Versarien Share Discussion Threads

[laginaneil] 24/11/2024 09:15

Difficulties for another 'graphene' company..



Lot of info on web about 'Daniel Stolyarov and Elena Polyakova. ' but can't see quickly what legal
fight is about.

Some history..

[kemche] 23/11/2024 16:22

Cronk - never underestimate the stupidity of the Rogers collective to pony up yet more money. Mensa
ready on standby.

[the cronk] 23/11/2024 14:22

Kemche,

Good questions and there's no reply of course!!

There are so many lifestyle companies killing AIM now, it's hard to believe they can find a new batch of gullibles to buy each placing.

[middleeast] 23/11/2024 13:26

BRISTOL BUS TRIP!

[middleeast] 23/11/2024 13:23

HEY GRAHAM! (SuperG)

[middleeast] 23/11/2024 13:21

CROWDFUNDING!

[middleeast] 23/11/2024 13:18

In no particular order the words~

EVISCERATE!

[festario] 22/11/2024 12:34

Dean Haigh is a convicted stalker. In police custody on several occasions.

Filtered

[supernumerary] 22/11/2024 11:53

Chris Leigh's still making a profit!

[bbmsionlypostafter mk2] 22/11/2024 10:33

Now the market cap is only about 1.25M why hasn't either Ricketts or senior mgmt bought it & gone private?

[festario] 22/11/2024 10:04

Schooling you, that's for sure.

[squire007] 22/11/2024 09:38

So WTF are you doing here still and dont say saving us all ffs :-))

[festario] 22/11/2024 08:42

What company? I see no company here, certainly not a business by any stretch of the imagination.

[zydecoco] 22/11/2024 08:33

PW73,"If the company knows it's going into administration imminently (as some here suggest) it would have to notify the court before a new hearing date is set."It "should" notify the court is more accurate. It may not necessarily do so. Therefore it does not mean the company is not going into administration.

[pandar] 22/11/2024 08:20

FXL5
Good point :-)

[fireball xl5] 22/11/2024 08:06

You don't have to have a problem, don't reply. It's pretty easy for most to understand.

[pandar] 22/11/2024 07:44

Your post said that it "meant" the co. wouldn't be in admin, not that the directors don't "anticipate" this outcome
Two rather different meanings, don't you agree?

That's the problem I have with your comment

[pwhite73] 21/11/2024 23:34

I'm not quite sure what the issue is with my comment. If the company knows its going into administration imminently (as some here suggest) it would have to notify the court before a new hearing date is set. Once administrators are appointed NR's claim for compensation due to unfair dismal or loss of earnings would rank behind the secured creditors like Innovate UK and Santander. The hearing wouldn't go ahead because once in administration the directors are relieved of their executive duties and the administrators appointed by the High Court are in control of the company.

That a date has been set for 23/04/2025 suggests the directors do not anticipate the company will be in administration any time soon. How difficult is that to understand?

[snaffleclamp] 21/11/2024 17:37

I’m sure the Registrar did a full Audit of VRS before setting the date 👀