ADVFN Logo ADVFN

We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.

Trending Now

Toplists

It looks like you aren't logged in.
Click the button below to log in and view your recent history.

Hot Features

Registration Strip Icon for alerts Register for real-time alerts, custom portfolio, and market movers

TRIN Trinity Exploration & Production Plc

53.00
1.00 (1.92%)
26 Jul 2024 - Closed
Delayed by 15 minutes
Trinity Exploration & Pr... Investors - TRIN

Trinity Exploration & Pr... Investors - TRIN

Share Name Share Symbol Market Stock Type
Trinity Exploration & Production Plc TRIN London Ordinary Share
  Price Change Price Change % Share Price Last Trade
1.00 1.92% 53.00 15:33:31
Open Price Low Price High Price Close Price Previous Close
53.00 52.50 53.00 53.00 52.00
more quote information »
Industry Sector
OIL & GAS PRODUCERS

Top Investor Posts

Top Posts
Posted at 26/7/2024 12:22 by aqc888
My break even is 69.5p. I think there’s a reason large oil companies have left and the Trinidad government has suddenly decided to reduce taxes and become helpful… because they know it’s a difficult and risky business drilling in Trinidad. It’s a poor region to invest in my opinion. A private operator will make a good living from Trinity, I don’t see txp ever making decent reliable returns for investors. An exit at 68p with hopefully a few further bids would be ideal
Posted at 14/6/2024 19:49 by aqc888
I get the impression that Galeota isn’t very saleable. With Galeota being Trinity’s most important asset it makes sense exploiting this with TXP.

Anyone interested in Galeota would have approached Trinity by now? Nafafa, your approach is a very safe and conservative one. Many investors in Trinity however probably have a higher risk appetite..

It all comes down to viewpoints of the competence of TXP to exploit value and succeed.
Posted at 14/6/2024 11:08 by nafafa
Flyinghorse, a very sound observation. Past experience has been to over promise and underdeliver! Based on their current share price performance, investors clearly do not have a great deal of confidence in TXP.The deal to acquire Trin is valued at shy of £18 million (.31*1.5 *38,000,000), and a substantial element of that is cash in the bank. I will reiterate, in my view, if Trin directors were to be instructed to solely focus on bass production, even allowing for a decline to 2,000 barrels per day, then £8 million a year could comfortably be returned to shareholders. That is an equivalent dividend of 20p per share, and of course there is the cash that could be distributed immediately. There would also be a huge savings in overhead to be achieved by kicking out those not directly employed in activities focused on delivery and sustaining base production and possible sale of non developed assets.Why would any shareholder in their right minds vote for this deal? It seems that many holders have all too easily been seduced by a baseless hope that TXP will deliver for them. In my view, a high risk and illogical gamble.
Posted at 12/6/2024 09:27 by pavey ark
Touching that you think the "worth" of a company is reflected in the value set by AIM investors.....especially "small oil" investors.

I can assure you I would be more than delighted if your dream scenario turns out to be correct but if you look past a few selected posts you will see that most TXP posters share my scepticism regarding management and their ability to deliver.....frying pan/fire for TRIN investors !!!???

Until TXP and their management come good (and it has been a long and expensive wait for their shareholders)then this is a risk for TRIN shareholders......running TRIN for cash is not a risky option....regardless of the share price.

If as you say some TXP shareholders are against this deal then it rather proves my point about AIM small oil investors.
Posted at 15/4/2024 08:27 by ashkv
Bummed for the long term investors - I have been in the past an investor in TRIN for two extended periods. The first dip was a very profitable investment.

The second go - I thankfully got out at a small profit in what was prior the 10s for TRIN.

Jeremy B - the CEO has to go!!!

Overpaid, misleading communications, poor strategy - WHATEVER HAPPENED TO THE HORIZONTAL WELL THAT LONG LEAD ITEMS HAD BEEN ORDERED AND WAS SUPPOSED TO INCREASE PRODUCTION CIRCA 200 Boe/d??? (as I recall/please correct)

Also poor hiring by the CEO - if I recall TRIN hired in 2022/2023 an exploration Director working in Asia - who has proven to be absolutely incompetent!!!

TRIN should undertake a manner of BLVN strategy - fire most of management / high admin costs and squeeze the profitable assets / return cash to investors in the form of buybacks and dividends!!!

Rest is a waste!!!
Posted at 13/4/2024 18:12 by nocents
I think the bottom line is that Trinity is low profile and in AIM. Institutional investors are not interested, and Trin shot themselves severely in the foot with Jacobin. They lost the confidence of the private investor and the mm’s just slumped it as they do. I don’t think many people except us have a clue about the nuts and bolts of the company. Most people just want a quick profit asap and out, thank you very much. They probably don’t understand SPT, no hedging, discounted price etc. Even Cavendish think Trin will pay no spt at all in 2024, but I think they may. This quarter is already averaging $76.5. And oil is holding up. Last year had no hedging too but the money was squandered.
Trin need to increase bopd and investor trust. And the dividend. And sell assets in Galeota. Unfortunately management have not shown the greatest competence since BD died . This has wrecked the share price.
I think the big shareholders will have made their feelings known. Newlands owns over 10%. Trin should be marketing Galeota( Perenco are next door), increaing the dividend as promised, and explaining what( if anything) they have learned from Jacobin. The update in about 10 days may be a flop ( Q1 usually is) but ought not to be. No SPT. Decent profit. No capex.
Let’s see if they manage to shoot the other foot or not. Disgrace if they do.
40p( 4p old money) is well below the all-time low in Covid of 55p(5.5p).
I fear a year stuck in the Sargasso with no wind in our sails, but it all comes down to management competence and care. The big holders need to know the plan or should be proactive and move management out if it does not happen. Not yet though. See what 10 days bring. Have no expectations. But the ground is solid and assets plentiful. But this is Trin and it is in AIM. Grab and run index.
Posted at 15/3/2024 23:19 by arlington chetwynd talbott
Had a quick look at the nominee point. It can be done, as this passage suggests:

Investors holding through intermediaries are not considered for the purposes of the Companies Act to be members of a company. This means that a number of shareholder rights (including requisition rights) are only exercisable by the CREST member. For investors to exercise these rights they must be enfranchised in some capacity by the CREST member.”

Obviously this all adds to the workload (but still totally worth it). The quote is from p.16 of this helpful guide:
Posted at 25/2/2024 17:59 by nocents
Fully agree with all of that.
And I think the last bit is also very salient. That time may come.
( The only bit I disagree with is that every investor knows a horror story re. Unscrupulous investors. I would say many many do not, and we can’t know every investor.or whether they know the horror stories. Many will still not. not. I certainly didn’t and fell for them. Many are , I am sure, still as naive as I was.
We can’t know every investor anyway and certainly not whether they know this or not. , Too many certainly, but Certainly can’t be everyone ‘cos we can’t know everyone anyway!!
Apologies for being picky Andrew. .It is an often Irritating trait which I know I have. There will sadly still be many investors iblivious of the unscrupulous directors and their recent rip-offs.
Agree fully with all else you say re. the large shareholders. The stability offered by their presence is crucial and highly noteworthy.
Posted at 11/1/2024 19:01 by kenmitch
nocents.

I’m genuinely sorry about your predicament and to read that your near 70% TRIN loss has so obviously hurt you badly.

My key point though was about so many private investors making the mistake of not selling as soon as there’s bad news. And another terrible mistake is investing more than we can afford to lose.

I’m NOT suggesting you or anyone else should sell TRIN now. That’s after very big share price fall instead of cutting a modest quick small loss far far higher. Once the share does fall so far selling is much riskier because there’s a chance of a bid or change of management etc. Or simply the risk of selling at the bottom. But it’s so wrong and so easily avoidable from getting in to that pickle.

There are so many quality alternative shares to go for both in the oil sector and elsewhere. We soon forget our small loss (as I did the 10% TRIN loss at 80pish)if buying much better alternatives that don’t consistently let their investors down as TRIN has. There’s a far higher chance of winning and recovering previous small loss taken, with better quality and better run alternatives than by persisting with a share that lets down its investors as TRIN has.

Good luck with your TRIN stake. At this price surely there’s hope of a better share price ahead?
Posted at 14/12/2023 08:52 by nocents
I have sent 2 emails to the IR representatives, Vigo, asking for 1) some sort of communication 2) the consideration of asset disposal.
I have received no replies which is very poor.
So the company employed to relate to investors is not relating/communicating.
Trinity is not communicating.
Despite their promise to keep investors ongoingly informed, they are not.
It is now mid December. There has been ample opportunity to release social media info regarding drilling, just as there has been ample opportunity for director buys, had they wanted to.
Yet again silence and kept in the dark while the share price responds to all-time lows.
Large holders should get together and call for change if this communication vacuum is because of poor news or a problem of some sort.
After all the hype regarding LC1 comingled zones being expected to yield much more etc. , this is yet again appalling treatment of investors.
I am not surprised only one person turned up to the presentation.
I personally find it deeply umnprofessional not to have heard back twice from Vigo. The IR officer at Trin( previously Tracey Mackenzie) has cut responsibility for investor communications totally, where Tracey would always respond no matter what.
I am no longer sure what sort of company Trinity has become whilst we sit in silence and the share price reaches all-time depths. Unbelievable.

Your Recent History