Versarien Share Discussion Threads

[snaffleclamp] 12/4/2023 17:52

Actually that youtube vid is worth watching.

It explains why CVD made Graphene is too expensive and it can
now be made much cheaper and easier...etc

WOW.. great load test results - considering how basic and simple!

[snaffleclamp] 12/4/2023 17:32

Sod it, just buy some baking soda

[snaffleclamp] 12/4/2023 17:28

Make your own Graphene, (in your garage) the easy way!

[festario] 12/4/2023 17:22

Do my eyes deceive me, or is that yet ANOTHER all time low? Congratulations to all you Neil Ricketts and SuperG acolytes, where are they now to account for YOUR sickening losses?

[kemche] 12/4/2023 16:07

"Selling off a business with £6M revenues on a conservative x0.5 to x1 revenue multiplier will raise more than any placing (or higher - maybe up to x2 historic multiplier could be achieved but I doubt this would be possible in the current economic climate)."

Sparky knows what he's talking about.

"And why the one-dimensional thinking on placings as being the only option"

Possibly because they have form perhaps?

[cotswoldsparky] 12/4/2023 15:28

Arrogance, gicater? A bit harsh. Most of us want discussion, not the same thing posted several times a day. Even bones...see how he responds to somebody on an AGL thread (where he owns shares) and doesn't want to listen to a repetitive opposing view...

bones698 5 Apr '23 - 16:29 - #18905

"I'm all for a reasonable debate but your tactics are obvious and have little or no facts to back them up . I'll put you on filter as no point wasting anymore time with you. I hope there's and RNs soon (sic) to catch you and your shorter mates out . Be nice to see to disappear and the more sensible posters return."

"little or no facts", bit like many of the posts on here
"I'll put you on filter" - does that make bones arrogant?

Negative is fine, but endless repetitive statements with "little or no facts to back them up" are just tedious and boring.

It's why I, like many others, don't really bother with ADVFN any more and only dip in occasionally.

BTW, on the subject of "being right" didn't bones claim we were going to see admin before the FY accounts were published? How did that prediction go?

And why the one-dimensional thinking on placings as being the only option when the company have said they are looking to raise cash by selling off the mature businesses (something I predicted, BTW😉).

Selling off a business with £6M revenues on a conservative x0.5 to x1 revenue multiplier will raise more than any placing (or higher - maybe up to x2 historic multiplier could be achieved but I doubt this would be possible in the current economic climate).

CS

[laginaneil] 12/4/2023 15:02

The wait is on for graphene to replace silicon...

[laginaneil] 12/4/2023 14:50

A bit of graphene news:



short link:

[tmoon] 12/4/2023 14:37

Not arrogance Gicater just get fed up with oh so smug posters telling us what fools we were for investing and how clever they were not to. Why on earth they infest boards such as this when they have no interest in the Company is beyond me.

[sloppyjoe2] 12/4/2023 13:56

Wouldn't hold your breath...

[andymoore07] 12/4/2023 13:52

I hope to goodness we're a part of this?!

[gicater] 12/4/2023 13:51

tmoon12 Apr '23 - 12:33 - 146855 of 146856
0 8 0
Thanks bones698 that tells me all I needed to know. FILTERED.

tmoon - where on earth do you get the arrogance to make such a comment?
This stock has been a disaster for you.
Is your problem with this particular poster or is it with anyone who is negative on VRS?

[tmoon] 12/4/2023 12:33

Thanks bones698 that tells me all I needed to know. FILTERED.

[bones698] 12/4/2023 12:28

Tmoon no I'm not that stupid. I posted here over a year ago saying this would happen and the shareprice would crash due to funding issues and lack of cash . Please look back to see that I have called this one right all along . Like always you need to be careful listening to rampers asntey can't see what's really happening when they own shares in a company .
That would mean they got it badly wrong and they won't admit that even when the truth is obvious for others to see .

Also take a look at what happened at nano and my posts there regarding the settlement yet holders were expecting 500m plus .

These boards are full of people who don't have a clue ,usually the rampers

[terminator101] 12/4/2023 11:09

No it wont mate. It will sink like the titanic never to be seen again.

[tmoon] 12/4/2023 10:08

bones698.
May I ask whether or not you own any shares in vrs?

[story teller] 12/4/2023 09:58

#BBM

Is this you?

Olive oil, Kleenex tissues and your fizzog in the latest s/prophets release.

Suits you sir!

[alchemy] 12/4/2023 09:44

And some cement biggie joins in

[alchemy] 12/4/2023 09:44

Yes to your view but only if the revenue from textiles isn't inexorably rising to the opex cash rate .

[squire007] 12/4/2023 09:24

I see some grants landing and a raise at 5p minimum :-0

[cardzeus] 12/4/2023 08:56

A spin-out company from the graphene innovation ecosystem at The University of Manchester has formed an international partnership that will spearhead an unprecedented scale-up of graphene-based technologies intended “to make a substantial impact on global CO2 emissions”.

UK-based Graphene Innovations Manchester Ltd (GIM), founded by University graduate Dr Vivek Koncherry, has signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) with Quazar Investment Company to create a new company in the UAE. This exciting UK-UAE partnership - which highlights potential opportunity for UK innovators to access global investment and international markets and supply chains - will be one of the most ambitious projects to date to commercialise graphene as it fast-tracks cutting-edge R&D into large-scale manufacture – an investment vision worth a total of $1billion.

[volsung] 12/4/2023 07:38

VRS will bloom again like the White Rose of Athens