Vast Resources Share Discussion Threads

[gold finger 1] 24/2/2024 12:50

OfficerDigby

The new deferred shares have no economic value stated essentially 3 times in the RNS.

Well there you go then. Not sure what your worried about. They have no economic value.
As you say they they made that clear 3 times in the RNS.
So why even add them. Anyone who is holding on the date of consolidation will get them. If you dont hold, What are you worried about.

They may not hold any economic value as a share. but at the end of the day, everything has a value allotted to it. Lets say i buy a bag of chips. i eat some and throw the rest away, they now have no economic value. But to someone who has nothing, and is starving, they have a value.

If they are not costing me anything, and they are giving them to me. I will take them.

[bionicdog] 24/2/2024 12:19

You are wasting your breath , he doesn't buy any shares as he is a company shill trying to trick others into doing so.

[officerdigby] 24/2/2024 11:58

gold finger 124 Feb '24 - 09:13 - 22485 of 22490
0 1 1

Now someone said why had i increased my holding when its clear that another placing is coming. Well you see, I, like jones, know at some point these Deferred Shares will be worth having. If people think differently, no one is forcing you to buy.

GF,

From RNS:

On the same assumption, the Resolution will also result in 515,892,976 New Deferred Shares of £0.009 (0.9p) each which shall rank pari passu with the 3,206,616,509 Existing Deferred Shares. As stated these shares have no economic value.

------
the new deferred shares have no economic value stated essentially 3 times in the RNS.

Even if they did they will rank pari passu with the other pre-existing >3bln deferred shares.

So either they have no economic value - or they will be part of some elaborate scheme, where some money got to them? In which case the other 3bln deferred shares will also 'feel' the postulated benefit - the detriment of the ordinary share holders.

Do you also hold the old deferred shares then? Which I guess are some residue from a privies consolidation?

Any such attempt would then go to court as would be against legally binding statements in RNS's

[orkneyarab] 24/2/2024 11:03

Charity thief PATT is a champion for the only share in the world that's performed worse than this one. Quite the achievement.

[kemche] 24/2/2024 09:25

PATT - filtered!

[purchaseatthetop] 24/2/2024 09:16

I suggest you filter yourself as well GF.

[gold finger 1] 24/2/2024 09:15

Looks like Dog is having problems sleeping again. LOL.

[bionicdog] 24/2/2024 00:02

You are welcome MF. The morons only have a fraction of their money left , but they have their emojis.

[markfrankie] 23/2/2024 22:47

Thanks for the graph bionic dog... I remember the late 2012 to early 2013 rise, i Road that one, was that when they lost their nomad? I rode that one too, bionic thanks for the warning last year when I was toying with a little gamble here, I was tempted as I've been luck a couple of times, but thank you

[hopeful25] 23/2/2024 20:55

😂😂😂

[bionicdog] 23/2/2024 20:45

For the 96th time! Are you saying that he is party to inside information? If so , he will be prosecuted.

[kemche] 23/2/2024 20:44

iaf, have you heard anything from your highly placed sources?

[bionictroller] 23/2/2024 20:43

Diamonds very very close

[iceagefarmer] 23/2/2024 19:44

why would jones buy another 100m if vast wasnt going to get the diamonds back..its obvious diamonds are coming home

[iceagefarmer] 23/2/2024 19:03

jones acquired another 100m shares

Mr. David Ian Jones 5.10% 284,307,839

[hopeful25] 23/2/2024 18:52

🐕 Are you actually invested in Vast,if not wtf are you doing on this board and wtf has any information given on this board got anything to do with you!!!! Get Lost on Angus Ukog and plenty of others no doubt!!!!!!!!Mind your own bloody business!!!!

[gold finger 1] 23/2/2024 18:49

well i called it wrong today saying it would close up about 15%. Out by 1.19%.
I was surprised that they opened up at 0.07p though.
Seems the MMs decides they were not going to make it easy for the buyer/seller to make money as easy today. That was clear from the start. If you want to buy back, what you sold, you will have to pay more. AIMO.

[bionicdog] 23/2/2024 18:44

That's because you're a company shill. You don't care about the holders , you only want to fill them with disinformation.

"Accordingly, the Directors unanimously recommend that Shareholders vote in favour of the Resolution to be proposed at the General Meeting, as they intend to do in respect of their aggregate interests of 20,166,385 Existing Ordinary Shares (representing approximately .037% of the Existing Ordinary Shares of the Company)."

Wow , just wow.

[gold finger 1] 23/2/2024 18:30

I have to say its hard to have any sympathy for holders that that sold at a loss.
I have just seen the tweet vast put out on x. The brain dead out there saying its just a ramp. That holders should vote no at the GM. Well if anyone did that you would be as mad as them. They want the vote no for one reason , for you and any holder to feel the pain they feel for selling. No holder would have encouraged them to sell. When this explodes north they need to remember who it was who encouraged them to sell. Then turn into the troll they hated when they held.

[bionicdog] 23/2/2024 17:11

Anyone going to the GM?

[shortsqueezer] 23/2/2024 17:07

Poor volume today. Not too many got spiked. Running out of lemmings.....sorry, buyers it would seem.