Versarien Share Discussion Threads

[shavian] 22/2/2018 08:13

Have you noticed that Dr Chris Crockford is the same Crockford who in a previous life was Business Development Director of a F1 team - yes, McLaren. Funny thing, that. What goes around, comes around, just like a Nanene-enhanced McLaren F1 car

[chumbo1] 22/2/2018 08:12

Nanink is available I notice

[woodpeckers] 22/2/2018 08:10

Deleted. Apologies.

[eel tamer] 22/2/2018 07:59

That application has both the singular and the plural.

[woodpeckers] 22/2/2018 07:58

So from that do we presume they have got both Graphink and Graphinks? Both seem to have been registered on the same day.

[redstone64] 22/2/2018 07:54

https://trademarks.ipo.gov.uk/ipo-tmcase/page/Results/1/UK00003286966

[woodpeckers] 22/2/2018 07:51

My thoughts entirely grabster and the 'Nan' addition would link the company to it because of our Nanene and as such give it more credability than other 'graphene' inks...

[superg1] 22/2/2018 07:51

Grabster

There are only 2 or 3 that are near term. Boron which is an electrical insulator and Molybdenum Disulphide.

[grabster] 22/2/2018 07:45

- but graphene is merely one of the nano-ingredients the company is likely to eventually be using in its inks. A name that accommodates various nano materials would make much more sense.

[superg1] 22/2/2018 07:37

It is nice and simple basically saying graphene inks. I'm surprised it is still available.

[woodpeckers] 22/2/2018 07:30

Still think it should be Nanink. If Nanene is going to be the go to for real Graphene, Nanink should be the ink version... never mind, you're doing a good job otherwise Neill, so I won't sell my holding just because of one minor slip up.. ;)

[shavian] 22/2/2018 07:22

Aha SG1 -as mysterious and cryptic as ever:

So- SNOT HIGRAPHINK, SGRAPHINK.

I can write crossword clues too, you know

[shavian] 22/2/2018 07:16

Interesting:

[the stigologist] 22/2/2018 07:16

Good grief. Can we stop posting rubbish like that please? Bot generated nonsense.

[shavian] 22/2/2018 07:08

I thought I saw somewhere that Cambridge had already chosen the name HIGRAPHINK? I do think the simpler “Graphink̶1; sounds better, though

[superg1] 22/2/2018 07:01

If it has name then a launch will follow at some point.

[grabster] 22/2/2018 06:53

TA analysts are noticing the grim state of rival AGM:

[shavian] 22/2/2018 06:51

From such small acorns mighty oak trees grow

This lot?

[grabster] 22/2/2018 06:49

TA analysts are now noticing the alarm bells at AGM:

[master rsi] 22/2/2018 00:05

re - Medical dressings - podcast today

Some points about RNS company
from LSE.....

- they are only at the planning stage of the trial and so we are probably at least 6, if not 12 months, away from it completing, and only after that will they get into looking at a commercial product (assuming the trial is successful)

- the enabling Partner (Digital & Future Technologies Ltd) are only a very small company, probably a one man band, with a turnover of less than £250k (I've looked at them on Companies House before stating this)

[luckyorange] 21/2/2018 23:01

rogerbridge - 17 Sep 2017 - 10:43:51 - 6738 of 21932 Versarien Developing advanced materials and enabling engineering exploitation - VRS
Interesting posts SG. Nice and warm here in Gran Canadian. I throw a name into the hat , though I like your choice.
I will keep it simple Graphink.

Vasilis - 18 Apr 2017 - 10:07:45 - 3578 of 21932 Versarien Developing advanced materials and enabling engineering exploitation - VRS
SG - Who says slavery has been abolished? I wonder what the Romans would have made of whole armies of company workers on 'zero hours contracts' :-)

Seriously, on the inks front, I am pleased that Neill has the trademarks issue in hand. If we can get Nanene and 'Graphink' (?) in place as our two principle offerings - with people and resources in place - plus websites up to speed - we will undoubtedly be in a better place in my view.