We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tiger Royalties And Investments Plc | LSE:TIR | London | Ordinary Share | GB0002308525 | ORD 0.1P |
Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.00 | 0.00% | 0.20 | 0.15 | 0.25 | 0.20 | 0.20 | 0.20 | 0.00 | 07:43:19 |
Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Offices-holdng Companies,nec | -160k | -457k | -0.0009 | -2.22 | 1.07M |
Date | Subject | Author | Discuss |
---|---|---|---|
22/12/2010 11:44 | I doubt if Bruce is still awake !! I bought in at 4p about 7 years ago and know this company intimately. I have seen it hold 30M shares in Ascent which went up to 28p !!! at which time Tiger some millions in profit on that stock. Did they sell any then ??? NO ! They waited several years and then sold their Ascents at something like 4p. Brilliant !! Its other investments are piddeling little tranches which have been stagnating for years. Yes they will come good if you live long enough !!! e.g Franconia and African Eagle. Last year and this year they have sold their two best performers, Nautical and Pan African, both of which had much further to run !! Why ??? Did they need to add to their cah balance ?? This share has been at an enormous discount to its NAV for years and years and very few people buy it. Does that not tell us something ?? Look at their website ansd see how out of date the info is. I have written to Samtani twice and Bird twice pointing out glaring errors which have been rectified, but did even get an acknowledgement ?? NO - I'm only a shareholder. Some years ago somebody suggested that this company was Bruce's little pension fund - its beginning to look that way. | curt3 | |
22/12/2010 10:28 | NAV update early Jan so maybe some news then too. | maxbubble | |
22/12/2010 09:56 | Come on Bruce. Just need a nice little RNS announcing an exciting redeploy for the cash and the share price will pop. Christmas will be paid for. Yours .. | snape | |
07/12/2010 16:18 | Thanks! Gloat. | clearsoup | |
06/12/2010 14:46 | I've manually entered the prices for the plus listed shares to give us some idea of current NAV. | fordtin | |
06/12/2010 14:34 | Hi clearsoup, Plus markets are revamping their website and it's being tempermental. I'll try to track down the relevent info when their site is working properly. | fordtin | |
06/12/2010 14:21 | I was hoping to have a gloat over NAV etc. but the spreadsheet is playing up :-( | clearsoup | |
15/11/2010 21:58 | See BR has made an investment on PLUS today in Guild Acquisitions. Looks like BR might be back making deals! | topvest | |
15/11/2010 16:32 | noted and agreed | crazy russian | |
15/11/2010 15:45 | crazy russian - fair point BUT if "Current Tiger Resources Ords 172.57m, NAV 30th Sept 2010 4.09p" and today with the share price up and the last trade at 2.5p that's a HUGE discount - something like -38.88% Since when does even a half decent Investment Trust deserve that kind of discount? I.m.o. it reflects extremely badly on management - particularly given that the commodity sector has boomed as a result of the CB's trashing of money. What we should be seeing is an even higher N.A.V. and a much smaller discount in the share price to that value. | witteklip | |
14/11/2010 10:21 | @witteklip I dont disagree iro the directors operating of the company but.. surely as TIR is only an investment trust, albeit not in the IT section on the stockmarket it would be usual to trade at a discount to NAV as do nearly all ITs | crazy russian | |
09/11/2010 18:13 | We're all still waiting. Management have been asleep at the helm for almost seven years! | witteklip | |
06/11/2010 14:28 | >witteklip - 28 Oct'10 - 18:12 - 1381 of 1383 RE copy of the register of shareholders _ Unless the law has changed since I was active in this area it is a breach of the Companies Act to refuse to provide a copy provided you tender the correct fees. I would suggest you double check the law (and if I am right) apply in writing. If the Company still blocks a quick note to the FSA with a copy to the minister for Trade and Indudtry - That should get some action. Edited:- It appears that there have been changes to the law but the register should still be available subject to certain tests. full details here:- the key part why I think you may have aright to a cooy from the above link is A. Examples of proper purposes shareholders or indirect investors wanting to contact other shareholders about matters relating to the company, their shareholding or a related exercise of rights. Such matters might include: general representations about the activities or management of the company communications in connection with the exercise of member rights under the Act, such as garnering of support for a requisition, circulating a member's statement relating to a resolution to be put to a shareholder meeting, communications concerning requests for an independent scrutiny of a poll, the publication on the company's website of audit concerns and voting/support for a particular course of action; | pugugly | |
03/11/2010 15:47 | post 6 irrelevent because I'd missed resolution 7 of the AGM. Why did shareholders reject the request for authority to buy the company's own shares? Buying back shares seems a very sensible thing to do whilst they are trading at a discount to cash! | fordtin | |
03/11/2010 09:52 | Missed the news late last night of the 3% shareholder,This would make a great shell for someone to come to market. | balcony | |
31/10/2010 18:35 | Tiger is similar to Gledhow Investments, but they are on 80-90% cash. Bruce Rowan at least has been cautious, but both of these vehicles could generate fairly significant value by just being liquidated. Somehow, I think they will just carry on as they have been for the next couple of years until Bruce wants to cash them in totally. The positive aspect is that he hasn't trashed the NAV by buying poorer quality investments, which is what he has done a bit with Starvest. | topvest | |
31/10/2010 18:03 | Frotin:- Congratulations on a well structured new thread, however the Company is still sitting on 63% of portfolio value in cash. £4,759,781 (ex your live google spreadsheet) Sitting on cash while drawing nice direcors fees seems to me to be the history of this company. A fair bit of movement since valuation of 31/05/09 but no sign that I can see of any benefit for shareholders. I suspect far better to invest directly in underlying investment (declaration I hold Nautical - very good and Ascent very bad) - although a lovely discount to NAV - but how does the PI capitalise on this embedded value? | pugugly | |
31/10/2010 16:50 | fordtin - That was in June! You would have thought that a new broom might have removed some the more glaringly obvious cobwebs by now... | witteklip | |
31/10/2010 10:16 | Quotes may be delayed up to 20 minutes. Information is provided 'as is' and solely for informational purposes, not for trading purposes or advice With the recent appointment of as CEO, and in light of the following statement dated 29th September 2010, it would seem reasonable to expect Tiger Resources to be an active participant in the increased trading activity seen in the junior resource market; "In essence, our investment policy will be geared towards junior companies with strong management working across the commodity spectrum in jurisdictions that offer transparent mining and exploration legislation. We are, in addition, seeking value investments in major cash producing mining companies. Tiger will also aim to invest in oil and gas opportunities showing good fundamentals. We see a quiet second half and will use this time to position ourselves in what should be a better emerging resource investment environment. On behalf of the board 29 September 2010" | fordtin | |
29/10/2010 10:17 | Thanks Witty. Yes it is so frustrating, especially as it could be a great little company. With directors holding shares I just cant understand their attitude. Surely its in everyones interest to give the company some activity and visibility to the market. | curt3 |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions