to de-list with shareholders losing all. (Edward Beale was also a non exec. director, also a non-exec at FIF, chartered accountant, supposed to monitor the numbers/money, failed, hopefully do better in his role at FIF) My point ? ....just to be aware of the wider picture...and risks of debt..and the bad 10-20 year track record of certain FIF directors (10-20 year performance of WSE and LFI has been bad, down...both controlled by David Marshall)....and be aware that LFI/David Marshall was probably also responsible for the recent share option awards at FIF which have caused various PI complaints on this msg board....(Edward Beale sits on FIF renumeration committee (2 people) and is completely under David Marshall's control since various companies he controls pays all of E.B.s wages....)
17/8/2011
17:53
markt: Well FIF share price has gone up anyway ! maybe the theme of LSE/AIM directors should be discussed more often ! === Bit of a bad reflection on LSE/AIM directors generally imo if Aleman and me don't have so much trust for directors generally......both of us probably been around a while......and sadly seen a lot of dubious director/company actions. === for Joe Public the share game is much more difficult....compared to the London brokers and 'Cityslickers'....(if anyone remembers that !, 2000/2001, bought shares (and told friends/co-workers, incl. the editor, was it the Daily Mail ?, ramped a share in national paper and sold into the price rise (internet bubble days so big price rises some times, then repeated )....found guilty....but I think they didnt even go to prison !) ah well, guess it ain't gonna change any time soon..... (the recent and on-going News of the World is another example of corrupt press....because in the UK the regulators dont regulate.....probably because they have no power.....since the powerful people dont want regulation....they want to take advantage of their power....eg. News International having numerous meetings with the PM and with ministers.....the politicians want to use the press barons and their newspaper coverage and TV channel coverage for their own advantage.... the N.I. saga looks like it will be unravelled slowly and that important heads will roll.....(all obvious to the general public I think that hacking was widespread and on-going and managed and paid for by the press bosses that stood to make profits from it....proving it in court is not so easy...) Joe Public....just pawns ....where what we think largely results from what information we are given...and that looks to be largely manipulated/managed... the non-regulation of the press has some similarities with the light regulation of the UK stock markets imo ....appears that unarmed man shot dead by police ...and there appears to be no news and no public outcry....worrying...and previously another one on the metro..the Brazilian man... regulation of the police !!...perhaps also doesnt happen. ==== my post is off thread.....if anyone objects I dont mind deleting it tomorrow....
Finsbury Food share price data is direct from the London Stock Exchange
Your Recent History
LSE
GKP
Gulf Keyst..
LSE
QPP
Quindell
FTSE
UKX
FTSE 100
LSE
IOF
Iofina
FX
GBPUSD
UK Sterlin..
Stocks you've viewed will appear in this box, letting you easily return to quotes you've seen previously.

Register now to create your own custom streaming stock watchlist.

By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions

P:43 V: D:20161204 08:10:22