ADVFN Logo ADVFN

We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.

Trending Now

Toplists

It looks like you aren't logged in.
Click the button below to log in and view your recent history.

Hot Features

Registration Strip Icon for alerts Register for real-time alerts, custom portfolio, and market movers

TRT Transense Technologies Plc

187.50
7.50 (4.17%)
Last Updated: 08:00:00
Delayed by 15 minutes
Share Name Share Symbol Market Stock Type
Transense Technologies Plc TRT London Ordinary Share
  Price Change Price Change % Share Price Last Trade
7.50 4.17% 187.50 08:00:00
Open Price Low Price High Price Close Price Previous Close
187.50 187.50 187.50 180.00
more quote information »
Industry Sector
AUTOMOBILES & PARTS

Transense Technologies TRT Dividends History

No dividends issued between 21 Nov 2014 and 21 Nov 2024

Top Dividend Posts

Top Posts
Posted at 18/11/2024 21:08 by nico115
I won't be selling at the top But I think who's has 400p to 600p all one this .I probably won't be In then but I got a feeling Saw is going to be HUGE.Let's see . My fave 3 Spsy kino and TRT
Posted at 06/10/2024 08:38 by major courtenay
This is because Charlie Munger persuaded Buffet to buy “wonderful companies at fair prices” and stop buying companies just because they were cheap. There is a greater level of security around Munger’s approach. And those companies tended to be fairly established and a certain size. Importantly, they tended to have a long established earnings stream. And most importantly, they had what Munger called a “moat”. A degree of security from competition.

Interestingly, whilst TRT does not seem to fit the category around size and established earnings (yet), it does have a form of moat with regard to IP and the increasing awareness, testing and adoption of our products by clients, as well as the stickiness of our product. Long lead times and the requirement to engineer into systems from an early stage in the process.


It’s worth noting that we are no longer a penny stock. It’s taken quite a few years to get to this point. We’re still obviously small cap, but we are hopefully moving slowly onto Buffet / Munger territory. We certainly need secure, established incomes that won’t be guillotined after ten years! Obviously we hope Translogik and Sawsense are slowly moving into position to provide this.
Posted at 05/10/2024 08:36 by bhoddhisattva
Err is this the biotech co? What has this to do with TRT?
Posted at 27/9/2024 10:29 by lfc4ever
I DO NOT FEEL THAT I AM AT THE START OF THE TRT JOURNEY!!!!!
Posted at 24/9/2024 10:03 by mattjos
I still think one of the biggest challenges in the future here will be to remain independent and not fall to a takeover before the true value emerges.
Good that we have notable II presence on the share register + managment at 3% to help avoid that possibility.

Once we get the SAW tech embedded into some volume products and the benefits become more public knowledge, it will quickly become apparent that embedding SAW into electric motors & drivetrains as part of finished products will give those OEM's a clear commercial advantage in their finished products.
That will 100% cause some to see the clear advantage in owning the tech and therefore attempting to takeover TRT.

We are still such a tiny company and not at all well known with a technology that many simply do not yet properly understand but the company is working hard with Tradeshows and social media to raise the profile.
It's just a matter of time before the first approach arrives, imo
Posted at 23/9/2024 07:57 by major courtenay
The potential does appear to be not only growing, but actually converting into growing profits with every results. Will be very interested to see what they say in the presentation.

K1 that’s a tricky one as there are so many erratic variables in play on a day to day basis, which become smoothed out over the years. Some will be top slicing around these levels. Some deterred by AIM’s appalling recent track record. Often the sudden upturns in the chart come without apparent cause. Perhaps it’s the penny dropping as TRT lights up more radars over time, sometimes by word of mouth, sometimes as an analyst gets through a backlog of companies to run the slide rule over. Short answer: I haven’t the foggiest idea, but I wouldn’t be surprised if there’s “selling on the fact” around the results, with the next uptick with the announcement of another SAW project.
Posted at 18/9/2024 11:00 by sojourno
Excellent work team TRT!

As part of the project, Transense will also invest in developing its supply chain and manufacturing capabilities, ensuring readiness to meet automotive market production and quality requirements and support Protean's market launch.

They don't seem all that far from production either.
Posted at 23/8/2024 17:07 by gnnmartin
I agree with Mattjos. I don't want to see the Bridgestone money paid out in dividends. I want TRT to have long term repeatable income before they pay out dividends, and after that if they have more capital than they need, I'm happy that they distribute some capital as special dividends.
Posted at 31/7/2024 20:14 by pldazzle
MNS - While I don't disagree, it's nonetheless a big exposure to what for now still looks to be one single customer in the field of motor racing. And a customer, at that, who -
(1) has (OK, I stand to be corrected here) the sole contract with F1 for electronic motor controls until, wait for it, 2030;
(2) is arguably not in the securest of financial positions; and
(3) has an owner - Greybull Capital - which has a long and sorry record of major failed investments.
"By 2019, Greybull had bought several struggling firms for low prices, but many of them had subsequently failed. Examples include the airline Monarch, sports bar and snooker hall chain Riley's, the M Local convenience store chain, and electrical goods retailer Comet. Greybull bought British Steel, Britain's second-largest steelworks, for £1 in 2016, invested £20-million in the company, and charged it £6-million in fees and accrued £14-million of owed interest in the years after. British Steel became insolvent in May 2019, after failing to secure government funding."


Of course I hope it never happens - but, supposing hypothetically that McLA were to fail, what assurance could be expected that GE, Airbus (as you mention those two) or whoever, would not only keep TRT in the loop but seamlessly and immediately pick up with them where McLA left off?

I have an open mind, but I don't think it's unreasonable to raise these issues. As I indicated before, it may be just as well that TRT has other irons in the fire, of which some look very promising.
Posted at 10/5/2024 21:38 by bottletop
Been on holiday and missed a few things but this is another comment on the difference between projects and sales of manufactured products. I, too, have been invested here since the £4 days.
It astonishes me that a company of this size and history can talk credibly to major engineering companies. To do that, you need graduate engineers of substantial background and experience. How do you maintain such expertise, or even keep graduate engineers busy and ‘professionally engaged’, in a company the size of TRT? How would you talk to helicopter manufacturers without them?
How many employees of all kinds does TRT have in total? Around 20? What can its engineers be doing to keep their expertise at any kind of leading edge without these projects? Even if they are adequately paid, good young engineers will feel they are squandering their careers if they have nothing challenging to work on. It is not enough just to have one or two technical experts at a senior level.
Projects have come and gone, including wind turbine torque measurements, which seem to have produced nothing in business terms. In reality they have allowed TRT to employ engineers who are comfortable interacting with academics and big players in other industries. Even the best technicians cannot do this without leadership from a professional engineer. These various ‘projects̵7; have typically been keeping young engineers both engaged in SAW and busy - with salary costs covered - even if little profit has appeared in the bottom line.
Patents expire and, as others have noted, TRT has been filing no patent applications in recent years. Increasingly it lives on knowhow and experience. I don’t know any of them, but their numbers must be so small that the loss of very few could leave TRT without its expertise. An entire generation of engineers has now retired since TRT caught my interest and, I imagine these external projects have been immensely valuable in keeping just a core of engineers active in TRT.
Electric motors are the future. For climate reasons the world is turning increasingly to electricity. As we have heard, SAW measurements of stress or torque in this electromagnetically hostile environment offers a great advantage – it can communicate measurements using ultrasonics rather than through currents in copper wires or by using radio transmission, both of which are difficult near the heart of powerful electric motor. SAW applications will surely grow. I am (or was) a scientist not an engineer but I know research environments and I would guess that until TRT reaches, say, 100 employees it will be acutely vulnerable to losing just a small number of key engineers. Thumbs up. I am increasingly hopeful.