Shanta Gold Share Discussion Threads

[jc2706] 19/3/2019 08:48

Agree with all of that Redtrend. I would extend your 'poo list' and suggest that nobody associated with this process, Government, Parliament, EU or the public, have come out with much credit.

[hazl] 19/3/2019 08:21

Apart from the redtrend bit of course.

[hazl] 19/3/2019 08:20

At last a sensible post from AG.

[hazl] 19/3/2019 08:18

If there is anything of substantial news,either way,he won't make any difference.
338
imo

[johnrxx99] 19/3/2019 08:10

Order! Order!

Please continue Sir AG

[338] 19/3/2019 07:53

"stop AG" campaign makes more sense... :)

[juju44] 19/3/2019 07:37

Bercows ludicrous decision is just part of the "Stop Brexit " campaign . Its not going to happen

[jc2706] 19/3/2019 07:35

Bringing = bribing.

[jc2706] 19/3/2019 07:33

I fully support Bercow's decision. The deal has been destroyed in Parliament twice so to submit it again and play on panic supported by bringing the DUP to get it through is unpalatable to say the least. I also find it interesting that a second public vote is undemocratic whereas you can browbeat a vote through parliament as many times as it takes to get it through.

[redhill] 19/3/2019 07:26

No he just followed house precedents.
Can't keep voting on the same motion whether you like it or not.

[338] 19/3/2019 00:31

Watch out PoG tomorrow... John Bercow has just done a surprisingly shocking decision in the house of parliament

[jasper2712] 18/3/2019 19:53

Why not bring this up at the AGM?

[redhill] 18/3/2019 19:26

tomrob

That is very unfortunate from your perspective.

Could i ask what was actually supplied as i find it strange the intermediary company were relying on a gentlemen's agreement for payment ?

[hazl] 18/3/2019 18:29

This is like many miners....except that we seem to have a troll.

[tomrob] 18/3/2019 18:25

No, the intermediary company folded having been unable to pesuade EZ to honour the verbal deal that they had with EZ's predecessor as CFO. We incurred considerable costs on the back of our contract with them but it turned out they were relying on some kind of gentleman's agreement with Shanta.
Lesson learned from our perspective but it cost us £34k to learn it.

[redhill] 18/3/2019 18:10

tomrob.

Have you still not had your monies that were owed?

[redhill] 18/3/2019 18:09

tomrob .

Yes they do just pay TZ. I believe if they were based in London there could be double taxation as there isn't an agreement in force, so i understand.

[tomrob] 18/3/2019 18:01

And the company will, I'm sure, pay their taxes according to the rates applicable where they do business ("Tanzanian Corporation tax at 30% 3,942,000") rather than where they're registered ("standard rate of income tax for Guernsey companies which is 0%").

[tomrob] 18/3/2019 18:00

My business is registered 2 minutes walk away from the location of the SHG AGM.

In 16 years no-one has ever told us that we need to have an AGM in Guernsey. Maybe I should look into it.

[redhill] 18/3/2019 17:56

Not sure if there are restrictions where they hold the Agm but i'm betting there are various tax advantages by being based in the Channel Islands.

[redtrend] 18/3/2019 17:29

Redhill they are indeed and I wasn't sure how stringent the rather archaic rule is that an AGM if not held in registered office, has to be held "at some other place within the city, town or village in which the registered office of the company is situated".