We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Register for Free to get streaming real-time quotes, interactive charts, live options flow, and more.
| Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Stock Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Umc Energy | UEP | London | Ordinary Share |
| Price Change | Price Change % | Share Price | Last Trade
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.00 | 0.00% | 0.505 | 01:00:00 |
| Open Price | Low Price | High Price | Close Price | Previous Close |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.505 | 0.505 |
| Top Posts |
|---|
Posted at 13/4/2016 18:17 by linney3 The company has not ceased trading - It has delisted and will trade privately from now on. If an investor has shares and the company does amazing things then their shares have greater value and can be sold to another interested party or indeed sold if the company is sold on to anotherContent Film is an example - did nothing on AIM market but as soon as they went private things started to move in the direction |
Posted at 12/4/2016 18:23 by sideshowbull It has always moved like a stabbed rat.Sad really AIM madness again, a few great companies no volume what so ever and then the dogs get the headline pumps and poor junior investors get bummed. BWTFDIK sideshow |
Posted at 16/7/2014 10:40 by nazrat All very quiet here. I take it the offshore seismic evaluation is continuing and possible some 3D on the cards soon to pick the targets and get some spud dates for next year ? As for the onshore stuff it seems they only had to re-evaluate the data to pick targets so hope we will hear something soon. At the moment its sitting on low market cap in relation to its free carry in its licences and very under the radar of most investors. |
Posted at 03/5/2013 10:55 by ceohunter To view UMC Energy's presentation from last night's Proactive Investors One2One Investor Forum, click on the following link: |
Posted at 05/7/2007 08:16 by nghomi "IEAE expects several 5000 to 10000 tones depostis of Uranium metal depoists to be found in the basin"Vow, even if we found only 5000 tones of Uranium, we could be talking about $1.1B worth of Uranium!!!! I am only considering Uranium prices of $100 per pound!!!! Now if we consider three 5000 tones, then we would have $3.3B. I am surprised that UEP has not attracted any more investors after her recent positive update. I am IVK holder and IMHO the current interest of IVK in UEP could be potentially more valuable than IVK's today market cap! 20% of $3.3B would be at least £300m!!!! Which 7 times more than current market cap of IVK!!!! |
Posted at 25/6/2007 10:22 by marnewton I don't have a position...chart posted for a fellow investor.RSI (not shown) is overbought but can remain so for a considerable time in a strongly trending stock. Volume (not shown) suggests this latest move up has far more sponsorship than the last, in April, which was on very little volume. Resistance is...er obvious! (Some familiar names here;@) M By |
Posted at 14/4/2007 12:16 by hattori_hanzo I'm cautious by nature and rather than fall in love with my shares (as most investors tend to do) I tend to look first & foremost for the likely pitfalls & dangers associated with my investments. I've pondered the U308 story & have come to the conclusion that the U308 story has probably got a long way to run.Demand for nuclear energy is still growing at an ever increasing rate and demand is not likely to peak in the near future. It's this ever increasing demand that is the key, regardless of if the U308 price continues to rise. However, as well as cheap looking uranium stocks with potential, like UEP, VML, etc, I think it's important to have U308 producers & near term producers in any portfolio, like UUU/SXR & UMN, because they can take advantage of high prices now. I was early to the U308 story & I've done very well out of uranium stocks because I was ahead of the curve. But I also think the demand for energy is also a diversification story, so I think it's important to have other types of energy stocks in a balanced portfolio. It's important to identify sectors that are part of the energy story that may not be obvious or are out of fashion (eg: I was in SOLA at 104p). I've recently bought into 'Moly' stocks, like IMY, THR, MTT & QUA because they are part of the energy story too as they are used in steel AND nuclear energy production. I've already banked a near 2 bagger on IMY in 3 weeks & I've doubled my money on THR in a month. I have also recently increased my exposure to coal stocks which have been out of fashion recently but still have a big & ever increasing role to play in the energy story, despite what the carbon emissions lobby would have you believe. So, yes, U308 is still a big story, but it's not the only party in town. I also recommend some exposure to Moly, Coal, Platinum, Nickel, & chrome/ferro-chrome stocks (and I'm looking for some Zinc exposure too). It's also worth looking at solar & wind power, but that story has been discovered & it's harder to find value now. NB: Despite recently almost doubling my money on RIFT & making 55% on MXP, I'm not a big fan of oil & gas stocks. They lack visibility like no other sector & in my experience you have to be very selective indeed (and lucky) if you hope to consistently make any money. |
Posted at 08/4/2007 07:27 by scrooge mcduck no probs Jimbob,good to see Uranium stocks having a good run. I'm surprised how long UK investors took to catch on to the uranium story, but atleast they did in the end. $$$$$ |
Posted at 26/3/2007 19:29 by graylyn I think the year end was (End Jan 2007) so I suppose around May/June I think they could stretch it to the end of July, hope we get some sort of update before then, but stocks on AIM do tend to be a bit sloppy, having said that the Institutional Investors that we have on board will hopefully push for news.Take a look at RRR results just out, looks like an exciting year ahead! DYOR good luck. |
Posted at 26/2/2007 16:09 by hattori_hanzo It's better to have most of your money in producers (or very near term producers), imho. They can take advantage of high uranium prices now. By all means have a smaller holding in the likes of URA & UEP, etc, but all sensible investors must accept that it isn't necessarily a one way bet for those companies who are non producers now. Personally, I wouldn't buy URA now. It's risen around 800% from it's October low of .75p....which means you have an awful lot of people sitting on huge profits achieved in a very short period of time, if there's any big sell off in uranium stocks, it's likely to be the likes of URA that will get hammered hardest, imho. Even if there isn't a sector wide sell off, because there are so many people sitting on big profits, any big shake in URA (or, to a lesser degree, UMN) is likely to see bigger relative falls than other uranium stocks...in theory. UEP has a similar risk profile to URA, but does not have many people sitting on big profits, because, even after the rise in the last 2 weeks, the volumes are pitiful, so, in theory, it should see less selling in any big uranium sector sell off, although it's the producers, like UUU, who should see the least damage....again, in theory. Although I'm bullish on uranium stocks atm, it doesn't do any harm to sound a word of caution, especially after the collapse in certain commodity prices and stocks we saw last May. Big retracements can & do happen, even during longer term bull markets, infact, as any experienced investor or trader will tell you, severe, periodic retracements are a necessary & healthy part of any bull market. All imho, dyor, no investment advice intended, etc. |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions
Hot Features
Premium
