We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Register to chat with like-minded investors on our interactive forums.
| Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Stock Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Invinity Energy Systems Plc | IES | Aquis Stock Exchange | Ordinary Share |
| Price Change | Price Change % | Share Price | Last Trade | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.00 | 0.00% | 22.75 | 15:29:27 |
| Open Price | Low Price | High Price | Close Price | Previous Close |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 22.75 | 22.00 | 25.00 | 22.75 | 22.75 |
| Top Posts |
|---|
Posted at 02/5/2024 09:06 by yump There have been many years for any investors to figure out that any infrastructure investments featuring new technology take ages to develop successfully, if ever. Waste to energy, SAF etc etc.As such, not suitable for the majority of investors. It is nobody else’s fault if you bought in. What’s worse is that if you threw in the towel and sold at say 40p, the business suddenly looks like it might actually come to something. |
Posted at 01/5/2024 19:14 by megaman2 We are going to get some good press here in the UK market which is where most the pis are coming from..Surely it's going to create interest with new investors enticed by the government support and backing more grants etc. need to get the funding over the line then the advanced sales in a timely manner. Interesting to see what UK press it gets tomorrow as we need more UK investors to buy into this and this ukib certainly will help. |
Posted at 01/5/2024 17:27 by gbcol Yes, probably hoping talk of tier 1 investor would push share price a bit higher to strike this placing at a higher price. Rather underwhelming to say the least and they have probably shot any remaining credibility with existing shareholders but on the bright side this cash should finally see them through to launching mistral and to profitability.EDIT : might even persuade some of these strategic investors that were apparently queuing up to finally get involved |
Posted at 29/4/2024 14:19 by doctorbgreg Tradertrev - Of course I want this too. As do the board. As do all investors here. We roughly know the timeline this will happen assuming all goes to plan - estimated 2025.As an investor though, it's relatively clear to see that this company would not be selling at 25p if that was the case. I'm personally treating this as a buying opportunity as I think the probability of positive cash flow and big sales in the nearish future are worth the risk. |
Posted at 24/4/2024 19:50 by indiestu I hope it does come good. I merely offer an alternate view that the share price does not reflect any interest from strategic investors. If they were negotiating with multiple prospects it is difficult to believe that there would be no leaks and hence buying in the market. As the share price is falling there are only sellers. That is clear. In business there are yeses, nos and maybes. This is a maybe, that's why it is not progressing. Should there be no strategic investors the only remaining option is a fire sale. It's not that I don't take their word as honest in the RNS it is just that they have a history of making promises and not delivering. Same as all snake oil salesmen. |
Posted at 24/4/2024 19:06 by tom_w3 A few conclusions being drawn there. It has always been messaged that this is a strategic investors buy in (not retail). The last RNS heavily intimates that they have interested strategic investors queuing up and in the process of finalising. I'm going to take them on their word on that |
Posted at 17/4/2024 19:29 by megaman2 I disagree an investor is an entity that invests . Which can include a company and is the most likely inferred party here that's why the rns title has the word strategic investor in it...it's much more likely to be a company than someone with some dough...very slim chanceInstitutional and private investors are both investors for example ...the rns did not say private investor did it ..so why would you get to that conclusion when it's clearly about strategic investors and basic common sense says it will be a company that bring something to the party . It doesn't explicitly rule out an individual but it's a very long shot given the context . What do you think the binding agreements for ...???!!! |
Posted at 15/4/2024 14:31 by owenski No great detail presented in this RNS, 'progress being made, still weeks away' - 'IF' - it all goes well.But, could be good, only time will tell. Looks like they're outsourcing to a lot of their markets with an agreement to purchase the IP - cell stacks - directly from the company, this may or may not be a completed product in its own right as they stress in the previous Everdura announcement - that it'll utilise Invinity's supply chain, if so, then it sounds more like a 'handling charge' arrangement for some components with the donkey work of building the whole thing including cap ex costings for the rest of the VRB, being expended by the in country seller. Direct sales still retained in UK and US/Canadian markets by IES, which at this stage, there is insufficient detail on actual margins earned from an as yet to be launched Mistral product. Not enough detail on any of the financials on any of it, including what these investors are going to stump up in return for what exactly - equity stakes? - very likely, what kind of profitability will come to Invinity for making domestic supplied stuff or what royalty fees will look like for overseas builds is all unknown. Being as Mistral is not yet launched, I'd suggest it'll take time for any vendor to tool up to make the stuff anyway. The RNS sounds positive but is more of the same - 'progress being made', but still weeks away from the actual details. 'Cash flow' is likely to still be some time away, the business is likely to survive but the model is changing and not enough financial detail is known for the PI to make clear informed decisions beyond a guesswork punt. IES are always upbeat in presentations but behind the scenes they continue to run out of money and the uptake of VRB's in the manner promised to investors has yet to gain traction, there still seems to be a sales hiatus. Still no rush to buy into this. |
Posted at 03/4/2024 20:52 by hope1815 Sometimes just reading other posts in Linkin can throw some light on certain items.Ralph Anderson-Corporate Relations Manager at Invinity Energy Systems-Investor Relations, Communications (internal and external) and Marketing professional with over 10 years of sell-side and Capital Markets experience and with a broad range of investor relationships built up over many years. Following his Like linked posts can hint at other things |
Posted at 15/3/2024 07:44 by megaman2 It's the corrupt ceos and not the shorters that's the problem ..shorters are just a symptom of ramped share prices that many daft ramping individuals help cause ..novice investors roping in other novice investors ....it's always them to first shout shorters when their beloved stock falls often with no evidence or blame the market makers for their own ignorant investment..how often have you seen numpty investors claim.shorters and market makers to blame when actually the company is simply over valued ...often..If many of these director lifestyle companies are not shorted it will ultimately lead to investors losing more money as they will.just end up over priced and still fail... |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions
Hot Features
Premium
