ADVFN Logo ADVFN

We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.

Trending Now

Toplists

It looks like you aren't logged in.
Click the button below to log in and view your recent history.

Hot Features

Registration Strip Icon for alerts Register for real-time alerts, custom portfolio, and market movers

SOU Sound Energy Plc

1.00
0.164 (19.62%)
17 Jun 2024 - Closed
Delayed by 15 minutes
Share Name Share Symbol Market Type Share ISIN Share Description
Sound Energy Plc LSE:SOU London Ordinary Share GB00B90XFF12 ORD 1P
  Price Change % Change Share Price Bid Price Offer Price High Price Low Price Open Price Shares Traded Last Trade
  0.164 19.62% 1.00 0.992 0.996 1.24 0.922 1.18 45,607,899 16:35:13
Industry Sector Turnover Profit EPS - Basic PE Ratio Market Cap
Crude Petroleum & Natural Gs 0 -7.16M -0.0037 -2.70 19.16M
Sound Energy Plc is listed in the Crude Petroleum & Natural Gs sector of the London Stock Exchange with ticker SOU. The last closing price for Sound Energy was 0.84p. Over the last year, Sound Energy shares have traded in a share price range of 0.59p to 1.795p.

Sound Energy currently has 1,915,955,549 shares in issue. The market capitalisation of Sound Energy is £19.16 million. Sound Energy has a price to earnings ratio (PE ratio) of -2.70.

Sound Energy Share Discussion Threads

Showing 36676 to 36694 of 42900 messages
Chat Pages: Latest  1476  1475  1474  1473  1472  1471  1470  1469  1468  1467  1466  1465  Older
DateSubjectAuthorDiscuss
15/6/2017
16:22
Yep.....as pwr previous post, give us a nice big fat flare.........then we know for sure it can flow.
telbap
15/6/2017
15:50
Fair chance we might have an oil strike as opposed to just gas.A bunded flsre pit could be indicative of gas saturated oil.If it does turn out to be oil then we are in for some significant price movement.None of the above obviates the need for caution as expressed by ngms whose posts are always made with feet on the ground.
selber82
15/6/2017
15:31
Hi Chelley

I'll tell you what, you and your mate are out of the same pod, about to take over the world, how could anyone stop you? I am grateful for your contribution to Sound over the years and can't wait for your next prediction. How about the end of the world? That could tax you two ultra intelligent super humans. One question bothers me though, who out of the two of you is going to be God? I await your answer with mesmerising interest.

hal5
15/6/2017
13:29
Being very busy jet setting round the world but I put two mins aside to let you know my opinion which I know many of you are waiting for .This has all the classic signs of hope bust all jam tomorrow and very very little substance mainly to keep the less unfortunate of you all interested and let's be honest put the average of ten of you and add your iqs and it still wouldn't match mine .Myself and ngms27 should charge you for our knowledge but we like to help those who sadly are basically thick , so in my opinion the big drop is just around the corner unless you prefer the wisdom of the site clown west ham another unfortunate soul .C01
chelwood01
15/6/2017
13:19
It's clear to me as well that someone was in the know. The signs are promising but at the moment it's not a slam dunk. I've seen two well known companies issue discovery RNS's in the past AFTER logging then flow tests failed and they reported residual hydrocarbons from breached traps. SOU haven't got as far as announcing a discovery yet just gas shows albeit in JPs words significant.I maintain my view that the backend of next week is likely to be the earliest we will find out whether they are going to flow test.
ngms27
15/6/2017
13:02
Remarkably low volume today considering the likely news flow. However, still much to do at Badile to prove it is a commercial gas find, but the initial signs are good. The rather large volume on Tuesday (and subsequent hike in share price) on no news does suggest that there is some "insider" stuff going on, which I find unsavoury - but this is the AIM market. Still heavily invested and watching with great interest.
kevjames
15/6/2017
12:58
Ngms.......afyer the te8 debacle....i would not put the flags out until i see the nice big flare burning.
telbap
15/6/2017
12:53
Me too ngms.
apad

apad
15/6/2017
12:46
ngms27: very much appreciate your knowledge and posts - maybe a little more negative than my own view usually but all the more valuable for that.
p_j_s1
15/6/2017
09:56
Ram6ler you couldn't see through the looking glass. Are you in wonderland?
ngms27
15/6/2017
09:36
ngms,
ive always seen thru you, but you employers must be getting a little disillusioned with you now as the tactics are obviously not working, i suggest you jump before you are pushed.

ram6ler
15/6/2017
09:32
I didn't say it was 50% now, notice the greater than sign...
ngms27
15/6/2017
09:15
rambler . Very funny
rutter
15/6/2017
09:08
Nope, 50% plus of a commercial discovery NOT JUST discovering gas like the TE-8 Tagi.There is a vast difference.
ngms27
15/6/2017
09:00
ngms,
you said 30% chance of success, then you changed it to 50% of finding gas..they have found it you moron, so that in my book makes it 100% chance of finding gas. do the maths.

ram6ler
15/6/2017
08:57
ngms,

i resemble that remark

ram6ler
15/6/2017
08:49
ngms,

50% ?, are you a complete idiot or still attending the idiot-to-be classes. ?

its a 100% certainty, and soon we will see the back of you just as weve seen the back of ol shelly and the matching band.

ram6ler
15/6/2017
07:37
The original start of drilling RNS stated the following:


The well is planned to be drilled and logged to a total depth of 4,445m (4,378m total vertical depth) with drilling and logging expected to take approximately 100 days. Assuming gas is encountered, a further 25 days will be required for the completion and testing phase.

Yesterday the RNS stated the depth was at 4375m MD ( measured depth) so I think we still need to drill around 65 m to get to the total vertical depth - however once in the reservoir they may "steer" the drill bit. I can't see any information on what the resevoir thickness was suppose to be - anyone know? Getting interesting now - GLA.

kevjames
15/6/2017
07:24
ngms27: telling it like it is, as usual. GL.
manics
Chat Pages: Latest  1476  1475  1474  1473  1472  1471  1470  1469  1468  1467  1466  1465  Older

Your Recent History

Delayed Upgrade Clock