Zoo Digital Share Discussion Threads

[siwel100] 23/11/2006 11:42

cashmagnet...I have been but dont want to nudge the price anymore. Its so damned illiquid its difficult to accumulate. Am hoping we get some more diehards giving up the ghost before xmas.

[cashmagnet] 23/11/2006 11:36

BUY BUY BUY now or regret it, honestly you heard it hear first

[bodgit] 23/11/2006 11:36

Oh dear, same old same old.... Good luck all.

[cashmagnet] 23/11/2006 11:33

told ya on way up to £5, i know because..............?????????

[cashmagnet] 23/11/2006 11:14

i'm about 8 inch

[diamante] 23/11/2006 11:14

But if I sell, I'll do a Rob and zoo will be 0.00001p, if we're lucky, at Christmas.

[diamante] 23/11/2006 11:13

I'm long so the shareprice will be billions before Christmas.

[cashmagnet] 23/11/2006 11:11

£5 before christmas ;-)

[diamante] 23/11/2006 11:10

Yes Rob, I wrote those (I never go back and edit my posts, so there for all to see). Not sure of your point, all the posts of mine you've reproduced look very astute to me.

The reason I've changed my m,ind on zoo is because zoo today is not the zoo of yesterday. What I said about zoo before came to druition - investors did lose lots of money, for the reason I gave. Surprisingly, they survived (I thought they'd go bust). After drastic measures disposing of lots of stuff (imo, a condition of the fundraising), they raised cashed, cut costs, and focussed on a singlebusiness area with the potential for very high growth.

Everything I say id backed up with reasoning. Unlike you who, when you are long, ramp away (plug the billion dollar gap, disgusting) when short or sold out, come back to taunt, with no reasoning whatsoever. Lowlife.

Still, it doesn't matter. In the medium term, how zoo's business performs is all that matters, but along the way, it may expose some peoples true colours.

[rob008] 23/11/2006 11:03

siwel100 - I'm fine, I wasn't in Rage but a friend was. Off out now, got things to do.

[siwel100] 23/11/2006 11:00

R0B008....Still feeling bitter? The best time to vent your spleen is before a company restructures and refinances. Yep I agree that there is a risk, as always with microcaps. On the other hand its currently valued at half cash in bank, has a growing user base, 3 revenue streams and a windfall payment due in the Spring.Trading always carries a calculated risk, its understanding how to calculate it and when to buy/accumulate that seperates the 95% who lose money from the 5% who make it.
I see Diamante our phantom trader is still warbling on :)

[rob008] 23/11/2006 10:59

Pardon Diamante, didn't you write this about ZOO?

Diamante - 27 Jun'06 - 23:05 - 9599 of 9616


Harry, of course many innocent punters have been fleeced, but how much of it is their own stupid fault? How many supported banning anyone with any sense (ie those who warned about the cash flow, overexposed betters margin calls, and all the other obvious stuff) which was certain to push the price down to where it is now (and all the way to zilch, imo, unless a miracle happens). Talk about burying their head in the sand. I tried to tell them that banning sensible informed posts would just result in a warm, clubby feeling off the other rampers at a cost of losing all or most of their money. Any lessons learnt? Nope, probably not.

[diamante] 23/11/2006 10:53

How can posting about a company which went bust 3 or 4 years ago save me money? I know companies go bust, which is why thesedays I'm careful to make sure they are well funded and in no danger before I invest in them.

At least I, and everyone else, now knows explicitly that you are a ramper/slagger lowlife. So I'll treeat you as such.

[rob008] 23/11/2006 10:38

Thanks Diamante, here's the benefit of my experience to you on this thread, could save you and lots of others lots of money.

[diamante] 23/11/2006 10:33

Well Rob, I've just given the benefit of my experience to you on the Goo thread, could save you and lots of others lots of money.

[rob008] 23/11/2006 10:22

Diamante - GOO IS going to rocket in the next 2 or 3 weeks - enough said. I'm not ramping the stock, they are sitting on huge oil and gas finds in Peru and will release info. to that effect in the next 2 or 3 weeks.

Wrt this they fundamentally had a ground breaking technology in des and still have but the management failed to capitalise on it's huge potential a few years ago and instead they piled money into a yellow alien and Hothouse and both fell on their face. On that note you have to question the managements' credentials. They might be brilliant on a computer but do they have cutting edge business brains? That's the difference between success and failure. Until they register a profit I will remain a sceptic about their business plan.

Selling the interactive dvd part of the business in my eyes was the worse thing they have ever done. For instance they took out a seven year licence on WWTBAM and yet have flogged it with 3 years still to go - absolute madness!! This is exactly what I mean. They seem to spend all the investors money developing stuff and buying licences and then give it away for next to nothing.

[jacobjohn7] 23/11/2006 10:14

"Trouble is ROB, you dished out that "Billions" Hype back in December 2004. Now you're giving it loads in the opposite direction for Zoo prospects"

well said artey. Rob is one of the 'carrion' former holders/thread authors who are still here hanging about... ie: Him and Aero (who also likes to pop up now and again, and add his inane comments)

[diamante] 23/11/2006 09:35

Rob, please convince me you are not a lowlife like Sewage, Baxter, Chef, Punk, Mark etc - whio try to make a living by stupid ramping of illiquid microcaps, selling, shorting then deramping the same stock, then buying again and ramping, repeating for ever.

It doesn't work. Ask Bxter, Punk or Mark. Chefs riches from his claimed share successes means he can holiday at Butlins - (so just one step away from destitute, unlike the others).

[diamante] 23/11/2006 09:20

Rob £15m isn't multi billion.

They are forecast to make a profit this year on all those 25ps by the way.

If they sell just one more TAS or Regionalisation package than forecast, thenyou can add ay least £1/2m to forecasts - as the brokers say, this is really a put on a software sale. Since forecasts are only £0.5m anyway (ppe 5), one sale will double those forercasts. As Disney has shown, these are annual sales, and as Aph says, these sales get locked in due to the business processes the licencees change.

Most of your comments seem to refer to the past. If you hadn't noticed, New Zoo is nothing like Old Zoo. You have to assess it as a newly floated company, not extrapolate anything from the past.

You really don't add much to the discussion by telling us what we already know - Zoo have made a loss in the past, or that old holders have lost a lot of money, or that zoo would have liked a slice of dond, or that zoo have a new website a week after Aph had posted it, or even that DES will fulfill a billion pound gap, lol, or even that a tiny oil comapny is going to rocket. You can post what you want of course, but I sometimes wonder why.

Why not giove us some insight into what you think will happen to zoo this year and next? (something you can justify by some means or other). Or better still, answer my quesation I genuinely asked as to where I am going wrong in my previous bullish posts. I just think this is looking too good to be true - the fundamentals based on what I see make zoo look rediculously cheap to me (and I've stated the reasons why I think that previously).

[artey] 23/11/2006 09:20

Trouble is ROB, you dished out that "Billions" Hype back in December 2004. Now you're giving it loads in the opposite direction for Zoo prospects