ADVFN Logo ADVFN

We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.

Trending Now

Toplists

It looks like you aren't logged in.
Click the button below to log in and view your recent history.

Hot Features

Registration Strip Icon for monitor Customisable watchlists with full streaming quotes from leading exchanges, such as LSE, NASDAQ, NYSE, AMEX, Bovespa, BIT and more.

SRT Srt Marine Systems Plc

24.00
0.00 (0.00%)
Last Updated: 08:00:11
Delayed by 15 minutes
Share Name Share Symbol Market Type Share ISIN Share Description
Srt Marine Systems Plc LSE:SRT London Ordinary Share GB00B0M8KM36 ORD 0.1P
  Price Change % Change Share Price Bid Price Offer Price High Price Low Price Open Price Shares Traded Last Trade
  0.00 0.00% 24.00 23.00 25.00 24.00 23.50 24.00 343,265 08:00:11
Industry Sector Turnover Profit EPS - Basic PE Ratio Market Cap
Communications Services, Nec 30.51M 69k 0.0004 600.00 46.19M
Srt Marine Systems Plc is listed in the Communications Services sector of the London Stock Exchange with ticker SRT. The last closing price for Srt Marine Systems was 24p. Over the last year, Srt Marine Systems shares have traded in a share price range of 20.50p to 68.00p.

Srt Marine Systems currently has 192,457,939 shares in issue. The market capitalisation of Srt Marine Systems is £46.19 million. Srt Marine Systems has a price to earnings ratio (PE ratio) of 600.00.

Srt Marine Systems Share Discussion Threads

Showing 19926 to 19948 of 30050 messages
Chat Pages: Latest  806  805  804  803  802  801  800  799  798  797  796  795  Older
DateSubjectAuthorDiscuss
02/2/2017
21:16
hey Phil, filter button pal..use it! anyway don't need to get back in as in already.This stock needs NO help from me to lower the price cos it's doing a great job on it's own.At least it's woken some of you up, I thought you had all done a runner along with Tucker..
hjb1
02/2/2017
21:08
Hjb1 - it increasingly sounds as if you'd like to get back into SRT at a lower price. Maybe better to sell up entirely and save us the ear-ache.....
Spirited debate is one thing, but this is getting tedious...
Each to his own though, good luck and DYOR etc

philburt
02/2/2017
20:14
They hit the target last year.
the prophet
02/2/2017
20:03
hey super, I'm not whingeing, whatever makes you think that for goodness sake? I just don't like burying my head in the sand like some do it seems.Anyway I have a soft spot for Mr Tucker and SRT and like to keep a few in here just in case a miracle occurs and he actually hits a target for once.
hjb1
02/2/2017
19:11
I can't for the life of me ever imagine, being invested in a company that I felt so negatively about.
smartmoney100
02/2/2017
19:08
And yet, despite all that, here you still are, whingeing away. They must be doing something right or you'd have long gone ;¬)
supernumerary
02/2/2017
18:04
good for you Country, good for you! "something like BT" yeah right! It's not the risk that's the main problem it's the delivery timescales..always "by the end of the year", ooh look! you just said it yourself....doh!
hjb1
02/2/2017
17:34
SRT is not a share for widows or orphans. If you want low risk buy something like BT or UK banks. I note moaning comments on this site. If shareholders don't like the risk sell up and take a profit. I believe that we shall be at £1 by the end of the year or 130 p if the takeover starts. I believe the story and the management.
countryman5
02/2/2017
17:01
Indeed eE

I have been keeping an eye on both Qnective and Frequentis to see if there is any news flow from them in the AIS/MDM space and no there isn't. The latter, seen by Neil as their main competitor, still regales potential customers with the Oman story, the AIS component of which was provided by SRT. Qnective, the lead on the Indonesia deal and partners with Frequentis in Oman, did not involve them in Indonesia. SRT, quite unexpectedly, received an expanded part of the programme. Is that because the Indonesians decided that Frequentis, who have fingers globally in lots of things, are not as good? Or possibly Qnective, having worked with both in Oman, decided that SRT could do the job as well but cheaper or better at the same price?

[Edit: now corrected, but got the two wrong way round in the last two sentences]

lavalmy
02/2/2017
16:39
hjb1, well that rather depends on whose "facts" and "reality" you're talking about. Most of your posts repeat the same mantra, that SRT are unable to sell their products and that nothing will ever come of any project or "opportunity" Your opinion, presented as hard fact is always right and anyone who disagrees or presents anything that might be seen as positive is rubbished for believing in fairies, or hype or told "it's never going to happen".

The fact is that despite "not being able to sell anything", in the last couple of years SRT have sold equipment to Bahrain, Qatar, Philippines, Trinity House, Panama Canal, West Africa, Saudi and Indonesia. We all agree it could be better but a more balanced view would recognise that SRT are not losing these "project opportunities" to competitors. Lead times are proving longer than expected. Given the well appreciated issue of getting signatures on the contract from governments, I for one have a more understanding attitude than you and don't look to blame anyone.

We are all entitled to our opinion but we've heard yours ad nauseum but that does not make it fact. It would be nice, if like many here you actually posted something we don't know that helps us understand the company we are invested in.

alter ego
02/2/2017
16:31
hey Laval you need to keep up pal, another one with head in the clouds.lol
Just putting a different spin to the oh isn't everything going well on this forum.They havn't got their head in the clouds over there.Anyway shouldn't you be having your afternoon nap, or have you had it and woken up in a bad mood..lmao.

hjb1
02/2/2017
16:14
hey yump, not quite sure what planet you're on pal? come back when you've landed back on this one.
Eagle, facts and reality are usually worse, that's why people prefer to listen to the hype.

hjb1
02/2/2017
15:48
hjb1, Glad to hear that you enjoy generally moaning and that it isn't financial pressure that is impacting your psyche.
eagle eye
02/2/2017
15:46
Where are the posts with people thinking this year's forecast would get smashed ?

Perhaps you had it in your head. I think the rest of us have just been thinking we've waited long enough for a tangible large contract, so a while longer won't seem long to wait.

I seem to recall however, plenty of discussion about the back end loading of the contract and at what point in the next couple of years profits would start to flow properly and also how to place a value on the business, as the first couple of years would be modest, followed by a big jump.

Your approach reminds me of a recent chat in the pub where the idea of nationalising the railways was greeted with a comment about 'look what happened when they were nationalised - look at British Leyland'. Because of course things are exactly the same now as they were in the 70's. Yeah right, so lets not bother.

Its those bees buzzing around in one's bonnet. They drown out anything else.

yump
02/2/2017
13:16
yes but the forecast was supposed to get smashed wasn't it?, supposed to be such an easy soft target wasn't it? piece of cake, wasn't it? No probs we all thought,.. hmmm!
I just can't see £7m+ deliverable coming in for this year end..hope I'm wrong, we will find out soon enough.

hjb1
02/2/2017
12:51
regarding the £12m at end of March, whilst I agree it's open to speculation, I would suggest with an order book of £70m, then a relatively modest deliverable against that order book of £7m or so should secure the forecast.Whether we get it this f/y or next, I don't know, but it is, imo, not unreasonable to suggest the £12m could be made.
the prophet
02/2/2017
12:48
No problems, hjb.
I'm taking the view that we are already doing work for phase2 and that no news will be released regarding phases, only when we have delivered deliverables.
I could be right or wrong on that, but that is my understanding from the feedback I've been getting.

the prophet
02/2/2017
12:45
eagle, you were going well until you said the £12m by end of March.I think I've cracked a rib falling off my chair laughing!And no I have a very modest amount in here now so no probs there, not stressed just fed up that once again at this point we are at the very same position we seem to have been for year after year.
hjb1
02/2/2017
12:39
I certainly expect an RNS stating that first phase has been a success and they are moving into the next phase as it's material imv.As we have not had this news then I take it that we are still in phase one, which is still very much the talking about it part.
Until we get some news that they have moved into phase two then this contract is still risky and could well be cancelled like others have been before.just my opinion of course.

hjb1
02/2/2017
12:30
hjb1,
I'm sure you aren't the only person frustrated by the lack of newsflow, but its worth remembering that SRT has come a long way over the past 2 years.
The big opportunity then was the US mandate (and what happened to that) plus moving AIS boxes through third party distributors.
Fortunately management figured out that national mandates were a big opportunity in their own right. I think the game changer was GeoVS which solved the problem of integration and display, while moving up the value chain.
Bahrain was installed and has been a great showcase for SRT. Read across Panama Canal. Credit where it's due, SRT has appears to have positioned itself well in a fast growing industry.
In hindsight, paying 40p six years ago was a big leap of faith. The opportunity cost over the that time has been very expensive, but the business has evolved and is in far better shape now.
Maybe your portfolio has an overweight position in SRT, which is out of kilter and is causing stress. I'm sure you aren't the only person with this issue.
Hopefully SRT can muster up £12m by end of March and then we can all go back to sleep again LOL.

eagle eye
02/2/2017
12:24
hjb

I think it is wrong to say:

'The Indo deal will ONLY continue if first phase is passed...atm it isn't so deal up in the air,'

Unless you know that the first phase has not been passed?
My understanding is that these contracts just roll on, yes, there are building blocks to be put in before the next bit can be done, the same as in any contract. But I don't expect SRT to give us a running commentary of exactly where they are at.I expect them to release news once a 'deliverable' has been delivered and comment at that point as to how everything is going.

the prophet
02/2/2017
11:46
hey yumpy, suppose you believe in fairies too? you certainly fell for the "conveyor belt" line, amongst all the other stuff..lol.The Indo deal will ONLY continue if first phase is passed...atm it isn't so deal up in the air, might not be a second or third phase for all we know, don't forget all the other govt deals that have been on the cards for how many years now, and many totally cancelled, so chickens, counting and hatch spring to mind.I will believe it when the money is banked and not before.
hjb1
02/2/2017
11:14
Bad education system evidence again this morning, with the guff about 'Reality' from hjb1.

The REALITY is that there WAS lots of promise and no decent contracts and now there has been a very large contract announced.

The reality in someone's head doesn't necessarily match that.

fwiw people were losing faith below 40p in October and again twice in November. There is absolutely no way of knowing whether anyone is losing faith more now than then.

Personally I have a lot more faith now at 40p with a big contract, than at 20p with not much happening.

Then again Aliens might land tommorrow - if they are not already here and issuing executive orders willy-nilly.

yump
Chat Pages: Latest  806  805  804  803  802  801  800  799  798  797  796  795  Older

Your Recent History

Delayed Upgrade Clock