We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.
Register to chat with like-minded investors on our interactive forums.
| Share Name | Share Symbol | Market | Type | Share ISIN | Share Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tiger Royalties And Investments Plc | LSE:TIR | London | Ordinary Share | GB0002308525 | ORD 0.1P |
| Price Change | % Change | Share Price | Shares Traded | Last Trade
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.00 | 0.00% | 0.10 | 818,000 | 00:00:00 |
| Bid Price | Offer Price | High Price | Low Price | Open Price | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.05 | 0.15 | 0.10 | 0.10 | 0.10 | |
| Industry Sector | Turnover | Profit | EPS - Basic | PE Ratio | Market Cap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Offices-holdng Companies,nec | -104k | -403k | -0.0008 | -1.25 | 535.13k |
| Last Trade Time | Trade Type | Trade Size | Trade Price | Currency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12:00:24 | O | 538,000 | 0.125 | GBX |
| Date | Time | Source | Headline |
|---|---|---|---|
| 08/10/2024 | 15:46 | UK RNS | Tiger Royalties and Investments PLC Quarter-end Portfolio Value Update |
| 27/9/2024 | 14:31 | UK RNS | Tiger Royalties and Investments PLC Unaudited results for the 6 months to.. |
| 01/8/2024 | 14:11 | UK RNS | Tiger Royalties and Investments PLC Result of AGM |
| 09/7/2024 | 06:00 | UK RNS | Tiger Royalties and Investments PLC Notice of AGM |
| 05/7/2024 | 08:56 | UK RNS | Tiger Royalties and Investments PLC Quarter-end Portfolio Value Update |
| 27/6/2024 | 11:22 | ALNC |  IN BRIEF: Tiger Royalties stock drops as NAV "disappointingly" falls |
| 27/6/2024 | 06:00 | UK RNS | Tiger Royalties and Investments PLC Final Results |
| 11/4/2024 | 06:00 | UK RNS | Tiger Royalties and Investments PLC Quarter-end portfolio value update |
| 09/1/2024 | 13:56 | UKREG | Tiger Royalties and Investments PLC Quarter-end Portfolio Value Update |
Tiger Royalties And Inve... (TIR) Share Charts1 Year Tiger Royalties And Inve... Chart |
|
1 Month Tiger Royalties And Inve... Chart |
Intraday Tiger Royalties And Inve... Chart |
| Date | Time | Title | Posts |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11/12/2024 | 00:40 | Tiger Resource Finance - Solid Rowan Play | 114 |
| 14/9/2012 | 11:53 | Tiger Resource Finance plc | 269 |
| 30/3/2011 | 09:56 | Tiger Resource Finance Plc | 1,421 |
| 02/2/2011 | 15:23 | Tiger resources Plc | 10 |
| 02/2/2011 | 15:22 | Tiger Resources - do the maths! | 13 |
| Trade Time | Trade Price | Trade Size | Trade Value | Trade Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-12-13 12:00:26 | 0.13 | 538,000 | 672.50 | O |
| Top Posts |
|---|
Posted at 14/12/2024 08:20 by Tiger Royalties And Inve... Daily Update Tiger Royalties And Investments Plc is listed in the Offices-holdng Companies,nec sector of the London Stock Exchange with ticker TIR. The last closing price for Tiger Royalties And Inve... was 0.10p.Tiger Royalties And Inve... currently has 535,128,553 shares in issue. The market capitalisation of Tiger Royalties And Inve... is £535,129. Tiger Royalties And Inve... has a price to earnings ratio (PE ratio) of -1.25. This morning TIR shares opened at 0.10p |
Posted at 11/9/2023 21:13 by iceagefarmer why? thought it was a dog share..everything dave4545 buys is a dog |
Posted at 27/5/2022 14:43 by dave4545 Really need some new system of match bargaining at mid price, this is just a scam for mm's to make huge profits. I bet when one sell goes in all those 500k buyers in first will rush for the door before their trades turn into a loss.Should be able to buy and sell at mid price no mm's |
Posted at 26/9/2020 07:23 by danawinner Sadly Bruce Rowan died last September. Please see my post earlier this morning on LSE which highlights the situation far more clearly than TW has. I have been trying to buy TIR for months |
Posted at 03/10/2017 09:43 by ntv RTO or just a couple of speculative tiny buys moving price |
Posted at 06/3/2014 08:15 by johndee Investments held by the Company as at 31/12/13Name Number of Share price Valuation shares -------------------- GBP GBP -------------------- African Eagle Resources PLC 1,241,174 0.00275 3,413 -------------------- (see note African Pioneer PLC 57,000,002 2) 210,000 -------------------- Anglo American PLC 11,500 13.20000 151,800 -------------------- Ascent Resources PLC 9,642,857 0.00900 86,786 -------------------- Astar Minerals PLC 4,000,000 0.00115 4,600 -------------------- Aurum Mining PLC 8,333,333 0.02250 187,500 -------------------- ETFS Physical Platinum 2,250 79.78227 179,510 -------------------- Jubilee Platinum PLC 1,169,600 0.03075 35,965 -------------------- New World Oil and Gas PLC 5,000,000 0.00625 31,250 -------------------- Northern Petroleum PLC 294,118 0.33500 98,530 -------------------- PanContinental Oil and Gas NL 885,714 0.03283 29,080 -------------------- Papua Mining PLC 230,000 0.28250 64,975 -------------------- Petroceltic International PLC 66,640 1.75000 116,620 -------------------- Polar Star Mining Corp 833,333 0.08507 70,891 -------------------- Praetorian Resources PLC 400,000 0.09000 36,000 -------------------- (see note Sovereign Energy PLC 40,000,000 2) 40,000 -------------------- Sovereign Mines of Africa PLC 2,000,000 0.02625 52,500 -------------------- Sunrise Resources PLC 665,000 0.00450 2,993 -------------------- Taipan Resources Inc 310,000 0.15879 49,225 -------------------- Trap Oil PLC 330,000 0.09125 30,113 -------------------- Tertiary Minerals PLC 1,330,000 0.10500 139,650 -------------------- U3O8 Holdings PLC 4,166,666 0.00200 8,333 -------------------- Union Med Tech PLC 625,000 (see note - 4) -------------------- Vatukoula Gold Mines PLC 150,000 0.06000 9,000 -------------------- Wentworth Resources Ltd 220,000 0.49068 107,950 -------------------- Xtract Resources PLC 344,827,584 0.00310 1,068,966 -------------------- Total Investments 2,815,650 |
Posted at 12/12/2012 09:45 by mine cap Tiger Resource Finance Plc is an Investment Fund focused on the Resource Sector. The company is listed on AIM, the London Stock Exchange's Alternative Investment Market. Its mission is to invest in natural resource companies globally, capitalising on early entry level in mineral projects, and adding technical and management expertise where necessary.The company intends to be a unique player in the Mineral Resource Sector, offering investors the opportunity to invest in several well-managed and well-researched Mineral Resource projects. Board : Ronald Bruce Rowan - Chairman A businessman who is a shareholder in a number of UK public companies. He is also chairman of Sunvest Corporation Limited (listed in Australia) and Starvest Plc (AIM listed). Colin Bird - Director - Chief Executive Officer Colin Bird has a Diploma in Mining Engineering, is a Fellow of the Institute of Materials, Minerals and Mining and is a certified Mine Manager both in the UK and SA. The formative part of his career was spent with the National Coal Board in UK and thereafter he moved to the Zambia Consolidated Copper mines and then to South Africa to work in a management position with Anglo American Coal. On his return to the UK he was Technical and Operations Director of Costain Mining Limited, which involved responsibility for gold operations in the Argentina, Venezuela and Spain. In addition to his coal mining activities he has been involved in the management of Nickel, Copper, Gold and other diverse mineral operations. He has founded and floated several public companies in the resource sector and served on resource company boards in the UK, Canada and South Africa. Michael H Nolan - Executive Director A director since 1995. He was appointed chief executive officer of Minmet Plc in November 1999, having held the position of finance director for all the companies in the Minmet Group since 1994. A Chartered Accountant, he worked with Deloitte & Touche in Dublin and was executive director of Equity and Corporate Finance Plc, the London based corporate finance and investment house. Raju Samtani - Finance Director Previous experience includes three years as Group Financial Controller at marketing services agency - WTS Group Limited, where he was appointed by the Virgin Group to oversee their investment in the WTS Group Ltd. More recently he was finance director of Kiwara Plc which was acquired by First Quantum Minerals Ltd in January 2010. Over the last few years, he has been involved in senior managerial positions for several AIM quoted/JSE listed companies predominantly in the resource sector and has also been involved in FSA compliance work within the investment business sector. . |
Posted at 24/8/2012 11:05 by safman Large upside already in XTR... If it was worth buying anything it would probably be TIR... XTR shareholders have taken a fairly large shafting.. saffy... |
Posted at 24/8/2012 11:01 by cottoner Reason for today's rise:· Tiger Resource Finance plc, members of the board of Tiger Resource and Mr Aaron D'Este, an independent investor, have agreed, subject to certain conditions, to subscribe for a total of 758,620,689 New Ordinary Shares ("Subscription Shares") at a price of 0.0435 pence per share to raise £330,000 (the "Subscriptions"); · Following the Subscriptions, Tiger Resource and the Tiger Resource Co-Investors will hold 689,655,172 New Ordinary Shares, representing approximately 29.9 per cent. of the enlarged share capital of the Company; · Tiger Resource is an AIM quoted investment company focused on the resource sector; · Colin Bird, a director of Tiger Resource, will join the Board as Executive Chairman of the Company with effect from completion of the Subscriptions; |
Posted at 16/1/2011 15:49 by skyship Found the letter - I see I addressed it to BR rather than CB. It was CB who answered!Mr Bruce Rowan TIGER RESOURCE FINANCE PLC 2. Cromwell Place London SW7 2JE ROYAUME UNI 24th August 2007 Dear Mr Rowan RE: TIGER RESOURCE FINANCE "TIR" Perhaps the only disadvantage of no longer living in the UK, is that I am in practical terms unable now to attend the AGMs of companies in which I invest both my pension & personal investment funds. That said, I was pleased to read that you welcome shareholder comment, so I would now like to pose a few questions and suggestions: 1. TRANSPARENCY Over the past few years, in a time when every listed company has sought to improve shareholder communication and investment companies in particular have provided more regular asset valuations and portfolio declarations, you have moved in the opposite direction with now just Quarterly NAV declarations and Half-yearly portfolio declarations. Over the same period the dealing activity of TIR has been almost moribund, so the previous reason given of "necessary secrecy so as not to hinder stake building or liquidation" clearly has no base in fact. Might I therefore suggest that you immediately, in the interests of good shareholder communication, change your reporting to: # NAV declarations - weekly # Portfolio declarations - monthly 2. MIT VENTURES CORP. Listed in the TIR portfolio is a holding valued at £40k and described merely as MIT Ventures Corp. Loan Note. Could you please provide some information on this investment, in particular whether we earn any interest, whether there is any capital upside and when it is due for repayment? 3. ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES Over the 3 years of 2004/5/6 Administrative Expenses have escalated markedly as a %age of Shareholder Funds: 2004: 3.7% 2005: 4.2% 2006: 5.4% In view of the relative inactivity over this period, could you please advise why such an escalation has occurred, how it can be justified and whether you recognise that a cap on costs should be instigated. 4. CHAIRMAN'S STATEMENT 26th June 2007 A very brief study of the TIGER portfolio shows a bundle of frankly rather poorly performing mining companies, saved wholly by the holding in Franconia. Fortunately the overall performance of the portfolio relies on the two major investments in the junior oil & gas exploration sector together accounting for over two-thirds of the TIR non-cash portfolio as at end May'07. In spite of this fact your Chairman's Statement of 26th June makes absolutely no mention of OIL. Could you tell me something as to your thoughts in that area? 5. INVESTMENT STRATEGY & PERFORMANCE Again over the 3 years of 2004/5/6, a period of massively increasing commodity prices, soaring share prices and almost historically low interest rates you have been keeping an average of 45% of TIR net assets in CASH. This policy has quite naturally severely constrained the investment performance of TIR. To respond that over this period there was a lack of assured good investments in the Natural Resource sector is patently absurd. With hindsight of course, just buying into the leading global miners (BHP Billiton, Anglo-American, Xstrata etc.) would have proved well worthwhile, as would have been a policy of delegating responsibility by buying into any of the leading Natural Resource investment trusts. Sitting on CASH in such boom conditions shows what can only be kindly described as questionable judgement. Of course, we can't wind the clock back, but equally an alternative to the recent relative failure surely needs to be found. The Board's principal responsibility to shareholders is to maximise shareholder value. Other than through investment performance, the Board in my view quite correctly sought and received shareholder approval for a series of Section 163(3) share buybacks with the stated objective of reducing the share price discount to the underlying NAV. However, the Scheme has only partially been successful. By buying-in stock at such a discount to NAV, the underlying NAV per share has been improved; but over the period of the buybacks the NAV discount has simply widened further. A couple of weeks ago, when Ascent Resources was trading above 30p, the NAV discount exceeded 50%! Might I recommend a solution: GENERAL TENDER OFFER Another tactic used by many listed companies has been to return cash to shareholders via a general tender offer. This has the subsidiary benefit of reducing the NAV discount as it confirms the Board's intent to more closely align the share price to underlying value. What can be done once, can be done again should the excess discount continue. In the case of TIR a 1 for 3 buyback @ a price in the region of 4.5p-5.0p / share would seem to be appropriate bearing in mind the current Market price of 3.65p; the current Gross NAV of c.6.3p; and the recent share price intra-day high of 4.85p-5.0p. Allowing for costs of 200k (perhaps too high an estimate), the cost of the tender would be £2.82m-£3.11m; ie an amount easily fundable from existing cash balances. I suggest that the above course of action will: a). Reduce the future NAV discount b). Provide shareholders with a cash bonus more than compensating for past lack of dividends c). Utilise a fair %age of the cash reserves for which TIR has had no apparent use over recent years I assume that you will wish to discuss the contents of this letter with both other Board members and retained professional advisers, so I have forwarded copies to: # Colin Bird # Michael Nolan # Davy Corporate Finance # WH Ireland I look forward to hearing from you regarding the various questions above; and most especially regarding the Tender Offer proposal. Please do feel free to respond by Email. Yours sincerely |
Posted at 08/3/2009 12:38 by skyship WK - I traded letters with TIR back in August 2007. So as to be sure of a response I addressed my initial letter to Bruce Rowan, but mailed copies to all directors & all advisors. The reply when it came was from Colin Bird VIA (and I quote): "....which we received earlier this month via the Company's nominated advisor's Davy Corporate Finance." My outgoing letter: Dear Mr Rowan RE: TIGER RESOURCE FINANCE "TIR" Perhaps the only disadvantage of no longer living in the UK, is that I am in practical terms unable now to attend the AGMs of companies in which I invest both my pension & personal investment funds. That said, I was pleased to read that you welcome shareholder comment, so I would now like to pose a few questions and suggestions: 1. TRANSPARENCY Over the past few years, in a time when every listed company has sought to improve shareholder communication and investment companies in particular have provided more regular asset valuations and portfolio declarations, you have moved in the opposite direction with now just Quarterly NAV declarations and Half-yearly portfolio declarations. Over the same period the dealing activity of TIR has been almost moribund, so the previous reason given of "necessary secrecy so as not to hinder stake building or liquidation" clearly has no base in fact. Might I therefore suggest that you immediately, in the interests of good shareholder communication, change your reporting to: # NAV declarations - weekly # Portfolio declarations - monthly 2. MIT VENTURES CORP. Listed in the TIR portfolio is a holding valued at £40k and described merely as MIT Ventures Corp. Loan Note. Could you please provide some information on this investment, in particular whether we earn any interest, whether there is any capital upside and when it is due for repayment? 3. ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES Over the 3 years of 2004/5/6 Administrative Expenses have escalated markedly as a %age of Shareholder Funds: 2004: 3.7% 2005: 4.2% 2006: 5.4% In view of the relative inactivity over this period, could you please advise why such an escalation has occurred, how it can be justified and whether you recognise that a cap on costs should be instigated. 4. CHAIRMAN'S STATEMENT 26th June 2007 A very brief study of the TIGER portfolio shows a bundle of frankly rather poorly performing mining companies, saved wholly by the holding in Franconia. Fortunately the overall performance of the portfolio relies on the two major investments in the junior oil & gas exploration sector together accounting for over two-thirds of the TIR non-cash portfolio as at end May'07. In spite of this fact your Chairman's Statement of 26th June makes absolutely no mention of OIL. Could you tell me something as to your thoughts in that area? 5. INVESTMENT STRATEGY & PERFORMANCE Again over the 3 years of 2004/5/6, a period of massively increasing commodity prices, soaring share prices and almost historically low interest rates you have been keeping an average of 45% of TIR net assets in CASH. This policy has quite naturally severely constrained the investment performance of TIR. To respond that over this period there was a lack of assured good investments in the Natural Resource sector is patently absurd. With hindsight of course, just buying into the leading global miners (BHP Billiton, Anglo-American, Xstrata etc.) would have proved well worthwhile, as would have been a policy of delegating responsibility by buying into any of the leading Natural Resource investment trusts. Sitting on CASH in such boom conditions shows what can only be kindly described as questionable judgement. Of course, we can't wind the clock back, but equally an alternative to the recent relative failure surely needs to be found. The Board's principal responsibility to shareholders is to maximise shareholder value. Other than through investment performance, the Board in my view quite correctly sought and received shareholder approval for a series of Section 163(3) share buybacks with the stated objective of reducing the share price discount to the underlying NAV. However, the Scheme has only partially been successful. By buying-in stock at such a discount to NAV, the underlying NAV per share has been improved; but over the period of the buybacks the NAV discount has simply widened further. A couple of weeks ago, when Ascent Resources was trading above 30p, the NAV discount exceeded 50%! Might I recommend a solution: GENERAL TENDER OFFER Another tactic used by many listed companies has been to return cash to shareholders via a general tender offer. This has the subsidiary benefit of reducing the NAV discount as it confirms the Board's intent to more closely align the share price to underlying value. What can be done once, can be done again should the excess discount continue. In the case of TIR a 1 for 3 buyback @ a price in the region of 4.5p-5.0p / share would seem to be appropriate bearing in mind the current Market price of 3.65p; the current Gross NAV of c.6.3p; and the recent share price intra-day high of 4.85p-5.0p. Allowing for costs of 200k (perhaps too high an estimate), the cost of the tender would be £2.82m-£3.11m; ie an amount easily fundable from existing cash balances. I suggest that the above course of action will: a). Reduce the future NAV discount b). Provide shareholders with a cash bonus more than compensating for past lack of dividends c). Utilise a fair %age of the cash reserves for which TIR has had no apparent use over recent years I assume that you will wish to discuss the contents of this letter with both other Board members and retained professional advisers, so I have forwarded copies to: # Colin Bird # Michael Nolan # Davy Corporate Finance # WH Ireland I look forward to hearing from you regarding the various questions above; and most especially regarding the Tender Offer proposal. Please do feel free to respond by Email. Yours sincerely ==================== I'll try to grab some time to type out the response, but frankly it was just all rather disingenuous! I became disillusioned as to the likelihood of any change, so sold down 90% of my holding. The only way to have any chance of getting change, is to confront the directors at the AGM. I've done that successfully in the past by creating a stink & being downright rude at the AGM when the directors of Lionheart were deplorably seeking to buy out the company for their own advantage. I started by mailshotting some of the larger shareholders on the share register; and found two shareholders who were useful and active; and were also actively participating by buying a meaningful stake. The outcome was liquidation and a fair distribution. Sorry, I can't help as I now live abroad, but obviously wish you every success. |
It looks like you are not logged in. Click the button below to log in and keep track of your recent history.
Support: +44 (0) 203 8794 460 | support@advfn.com
By accessing the services available at ADVFN you are agreeing to be bound by ADVFN's Terms & Conditions
Hot Features
Premium
