ADVFN Logo ADVFN

We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.

Trending Now

Toplists

It looks like you aren't logged in.
Click the button below to log in and view your recent history.

Hot Features

Registration Strip Icon for default Register for Free to get streaming real-time quotes, interactive charts, live options flow, and more.

TRT Transense Technologies Plc

187.50
7.50 (4.17%)
Last Updated: 08:00:00
Delayed by 15 minutes
Share Name Share Symbol Market Type Share ISIN Share Description
Transense Technologies Plc LSE:TRT London Ordinary Share GB00BDHDTH21 ORD 10P
  Price Change % Change Share Price Shares Traded Last Trade
  7.50 4.17% 187.50 3 08:00:00
Bid Price Offer Price High Price Low Price Open Price
180.00 195.00 187.50 187.50 187.50
Industry Sector Turnover Profit EPS - Basic PE Ratio Market Cap
Motor Veh Suply,new Pts-whsl 4.18M 1.57M 0.1007 18.62 27.98M
Last Trade Time Trade Type Trade Size Trade Price Currency
08:12:46 O 3 180.30 GBX

Transense Technologies (TRT) Latest News

Transense Technologies (TRT) Discussions and Chat

Transense Technologies (TRT) Most Recent Trades

Trade Time Trade Price Trade Size Trade Value Trade Type
08:12:48180.3035.41O
2024-11-20 17:15:00185.0025,00046,250.00O
2024-11-20 17:15:00185.0020,00037,000.00O
2024-11-20 16:35:02180.00497894.60UT
2024-11-20 12:41:12185.002,6504,902.50O

Transense Technologies (TRT) Top Chat Posts

Top Posts
Posted at 20/11/2024 08:20 by Transense Technologies Daily Update
Transense Technologies Plc is listed in the Motor Veh Suply,new Pts-whsl sector of the London Stock Exchange with ticker TRT. The last closing price for Transense Technologies was 180p.
Transense Technologies currently has 15,542,384 shares in issue. The market capitalisation of Transense Technologies is £27,976,291.
Transense Technologies has a price to earnings ratio (PE ratio) of 17.87.
This morning TRT shares opened at -
Posted at 01/11/2024 18:11 by king1pin2
Last company purchase at 91p in April so seems a lost oppertunity to me in that if the management and most of us on this BB considered the share price very undervalued then who knows at todays share price .
As I say just trying to understand the thinking behind the buyback decisions.
Posted at 01/11/2024 10:17 by king1pin2
Yes Ryan is well invested now but as the share price retreated towards the £1.50 level I did think that the company missed a chance to pick up more undervalued shares in the buybacks .
On that subject as the agm approaches and as its on the agenda it would be interesting to have views on extending the buyback (resolution 11).
I must admit to being slightly confused by our buybacks when compared to bigger company’s buybacks but would welcome views on this subject .
I look forward to being at the AGM .
Posted at 23/9/2024 09:11 by superbobo
While the results are not bad, it is the same story of "jam tomorrow". Itracks revenue(which is baked in as a bond in the share price) is up 30%(majority of revenue growth), while the EPS are only up 15%(which implies the cost base has gone up). The underlying business of translogik(up 9% from a modest base) and SAW(actually down with great potential). I also wonder if the reason why profits are up 20% while EPS only 15% is due to the 10% or so dilution due to the vesting of shares. If it is not then the EPS will drop in the next period. I would personally be curious to hear what management has to say at 4pm today.
Posted at 22/9/2024 19:43 by king1pin2
I don’t think to much has changed since the last trading statement But the outlook for Saw is gathering pace and it’s my beliefe that investors are now starting to relise just how big the Saw opportunity is going forward and that in my view is what’s driving the share price forward just like the early days when we had a much higher market cap.
I don’t expect any fireworks in the morning but that been said a quiet day would be welcome after such a good September .
Posted at 18/9/2024 09:41 by timbo003
>>>Commander77,

Some of my TRT shares are held as certificates too, for example the first time I bought was in the July 2015 placing at 1.5p (equivalent to 75p/share post consolidation). In December 2016 following the 50:1 consolidation I was sent a new replacement certificate reflecting an increase in the nominal value of the shares from 1p to 50p and a 50 fold reduction in the number of shares.

looking at the shareprice history, I suspect you purchased your shares for around about £1/share in October 2007, in which case you would now have 344 shares which will be worth around about 185p/share (£635)

I suggest you check out your bottom draw to see if you have a replacement certificate, if you haven't, you will need to contact Neville registrars and get a replacement, otherwise you (or your executors) will not be able to sell the shares:
Posted at 09/9/2024 08:54 by king1pin2
Let’s be clear that today’s share price reflects the remaining income stream from itrak and improved forward looking Translodgik income.
The prospect of future income from Saw has perhaps taken our shares over the £1.50 mark but if the results show that the customer pipeline and income from Saw continues to grow then I would expect the share price to be testing the £2.00 mark.
The size of the Saw opportunity is massive and having been a shareholder during the £30 bubble days nothing would surprise me .
Posted at 10/5/2024 21:38 by bottletop
Been on holiday and missed a few things but this is another comment on the difference between projects and sales of manufactured products. I, too, have been invested here since the £4 days.
It astonishes me that a company of this size and history can talk credibly to major engineering companies. To do that, you need graduate engineers of substantial background and experience. How do you maintain such expertise, or even keep graduate engineers busy and ‘professionally engaged’, in a company the size of TRT? How would you talk to helicopter manufacturers without them?
How many employees of all kinds does TRT have in total? Around 20? What can its engineers be doing to keep their expertise at any kind of leading edge without these projects? Even if they are adequately paid, good young engineers will feel they are squandering their careers if they have nothing challenging to work on. It is not enough just to have one or two technical experts at a senior level.
Projects have come and gone, including wind turbine torque measurements, which seem to have produced nothing in business terms. In reality they have allowed TRT to employ engineers who are comfortable interacting with academics and big players in other industries. Even the best technicians cannot do this without leadership from a professional engineer. These various ‘projects̵7; have typically been keeping young engineers both engaged in SAW and busy - with salary costs covered - even if little profit has appeared in the bottom line.
Patents expire and, as others have noted, TRT has been filing no patent applications in recent years. Increasingly it lives on knowhow and experience. I don’t know any of them, but their numbers must be so small that the loss of very few could leave TRT without its expertise. An entire generation of engineers has now retired since TRT caught my interest and, I imagine these external projects have been immensely valuable in keeping just a core of engineers active in TRT.
Electric motors are the future. For climate reasons the world is turning increasingly to electricity. As we have heard, SAW measurements of stress or torque in this electromagnetically hostile environment offers a great advantage – it can communicate measurements using ultrasonics rather than through currents in copper wires or by using radio transmission, both of which are difficult near the heart of powerful electric motor. SAW applications will surely grow. I am (or was) a scientist not an engineer but I know research environments and I would guess that until TRT reaches, say, 100 employees it will be acutely vulnerable to losing just a small number of key engineers. Thumbs up. I am increasingly hopeful.
Posted at 29/12/2023 14:55 by mister magpie
Having been here and in TRT since 2006 and as a matter of courtesy to anyone interested, I’m advising I’m out.
Between midday 22nd December and midday 29th December I’ve sold all of my 205,000 TRT shares.
I’ve had enough and have done this to avoid a wipeout which I feared, whilst denying myself a much higher share price than I’ve exited at.
I’m pleased at my selling prices, but equally you should all be buoyed at the share price resilience to the exit in under three trading days of a major shareholder. That suggests bad timing by me and better times for all you holders so good luck to you all!
Posted at 09/12/2023 11:44 by gnnmartin
The confusing share price is an artefact of history. Before the 'Big Bang' of 1983 (
there were stockbrokers, who had the monopoly of buying & selling shares on behalf of members of the public, and jobbers who had the monopoly of quoting bid/offer prices in exchange for guaranteeing to make and honour such offers. The changes introduced by the big bang included the ability for anyone to post bid or offer prices as long as they honoured the post.

Under the old system the bid/offer prices were fairly stable. Jobbers did not move the price unless trade was significantly out of balance. The expectation behind the big bang was that if the jobbers were quoting an unreasonably large spread, wealthy individuals who were not jobbing members of the stock exchange would step in with a better bid or offer price.

At one point I held a significant number of Eidos shares that had risen from 18p to £60, and since the quoted spread was about 10%, I tried my hand at being an amateur jobber with a spread of 5%. Although my bid/offer was taken up a few times, one of the many reasons why it was not much of a success was that the major market makers immediately adjusted their bid/offer to match mine.

One risk of being an amateur jobber was that if (for example) you posted a bid or offer for 10,000 shares, you had to honour a request to buy or sell just a single share. In the days when everyone bought or sold through a broker who charged commission, the commission might be several times the price of the one share. Thus the market makers could have killed my little venture by buying a single share once a day. Brokers now offer commission free trading, anyone can post a bid or offer for a single share (I believe), and can buy or sell a single share against a posted bid or offer. That is why you see so many share trades of ridiculously small value.

This makes it hard to decide how to quote market prices. Do you quote the mid point between highest bid and lowest offer, or do you ignore any bid or offer with value below some threshold? Or do you quote the price at which the last deal was done? Different strategies can lead to significantly different 'market prices'.

Even pre big bang, a broker would negotiate a price with the jobber. A jobber quoted bid offer prices that would not be too painful if news came in that snapped up his bid or offer before he had chance to change them, but they would still deal well within those spreads with a trusted broker. Now a good broker is still important for a serious investor. As an example, yesterday I bought shares that were reported at 6p/6.5p and I bought 100,000 at 6.09p: the commission was a lot less than the £410 difference between the cost at 6.5p and the cost at 6.09p. The London Stock Exchange still quotes a mid price of 6.25p with a bid/offer of 6/6.5p.
Posted at 22/7/2023 06:17 by mister magpie
Sojourno - thank you for the further clarification.
Reading back, I agree that my wording was unnecessarily harsh for which I apologise.
That said I continue to believe that the current position of TRT has nothing to do with the global or UK economy.
Of course circumstances in the wider world and more closely in the UK affect companies and their development, but TRT’s fate depends so much on one small element it cannot be regarded as a microcosm of the UK economy or standing.
Put simply, and viewing the situation as two extremes, if the UK slumped into deep recession but TRT made the significant SAW breakthrough we all dream of, then the share price would fly.
Conversely, a booming UK economy with SAW going nowhere would see the TRT share price remain deep in the doldrums.
Transense Technologies share price data is direct from the London Stock Exchange

Your Recent History

Delayed Upgrade Clock