Tomco Energy Share Discussion Threads

[wilson2] 30/6/2021 10:05

What is the offer Goulding ?Just to remind us.

[vauch] 30/6/2021 09:46

Goulding what is the update offer.
Oh i had not read the post from busa

[goulding1215] 30/6/2021 09:38

That is a hell of an offer for PQE considering where the share price was prior to the first Swedish/German offer.

Greenfield/Tomco next? That offer will not have gone unnoticed from the majors,

[lopodop] 30/6/2021 08:42

SL
What's your take on the present share value?

[lopodop] 30/6/2021 08:23

Should the share price descend to .50p, then the chairman must resign immediately. Some new blood may not come amiss.
As an AIM chairman his reputation will become further tarnished in the City if he cannot get the price to a realistic 2p. MALCOLM GROAT needs to begin to act like a chairman.

[lopodop] 30/6/2021 08:16

TD
RMART tends to lose his cool when bad news/ no news abounds.

[lopodop] 30/6/2021 07:57

TD
A very good morning. Is SL STILL here? Remarkably quiet. Has he moved across to P?

[the diddymen] 30/6/2021 07:41

Reichsmart do you live proximately to and know, and/or, liase with John Potter. You have never responded to the allegations on these boards. An answer would help give context to your questions and posts?

[ducky fuzz] 29/6/2021 21:52

Tomorrow is the 30th So I will predict an RNS at 7.01am.

[lopodop] 29/6/2021 21:39

RMART
By all means rubbish everything that I say. Good evening.

[rmart] 29/6/2021 21:15

Once again you’re post is full of nonsense. Using words like ‘acquiesceR17; does not make you impressive. It makes you look like you want to be important when in reality you know you are not.

You sound like sages apprentice.

[rmart] 29/6/2021 21:12

I don’t know that but nice of you to acknowledge it is possible, still no answer to my question though from wilson2 or yourself

[lopodop] 29/6/2021 20:37

RMART
What you have to accept is that unless the directors are experienced and well able to make a success of this project, it will fail. You of all people have strong views about TOM's directors.
How on earth can you be confident that all is and will go well. Think! It is so simple and blatantly obvious. Do you really want Tom to blunder on and consume your money for no return. This has occurred time and time again in its lifetime and what has to happen to turn the tables? It is a very sorry tale aided and abetted by a group of substantial shareholders who seem to acquiesce in the situation.

,

[lopodop] 29/6/2021 18:03

RMART
Perhaps you already know the funding has been sourced and lined up unconditionally in which case why don't they say.

[rmart] 29/6/2021 17:49

I like it that you are here as you are really stupid and will soon be shown as such.

They will secure offers of funding for the plant at the same time as they finalise the land deal and then you will dream up another issue.

[talais] 29/6/2021 17:16

They always turn up when good news is coming.

[lopodop] 29/6/2021 17:03

R Mart
Could you not ask LC via JP as you know him?

[thesageofsaint] 29/6/2021 16:44

Ps: no I will not go away. I like it here.

[rmart] 29/6/2021 16:44

So you have done that?

[thesageofsaint] 29/6/2021 16:44

For such a position of leadership you have amongst the Pygmies you are remarkably thick. Seems I have to put things in sequential bullets and not use words of more than 2 syllables. If they do not have the land secured until the end of 2022, then the scam blows up. They therefore need to pay the money to secure the land for 18 months so the story is maintained. This will require a placing. This is where it ends though. Time will pass, RNS will land spouting vagaries about 'ongoing discussions' blah blah, but no money available means there can and will never be commercial oil ever and ever amen.

[lopodop] 29/6/2021 16:41

Ask Louis Castro for his assessment of realistic funding sources and for update on progress made so far.

[rmart] 29/6/2021 16:29

Where are the funding problems?

You have simply made that up. What a crooked individual.

[lopodop] 29/6/2021 16:28

RMART
4. Why - do investors have any confidence in the management?
- experienced investors can see flaws in operating 50/50 Greenfield venture
- uncertainty, uncertainty, uncertainty has prevailed so far
- more delays
- funding problems
- investor support waning.

[lopodop] 29/6/2021 16:27

RMART
4. Why - do investors have any confidence in the management?
- experienced investors can see flaws in operating 50/50 Greenfield venture
- uncertainty, uncertainty, uncertainty has prevailed so far
- more delays
- funding problems
- investor support waning.

[rmart] 29/6/2021 16:16

so you will go away if and when they announce the project finance as you are stating they will not get it?

oh, sorry, and you are suggesting that they will pay $1.8m to finalise the land deal BEFORE they know if they have the funding to build the plant?