Velocys Share Discussion Threads

[kirk 6] 09/5/2018 15:28

Come on donald

[cpap man] 09/5/2018 15:20

North American buyers of VLS active again this afternoon!

[kirk 6] 09/5/2018 15:19

Zak Mir have this 30p this month lol and not that long left. 100% rise from here easily achieved in the next 3 weeks

[cpap man] 09/5/2018 15:10

Great looking chart at VLS with the GAP now being filled

Can see VLS in the relatively short term going up to 40p+

[cpap man] 09/5/2018 15:09

Analyst Price targets for VLS

Numis 35p 'Buy'

Canaccord Genuity 40p 'Speculative Buy'



These share price targets for VLS targets are likely to be revised upwards in the context of the very positive announcement on 4/5/2018 that VLS has received a "notice to proceed" action to commence manufacturing a biorefinery for Red Rock Biofuels in Oregon, and received a $6 million down payment (with the project expected to deliver $15 million revenues to VLS during the construction and early operation stages, and an additional $30 million or more over the project life).

[cpap man] 09/5/2018 15:03

Beam me up Scotty

[arf dysg] 09/5/2018 15:01

kirk 6 (1644) "There are roomers flying round"

Is that some kind of winged kangaroo?

[kirk 6] 09/5/2018 14:10

First gap fill 32p as I have always said!

[ironswi] 09/5/2018 13:09

Guys if you see my comments yesterday I said FY results this month anytime.It looks like this week or early next week we could hit preliminary FY 2017 results and that would be a boost for vls

[trinko] 09/5/2018 13:07

Bought yesterday and today and holding them now . Good luck every one

[jimmyhoffa262] 09/5/2018 12:57

Something big brewing some know and as they spread word others are buying in

[jace86] 09/5/2018 12:56

Hopefully. The more that people hold onto their stock too with the potential it has the faster it will fly with every buy!

[kirk 6] 09/5/2018 12:54

About to break 20p chaps

[woolybanana] 09/5/2018 11:51

Interesting that the uneconomical small pockets of gas have come back into play again, just as there is a suggestion that there could be a world shortage of gas in a handful of years.

[jimmyhoffa262] 09/5/2018 11:49

Loads of 50k buys

[kirk 6] 09/5/2018 11:12

English that's really good news isn't it??

[gac141] 09/5/2018 10:59

Can we keep the tone down please.

[jimmyhoffa262] 09/5/2018 09:46

Ha ha cpap but looking better now

[cpap man] 09/5/2018 09:02

Er leave the wife alone mate!

[englishlongbow] 09/5/2018 07:57

28/9/2017



Changing the scale

Earlier this year, developer Velocys and a consortium of utility and engineering investors started the world’s first commercial small-scale (less than 1500 b/d) GtL project plant at Oklahoma City in the US. Instead of giant Fischer-Troupe (FT) reactors, it uses modular ‘micro-channel’ FT reactors, which appear to be more reliable and manageable. The project is making a combination of waxes and fuels, with the emphasis on waxes to capture their higher returns.

The target feedstock market is small pockets of gas that can be sourced at very low or preferably negative prices. The first plant in Oklahoma City will use a mixture of landfill gas and natural gas from the grid as feedstock. According to Zeus Intelligence, with natural gas at $3.89/MMBtu, the plant will be able to produce diesel for $1.57/gallon or $65.94/bl. But the landfill gas comes free, after cleaning and conditioning cost, and the fuels it produces are expected to qualify under the Renewable Fuels Standard - adding as much as $1.70 per gallon in value in the US, and another $0.80 or so in California owing to Low Carbon Fuel credits. This means using landfill gas produces a significant additional revenue stream, rather than a cost. The group plans many more similar projects with standardized modular plants that are economic and easy to ship.

Velocys' main competitor is UK-based CompactGTL, led by Ex-BP chief, Tony Hayward. Both companies are also targeting associated gas feedstock from oil fields that would otherwise be uneconomic to develop – which again implies a negative price for the gas. There are many oil fields where there is no viable market for the associated gas, reinjecting is too expensive, and flaring or venting has become politically unacceptable. Costs can be further reduced by mixing the waxy synthetic crude oil output from the FT reactor with the crude oil stream, rather than refining into oil products.

[jimmyhoffa262] 09/5/2018 07:39

IndiestuThanks for your Input but I think I'll stay here.

[indiestu] 08/5/2018 22:41

Should off bought Nano. Get it in the morning.