![](/cdn/assets/images/search/clock.png)
We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Worthington Group Plc | LSE:WRN | London | Ordinary Share | GB00B01YQ796 | ORD 10P |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.00 | 0.00% | 87.00 | - | 0.00 | 01:00:00 |
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 0 | N/A | 0 |
Date | Subject | Author | Discuss |
---|---|---|---|
03/2/2020 15:51 | We don't need you either because you strangely never want to discuss... On a discussion thread pmsl | ![]() knigel | |
03/2/2020 15:03 | I see the independent observer is now a lecturer on LSE, that's good we don't need him on here. | ![]() jjw fan club | |
03/2/2020 14:57 | Defamation on internet bulletin boards is more like slander than libel, a High Court judge has ruled. Mr Justice Eady said that bulletin board discussions are characterised by "give and take" and should be considered in that context... Mr Justice Eady said that Smith had persistently pursued cases which were without merit and issued a civil restraint order against him, barring him from starting further actions. He later conceded that he could not do that, though, because he had stopped lawyers arguing about a civil restraint order in the course of the trial. He did, though, order the continuation of a general stay on those cases which had already been begun. The posters on the bulletin boards had criticised Smith for what they saw as heavy-handed behaviour and the issuing of threats of legal action by Smith when criticised. One said that he supported "those who were being threatened and bullied by … Mr Smith", and called Smith a bulletin board bully. | ![]() sweet karolina2 | |
03/2/2020 14:34 | Lol Woybore nah Soz in a word Wong lol | ![]() dynamitedazza | |
03/2/2020 14:06 | realistically, though, the FCA is a paper tiger? - its record of bring successful prosecutions in cases of alleged complex fraud etc is very poor. all that’s happening on lse is a single pi who has lost out is complaining, whilst another poster who claims to be running free on both WRN & whetstone is posting updates from rapid. remarkably few posters on lse have commented on that recent news that GSC was quietly offloading in march. | ![]() spikeyj | |
03/2/2020 13:58 | The impending FCA report seems to have stirred the spoilers into action here and on LSE. | ![]() roydyor | |
03/2/2020 13:52 | The fact SK is here daily spells out he is worried Very worried indeed ! Well SK baby u need to be my dad old lonely man 😘 | ![]() dynamitedazza | |
03/2/2020 13:39 | Yeh Knigel filter SK says so as he is the new Lawyer on the block lol Good help you all You are all doomed - doomed Big Time | ![]() dynamitedazza | |
03/2/2020 11:36 | Knigel, Threats of legal action against posters are very common. None have been successfully sued. Most claimants back out before a claim is even filed, the very few that have been filed have resulted in failure and significant cost for the plaintiff - see the multiple threats made against TW for example. Do you or anyone else really think if a genuine action was being prepared with genuine legal advice a sociopathic criminal like Chapman would be allowed to go around posting about it and making threats regarding other forms of harassment and intimidation he intends to subject defendants to? As has been fully explained any attempted claim would be fatally flawed in every possible way. The best thing to do is simply to filter posters making ludicrous and interminable threats about litigation which just ain't gonna happen. | ![]() sweet karolina2 | |
03/2/2020 09:22 | Check and Woy making out he has me in filter lol | ![]() dynamitedazza | |
03/2/2020 09:13 | Strange that Chapman, the hot air balloon, was so keen to have a litigation thread but now there is one he tries to trash it. It was the same when a thread for WHET was started, he and the team shills were not interested, nor were the shareholders come to that. | ![]() roydyor | |
03/2/2020 08:36 | The hot air balloon is in full flow I see, they must really hate anyone talking about their dealings! If so they should have stuck to their small companies and avoided WRN and the BB following. If he gives any links to litigation against Stevenson, TW, Green or Ahmad will someone please post it again for me to see. | ![]() roydyor | |
03/2/2020 08:05 | Knigel make you Wong it has focussed all minds on litigation Which is what we are looking forward too All the other stuff is in hand IMO me thinks 😉 | ![]() dynamitedazza | |
03/2/2020 08:03 | Melt down from SK more like lol We will see big boy - what u worried about SK stand up and Be counted if you think your right Lol typical coward no balls SK The trainee lawyer lol God help them 😂😂 😂😂 | ![]() dynamitedazza | |
03/2/2020 07:41 | I really fail to understand how anyone can be sued "millions" for posting on a public BB thread - like thousands of others - especially on two suspended shares. I read similar on other threads - unjustified ramps or negitive comments - no one ever gets the threat of legal action - so why here? He really should Google online harassment law for a start. They have had five years to press for litigation against various parties. None has happen. I do wonder why they want to shut down debate here ...because so far it's having the opposite effect! | ![]() knigel | |
03/2/2020 07:33 | MELTDOWN! Disclosure rules require any info harmful to the case to be disclosed. If it is ex parte, ie a pathetic attempt to ID people, that disclosure has to be up front in the claim or the claim will be kicked out when the court becomes aware of it - Ie exactly what happened with AE's ex parte injunction against TW back in 2015. | ![]() sweet karolina2 | |
03/2/2020 07:31 | LITIGATION UPDATE SO CAMPERS WHAT DID WE LEARN LAST WEEK WE LEARNT THAT THE TROLLS IN PARTICULAR WOYBORE AS USUAL WAS WONG THEY/HIM WAS DESPERATE TO TALK HIS/THEIR USUAL TOSH AND TRY TO CONVINCE READRRS THAT ALL LITIGATION WAS “OUT OF TIME” WELL WE KNOW ALL KNOW THAT NO LITIGATION IS OUT OF TIME AS WAS EXPLAINED IN MY LAST WEEKS POSTS | ![]() dynamitedazza | |
03/2/2020 04:02 | Some one pls post the above on the other site many thanks 😘 | ![]() dynamitedazza |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions